Efficacy and retrievability of root canal filling using calcium silicate‐based and epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers with matched obturation techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seo Ryeong Kim ◽  
Sang Won Kwak ◽  
Ju‐Kyung Lee ◽  
Hye‐Jin Goo ◽  
Jung‐Hong Ha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

Evaluation of the biological and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate‐based and epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Cardoso Ferreira ◽  
Lucas Siqueira Pinheiro ◽  
Júlia Silveira Nunes ◽  
Roberta Almeida Mendes ◽  
Cláudia Daniela Schuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physicochemical Properties ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

scholarly journals Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of a new system for root canal filling using calcium silicate-based root canal sealers

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Tanomaru-Filho ◽  
Fernanda Ferrari Esteves Torres ◽  
Jader Camilo Pinto ◽  
Airton Oliveira Santos-Junior ◽  
Karina Ines Medina Carita Tavares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
New System

scholarly journals A Comparative Chemical Study of Calcium Silicate-Containing and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław Reszka ◽  
Alicja Nowicka ◽  
Mariusz Lipski ◽  
Włodzimierz Dura ◽  
Agnieszka Droździk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Chemical Elements ◽  
Petri Dish ◽  
Chemical Study ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Sodium Magnesium ◽  
Inner Diameter ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

Objective.The present study assessed the chemical elements in two novel calcium silicate-containing root canal sealers, BioRoot RCS and Well-Root ST, compared to a calcium silicate-containing root canal sealer that has been on the market for several years, MTA Fillapex, and epoxy resin-based sealer AHPlus.Material and Methods.The sealers were mixed and manipulated according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Twelve cylindrical molds (inner diameter 4 mm; height 3 mm) were placed on a glass petri dish and packed with the materials. The dish was transferred to an incubator. After 72 h the molds were examined by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis.Results.BioRoot RCS and Well-Root ST had high peaks of calcium, zirconium, oxygen, carbon, silicon, and chlorine. Well-Root ST also had sodium, magnesium, aluminum, and titanium peaks. MTA Fillapex and AHPlus had carbon, oxygen, calcium, titanium, and bismuth peaks. A silicon peak was also observed for MTA Fillapex, and zirconium and tungsten peaks for AHPlus.Conclusion.BioRoot RSC had the highest degree of purity. The clinical implication of metals contained in the other sealers needs to be investigated.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the radiopacity of selected calcium-silicate root canal sealers

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław Reszka ◽  
Katarzyna Grocholewicz ◽  
Agnieszka Droździk ◽  
Mariusz Lipski
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

Introduction: International standards require adequate radiopacity of root canal filling materials to distinguish them from natural structures, such as tooth tissues, and to allow evaluation of the quality of the root canal filling.The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the radiopacity of selected calcium-silicate root canal sealers compared with the resin-based AH Plus root canal sealer.Materials and methods: The study included 6 root canal sealers: BioRoot RCS, GuttaFlow bioseal, MTA Fillapex, Total Fill BC Sealer, Well-Root ST and AH Plus. Six disc-shaped samples were prepared from all analysed materials (4 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick) and analysed using a digital radiography technique and aluminium step wedges (1.5–15 mm thick) as a standard reference. The radiopacity was determined using computer image analysis. The data was statistically analysed using a Tukey’s range test.Results: All root canal sealers showed radiopacity at least corresponding to the 3 mm aluminium step wedge. AH Plus (13.23 mm Al) showed the highest radiopacity, followed by Total Fill BC Sealer (7.93 mm Al), Well-Root ST (7.12 mm Al), BioRoot RCS (5.93 mm Al) and GuttaFlow bioseal (5.08 mm Al ). MTA Fillapex (3.02 mm Al) showed the lowest radiopacity.Conclusions: Although the evaluated root canal sealers show different radiopacities, all the materials met the criteria laid down by the International Organization of Standardization.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the physicochemical properties of silicone- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Verardino de CAMARGO ◽  
Yara Terezinha Corrêa SILVA-SOUSA ◽  
Rodrigo Presotto Ferreira da ROSA ◽  
Jardel Francisco MAZZI-CHAVES ◽  
Fabiane Carneiro LOPES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physicochemical Properties ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

Anti-inflammatory and Osteogenic Effects of Calcium Silicate–based Root Canal Sealers

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin-Na Lee ◽  
Ji-Uk Hong ◽  
Se-Min Kim ◽  
Ji-Hyun Jang ◽  
Hoon-Sang Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Root Canal Sealers
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document