Donald A. Walker, ed.. Perspectives on the history of economic thought, Volume I: Classical and neoclassical economic thought. Volume 2: Twentieth century economic thought. (Published for the History of Economics Society by Edgar Gower, Aldershott, 1989.

1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-126
Author(s):  
Peter Groenewegen
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Neoclassical Economic ◽  
History Of Economics ◽  
History Of

Tony Lawson and the history of economic thought

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-1011
Author(s):  
Diogo Lourenço ◽  
Mário Graça Moura
Keyword(s):  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Heterodox Economics ◽  
History Of Economics ◽  
History Of ◽  
Social Scientific ◽  
Scientific Ontology

Abstract Tony Lawson’s writings, including those in the history of economics, have an ontological orientation. Several scholars influenced by him likewise practice an ontologically oriented history of economic thought. However, the programme for this sort of history has not been explicitly articulated. In the present paper, we argue that Lawson’s The nature of heterodox economics contains implicitly an ontologically oriented programme in the history of economic thought. We also illustrate the achievements of this programme by reviewing the writings on the later Austrians by Lawson and his associates. Finally, we assess the programme and its achievements in the light of Lawson’s comments on the importance of doing social-scientific ontology and doing history of economic thought.

scholarly journals Journal of the History of Economic Thought Preprints – A Win-Win Model of Development: How Indian Economics Redefined Universal Development from and at the Margins

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bach
Keyword(s):  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Economic Knowledge ◽  
Development Discourse ◽  
Discursive Space ◽  
History Of Economics ◽  
The World ◽  
Elite Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
Century Idea

In this article, I argue that looking at lesser known intellectuals can help history of economics uncover news ways of seeing the world. My focus is the beginnings of “Indian Economics” and its conceptualization of development. The Indian economists, despite their elite status in India, were from an imperial context where they were never considered economists. Studies throughout the 20th century continued to treat them only as nationalists, rarely as contributors to economic knowledge. My research gives agency to these economists. I show how the position of Indian Economics from the margins of discursive space offered a unique perspective that enabled it to discursively innovate at the margins of development discourse. Indian Economics redefined the concept of universality in the existing 19th century idea of development by rejecting the widely accepted comparative advantage model and assertion that progress originated in Europe. Moreover, the economists pushed for universal industrialization, even for imperial territories, arguing that universal progress was beneficial to all.

scholarly journals “Journal of the History of Economic Thought Preprints - Economists and Their Travels, or the Time When JFK Sent Douglass North on a Mission to Brazil”

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Boianovsky
Keyword(s):  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
History Of Economics ◽  
Potential Source ◽  
History Of ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
Douglass North

The role of traveling as a source of discovery and development of new ideas has been controversial in the history of economics. Despite their protective attitude toward established theory, economists have traveled widely and gained new insights or asked new questions as a result of their exposition to “other” economic systems, ideas and forms of behavior. That is particularly the case when they travel to new places while their frameworks are in their initial stages or undergoing changes. This essay examines economists’ traveling as a potential source of new hypotheses, from the 18th to the 20th centuries, with a detailed case study of Douglass North’s 1961 travel to Brazil.

scholarly journals Improving students’ knowledge and skills using an innovative Pecha Kucha presentation assignment in a History of Economic Thought class

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heba Ezzeldin Helmy
Keyword(s):  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
History Of Economics ◽  
History Of ◽  
Technology In Learning

In this article, the author provides motivation in allocating a new formative Pecha Kucha (PK) presentation assignment on one economic school of thought to groups of students in a History of Economic Thought (HET) course. Each group would then post its PK on the Moodle course forum and comment on other PK presentations. The assignment was aimed at engaging students more with technology; in learning on their own, with each other and from each other; in acquiring abstracting skills; in addressing the breadth rather than only the depth of learning; and in making use of the brevity of PK in shortening the long history of economics. The author expounds the advantages and limitations of this assignment in addition to its applicability in other courses.

scholarly journals Non-Proletarianization Theories of the Jewish Worker (1902-1939).

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Vallois
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Progressive Era ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Left Wing ◽  
Intellectual Tradition ◽  
History Of ◽  
Jewish Immigrants

In the early twentieth century, an economic doctrine known as “non-proletarianization theory” became influential among left-wing Zionists in Russia. According to this theory, Jewish workers were unable to “proletarianize”—that is, to integrate large-scale industry; hence, Jewish territorial autonomy was required, whether in Palestine or elsewhere. This article analyzes this theory’s historical development, focusing on the works of three authors: Khaim Dov Horovitz, Yakov Leshchinsky, and Ber Borochov. I claim that discussions of Jewish non-proletarianization can be considered a specific and coherent intellectual tradition in the history of economic thought. I also discuss these theories’ relation to the anti-sweatshop campaign of the Progressive Era, particularly John R. Commons’s writings on Jewish immigrants that were recently debated in this journal.

Emerging Learned Societies: Economic Ideas in Context

1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Presidential Address ◽  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Annual Conference ◽  
Ian Hacking ◽  
History Of Economics ◽  
Learned Societies ◽  
History Of

I found preparing this presidential address a much greater challenge than I had anticipated. After much deliberation, I decided to explore the historical roots of what we are doing now. The History of Economics Society, like other learned societies, holds an annual conference in different cities; members present papers which are discussed; and the Society sponsors a specialist journal—The Journal of the History of Economic Thought. Why? Where did this tradition begin? I turned to several historians of science—I. Bernard Cohen, Thomas S. Kuhn, Richard Yeo, and Ian Hacking—for some background.

scholarly journals Recent developments in the history of economics

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 915-922
Author(s):  
By Roger E Backhouse ◽  
James Forder
Keyword(s):  
Small Sample ◽  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
History Of Economics ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
History Of

Abstract This volume contains a small sample of papers presented to the fiftieth UK History of Economic Thought Conference, held at Balliol College, Oxford, on 29–31 August 2018. Over forty papers were presented, and this special issue contains nine of the thirty-one submitted for possible publication.

H. J. Davenport's Loan Fund Theory of Capital

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Patrick Gunning
Keyword(s):  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Marginal Utility ◽  
Economic Thought ◽  
History Of Economic Thought ◽  
Neoclassical Economic ◽  
Book Value ◽  
Loan Fund ◽  
History Of

The loan fund theory of capital was developed by the unheralded American economist, Herbert J. Davenport (1861-1931). Davenport's name has virtually disappeared from writings on the history of economic thought. Today, he seems best known as a teacher of Frank Knight at Cornell around 1915. Davenport wrote three major books during an 18-year period between 1896 and 1914. The first (1896) was a treatise based on what he called the “principle of sacrifice,” or subjective opportunity cost. His second book, Value and Distribution (1908), covered much of the same ground but also presented some original contributions. It marked his emergence as a professional economist, since he presented his ideas within the context of an appraisal of classical and neoclassical economic doctrine. Among other things, the book contained a penetrating, subjectivist critique of four ideas in the history of subjectivist economics: marginal utility, Eugen von Bohm-Bawerk's theory of capital, Friedrich Wieser's theory of cost, and Frank Fetter's theory of market interest. It also introduced the loan fund theory of capital, which is the topic of this paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document