scholarly journals Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Motorized Needle Guide Template for MRI-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 3019-3027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Eun Song ◽  
Junichi Tokuda ◽  
Kemal Tuncali ◽  
Clare M. Tempany ◽  
Elizabeth Zhang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davut Ibrahim Mahcicek ◽  
Dursun Korel Yildirim ◽  
Gokce Kasaci ◽  
Ozgur Kocaturk

Abstract In clinical routine, the prostate biopsy procedure is performed with the guidance of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging to diagnose prostate cancer. However, the TRUS-guided prostate biopsy brings reliability concerns due to the lack of contrast difference between prostate tissue and lesions. In this study, a novel hydraulic needle delivery system that is designed for performing MRI-guided prostate biopsy procedure with transperineal approach is introduced. The feasibility of the overall system was evaluated through in-vitro phantom experiments under an MRI guidance. The in vitro experiments performed using a certified prostate phantom (incorporating MRI visible lesions). MRI experiments showed that overall hydraulic biopsy needle delivery system has excellent MRI compatibility (SNR Loss < 3%), provides acceptable targeting accuracy (average 2.05±0.46 mm) and procedure time (average 40 minutes).


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 223-223
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Coleman ◽  
Robert C. Susil ◽  
Axel Krieger ◽  
Peter L. Choyke ◽  
Betty Wise ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 3858-3864 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Schimmöller ◽  
M. Quentin ◽  
D. Blondin ◽  
F. Dietzel ◽  
A. Hiester ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e2284
Author(s):  
O.B. Argun ◽  
C. Obek ◽  
M.B. Tuna ◽  
T. Doganca ◽  
I. Tufek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Brachytherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S67
Author(s):  
R. Alex Hsi ◽  
Keith Schulze ◽  
Scott Bildsten ◽  
Carleen T. Bensen ◽  
Aaron Sabolch ◽  
...  

Cureus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Türev Demirtaş ◽  
Gökhan Sönmez ◽  
Şevket Tombul ◽  
Abdullah Demirtaş

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Thomas Austin ◽  
◽  
Paul Kang ◽  
Chinedu Mmeje ◽  
Joseph Mashni ◽  
...  

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the second version of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2) scores in predicting positive in-bore MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsy results across different non-university related institutions. The study focuses on PI-RADS v2 scoring because during the study period, PI-RADS v2.1 had not been released. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review of 147 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the pelvis followed by in-bore MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsy from December 2014 to May 2018. All lesions on mpMRI were rated according to PI-RADS v2 criteria. PI-RADS v2 scores were then compared to MR-guided biopsy results and pre-biopsy PSA values. Results: Prostate Cancer (PCa) was detected in 54% (80/147) of patients, with more prostate cancer being detected with each subsequent increase in PI-RADS scores. Specifically, biopsy results in patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions resulted in PCa in 25.6% (10/39), 58.1% (33/55), and 86.0% (37/43) respectively. Clinically significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 17.9% (7/39), 52.7% (29/55), and 72% (31/43) of cases for PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions respectively. When the PI-RADS scoring and biopsy results were compared across different institutions, there was no difference in the PI-RADS scoring of lesions or in the positive biopsy rates of the lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for PI-RADS 3-4 lesions were also not statistically different across the institutions for detecting Gleason 7 or greater lesions. Conclusion: Our results agree with prior studies that higher PI-RADS scores are associated with the presence of clinically significant PCa and suggest prostate lesions with PI-RADS scores 3-5 have sufficient evidence to warrant targeted biopsy. The comparison of PI-RADS score across different types of non-university practices revealed no difference in scoring and biopsy outcome, suggesting that PI-RADS v2 can be easily applied outside of the university medical center setting. Clinical Relevance: PI-RADS v2 can be applied homogeneously in the non-university setting without significant difference in outcome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S60
Author(s):  
M. Ferriero ◽  
C. Fiori ◽  
A.M. Bove ◽  
R. Mastroianni ◽  
G. Tuderti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document