Conflict resolution using logic programming

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Chomicki ◽  
J. Lobo ◽  
S. Naqvi
10.29007/brgz ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Baláž ◽  
Jozef Frtús ◽  
Martin Homola

While several interesting argumentation-based semantics fordefeasible logic programs have been proposed, to our bestknowledge, none of these approaches is able to fully handle theclosure under strict rules in a sufficient manner: they are eithernot closed, or they use workarounds such as transposition of ruleswhich violates the desired directionality of logic programmingrules.We propose a novel argumentation-based semantics, in which thestatus of arguments is determined by attacks between newlyintroduced conflict resolutions instead of attacks betweenarguments. We show that the semantics is closed w.r.t. strictrules and respects the directionality of inference rules, as wellas other desired properties previously published in theliterature.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Gadke ◽  
Renée M. Tobin ◽  
W. Joel Schneider

Abstract. This study examined the association between Agreeableness and children’s selection of conflict resolution tactics and their overt behaviors at school. A total of 157 second graders responded to a series of conflict resolution vignettes and were observed three times during physical education classes at school. We hypothesized that Agreeableness would be inversely related to the endorsement of power assertion tactics and to displays of problem behaviors, and positively related to the endorsement of negotiation tactics and to displays of adaptive behaviors. Consistent with hypotheses, Agreeableness was inversely related to power assertion tactics and to displays of off-task, disruptive, and verbally aggressive behaviors. There was no evidence that Agreeableness was related to more socially sophisticated responses to conflict, such as negotiation, with our sample of second grade students; however, it was related to displays of adaptive behaviors, specifically on-task behaviors. Limitations, including potential reactivity effects and the restriction of observational data collection to one school-based setting, are discussed. Future researchers are encouraged to collect data from multiple sources in more than one setting over time.


1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 602-603
Author(s):  
Sheldon Stryker
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Fabick ◽  
◽  
Barbara Tint

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document