scholarly journals Point‐of‐care gastrointestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease: An accurate alternative for disease monitoring

JGH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dharshan Sathananthan ◽  
Arvind Rajagopalan ◽  
Lucinda Van De Ven ◽  
Serena Martin ◽  
James Fon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Disease Monitoring ◽  
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals Predicting disease course in ulcerative colitis using stool proteins identified through an aptamer-based screen

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanam Soomro ◽  
Suresh Venkateswaran ◽  
Kamala Vanarsa ◽  
Marwa Kharboutli ◽  
Malavika Nidhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Disease Monitoring ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Lipocalin 2 ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Stool Samples

AbstractIn the search for improved stool biomarkers for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), an aptamer-based screen of 1129 stool proteins was conducted using stool samples from an IBD cohort. Here we report that of the 20 proteins subsequently validated by ELISA, stool Ferritin, Fibrinogen, Haptoglobin, Hemoglobin, Lipocalin-2, MMP-12, MMP-9, Myeloperoxidase, PGRP-S, Properdin, Resistin, Serpin A4, and TIMP-1 are significantly elevated in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) compared to controls. When tested in a longitudinal cohort of 50 UC patients at 4 time-points, fecal Fibrinogen, MMP-8, PGRP-S, and TIMP-2 show the strongest positive correlation with concurrent PUCAI and PGA scores and are superior to fecal calprotectin. Unlike fecal calprotectin, baseline stool Fibrinogen, MMP-12, PGRP-S, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 can predict clinical remission at Week-4. Here we show that stool proteins identified using the comprehensive aptamer-based screen are superior to fecal calprotectin alone in disease monitoring and prediction in IBD.

scholarly journals P430 Feasibility and reliability of gastrointestinal ultrasound in pregnant inflammatory bowel disease patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S391-S393
Author(s):  
F de Voogd ◽  
H Joshi ◽  
E Van Wassenaer ◽  
G D’Haens ◽  
K Gecse
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Terminal Ileum ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Active Disease

Abstract Background Disease activity during pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with miscarriage, preterm delivery and low birth weight. Monitoring disease activity throughout the pregnancy is therefore important. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) has a high potential as a point-of-care tool for monitoring disease activity in IBD as it has been shown to correlate well with endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. However, data are scarce on the use of GIUS in IBD throughout pregnancy. The aim of this prospective study is to determine the feasibility and reliability of GIUS in pregnant IBD patients. Methods Patients were included when visiting the outpatient IBD pregnancy clinic. At each trimester, clinical and biochemical disease activity was evaluated and GIUS was performed. Feasibility was assessed by the ability to visualise each bowel segment (terminal ileum (TI), ascending (AC), transverse (TC), descending (DC) and sigmoid colon (SC)). Reliability was evaluated by using clinical and biochemical disease activity as a gold standard. This was defined as a Harvey–Bradshaw Index ≥4 in Crohn’s disease (CD) or a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index ≥5 in ulcerative colitis and a faecal calprotectin (FCP)³ 250 mg/g. Bowel wall thickness (BWT) of > 3 mm in the colon and > 2mm in the terminal ileum was considered as signs of active inflammation on ultrasound. A Mann–Whitney U-test and chi-square were used for statistical analysis. Results Thirty-two IBD patients (54% CD) were studied. Both a GIUS and FCP was available in 18, 11 and 6 patients for the first, second and third trimester, respectively. Eleven of 32 (34%) patients had clinically active disease at least at one time point during the pregnancy. Table 1 shows the visibility per segment. When the active disease was defined as an FCP ≥ 250 mg/g, GIUS could distinguish active from the non-active disease in the first, second and third trimester with a sensitivity of 80%, 75% and 75% and specificity of 85%, 86% and 100%, respectively. FCP levels were significantly higher in patients with an active disease on GIUS regardless of the trimester (mean 1095.5 ± 1453.8 mg/g vs. 265.25 ± 649.8 mg/g, p < 0.0001). Conclusion GIUS is accurate to distinguish active from the quiescent disease in pregnancy. Feasibility to visualise the TI and the SC decreased during the second and third trimester, although active disease could still be detected. Consequently, GIUS is feasible and reliable to assess disease activity throughout pregnancy in IBD.

scholarly journals Factors affecting clinical decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease and the role of point-of-care calprotectin

