A temporal logic to deal with fairness in transition systems

Author(s):  
J. P. Queille ◽  
J. Sifakis

Temporal logic model checking is a method for automatically deciding if a sequential circuit satisfies its specifications. In this approach, the circuit is modelled as a state transition system, and specifications are given by temporal logic formulas. Efficient search algorithms are used to determine if the specifications are satisfied or not. The procedure has been used successfully in the past to find subtle errors in a number of non trivial circuit designs. Recently, the size of the circuits that can be handled by this technique has increased dramatically. It is now possible to verify transition systems that are many orders of magnitude larger than was previously the case. In this paper, we describe some of the techniques that have made this increase possible. These techniques are based on the use of binary decision diagrams to represent transition systems and sets of states.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Ignacio Requeno ◽  
José Manuel Colom

Summary Model checking is a generic verification technique that allows the phylogeneticist to focus on models and specifications instead of on implementation issues. Phylogenetic trees are considered as transition systems over which we interrogate phylogenetic questions written as formulas of temporal logic. Nonetheless, standard logics become insufficient for certain practices of phylogenetic analysis since they do not allow the inclusion of explicit time and probabilities. The aim of this paper is to extend the application of model checking techniques beyond qualitative phylogenetic properties and adapt the existing logical extensions and tools to the field of phylogeny. The introduction of time and probabilities in phylogenetic specifications is motivated by the study of a real example: the analysis of the ratio of lactose intolerance in some populations and the date of appearance of this phenotype.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 2874-2876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-wei LAI ◽  
Shan-li HU ◽  
Zheng-yuan NING ◽  
Xiu-li WANG
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riyaz Bhat ◽  
John Chen ◽  
Rashmi Prasad ◽  
Srinivas Bangalore

Author(s):  
Michael Germana

Chapter 2 examines Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man as a text that ekphrastically simulates a moving or “peristrephic” panorama in general, and an antebellum antislavery panorama in particular. In the process, this chapter reads Ellison’s debut novel as a text indebted to and allusive of, while ironically commenting on, the life and career of celebrated fugitive and peristrephic panoramist Henry Box Brown, who shipped himself in a sealed wooden crate from Richmond to Philadelphia and thus from slavery to freedom in 1849. Brown’s subsequent efforts to navigate the terrain of abolitionist discourse within a white supremacist culture led him to create a moving panorama called the Mirror of Slavery, which chronicled the cruelties of slavery, yet ended with the promise of universal emancipation. In appropriating the visual grammar of the antislavery panorama, Ellison also extends its ambivalent temporal logic to create his own alternative history in service of the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document