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1756283X1774473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Derwa ◽  
Christopher J.M. Williams ◽  
Ruchit Sood ◽  
Saqib Mumtaz ◽  
M. Hassan Bholah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Objectives: Patient-reported symptoms correlate poorly with mucosal inflammation. Clinical decision-making may, therefore, not be based on objective evidence of disease activity. We conducted a study to determine factors associated with clinical decision-making in a secondary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, using a cross-sectional design. Methods: Decisions to request investigations or escalate medical therapy were recorded from outpatient clinic encounters in a cohort of 276 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). Disease activity was assessed using clinical indices, self-reported flare and faecal calprotectin ≥ 250 µg/g. Demographic, disease-related and psychological factors were assessed using validated questionnaires. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between clinical decision-making and symptoms, mucosal inflammation and psychological comorbidity. Results: Self-reported flare was associated with requesting investigations in CD [odds ratio (OR) 5.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84–17.0] and UC (OR 10.8; 95% CI 1.8–64.3), but mucosal inflammation was not (OR 1.62; 95% CI 0.49–5.39; and OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.21–1.05, respectively). Self-reported flare (OR 7.96; 95% CI 1.84–34.4), but not mucosal inflammation (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.46–6.13) in CD, and clinical disease activity (OR 10.36; 95% CI 2.47–43.5) and mucosal inflammation (OR 4.26; 95% CI 1.28–14.2) in UC were associated with escalation of medical therapy. Almost 60% of patients referred for investigation had no evidence of mucosal inflammation. Conclusions: Apart from escalation of medical therapy in UC, clinical decision-making was not associated with mucosal inflammation in IBD. The use of point-of-care calprotectin testing may aid clinical decision-making, improve resource allocation and reduce costs in IBD.

scholarly journals P736 Point-of-care infliximab quantification in inflammatory bowel disease in daily practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S484-S484
Author(s):  
M P Costa Santos ◽  
C Palmela ◽  
C Gouveia ◽  
C Fidalgo ◽  
L Glória ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals P295 Comparative Assessment of Infliximab Trough Levels between Point-of-Care Testing and current Standard of Care (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S325-S325
Author(s):  
D Maniero ◽  
G Lorenzon ◽  
I Marsilio ◽  
A Rigo ◽  
R Cardin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Deming Regression ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Trough Levels

Abstract Background Infliximab (IFX) is a monoclonal antibody that targets cytokine tumor necrosis factor; it is used for the treatment of patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). IFX induces and maintains remission and mucosal healing in patients with IBD. Measurement of trough levels (TL) of IFX is important to assess if the drug is within its therapeutic concentrationand to explain lack/loss of response. Standard laboratory tests to assess IFX trough levels (enzyme linked immunosorbent assays, ELISA) present some downsides, related to the long turnaround (about 3 hours), and the need of specialized equipment and laboratory personnel. For this reason, point-of care testing (POCT) was developed to provide results within a few minutes from blood collection, leading to a decision-making approach. Aim To determine the degree of analytical correlation between a recently developed POCT (ProciseDx) IFX assay which analyze capillary whole blood and the comparative ELISA from serum. Methods From October 2020 to January 2021, patients (aged≥18 years) taking IFX were recruited at Gastroenterology Unit, Padua University Hospital. In each patient, IFX levels from capillary whole blood collected by finger stick were performed using the ProciseDx IFX assay with reportable range between 1.7-77.2 µg/mL; at the same time, a serum sample from venous blood was collected to carry out Grifols’ Promonitor ELISA test (range 0.035–14.4 µg/mL). A Deming regression test was used to identify the correlation between the two methods. Results Eighty-seven patients were enrolled (63% males; mean age of 44±16), with 52% of them having CD, 45% UC and 3% an undetermined-Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The assessment with ProciseDx POCT was feasible in each patient and only in three cases blood collection from finger prick was repeated. Moreover, from blood collection to results we needed about 3±0.5 minutes, while serum ELISA analysis required the collection of at least 40 samples (around three weeks at our centre) and 3 hours to be performed. 39 patients (59% males; mean age of 44±16) had TL as assessed by ProciseDx IFX assay lower than 1.7 or greater than 14.4 µg/mL, in accordance with ELISA assessment. Among the remaining 48 patients (67% males with mean age of 45±17), The correlation between the two tests was high (the total results showed an R squared of 0.691 (95% CI 0.717-0.902). Conclusion The ProciseDx POCT has good accuracy but was more rapid and easy to be performed in providing the results of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in outpatients taking IFX. This could lead to a more effective optimization of the biological drug, thus avoiding treatment failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document