Systematic Approach Based on Best Practices to Develop Requirements Engineering (RE) Guideline in an Organization

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azlena Haron ◽  
Shamsul Sahibuddin ◽  
Haizan Yusoff ◽  
Mohd Haffez Osman
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Systematic Approach

scholarly journals CONCEPT AND ELEMENTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE ACTIVITIES OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Oleh Melnik ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Organizational Support ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Scientific Study ◽  
Information Support ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Theoretical Studies ◽  
Narrow Sense ◽  
Technological Support ◽  
Office System

The relevance of the scientific article is due to the reform of the prosecutor's office. In the process of transforming the prosecutor's office system, it is necessary to introduce in its activity modern practices aimed at improving the effectiveness of the prosecutor's office. In this regard, there is a need for scientific study of the organizational support of the prosecutor's office. The purpose of the scientific article is to define the concept and elements of organizational support for the activities of the prosecutor's office. The basis for studying the organizational support of the prosecutor's office is theoretical studies of the organization of work and management in the prosecutor's office. Based on the analysis of the current legislation of Ukraine, as well as scientific sources, organizational support is considered in broad and narrow meanings. Thus, in a wide meaning, this concept can be defined as a complex of all measures, means and resources that are necessary for the operation of the prosecutor's office. Elements of organizational support for the prosecutor's office in a broad sense are: personnel support, information support, financing, logistics, innovative and technological support. In a narrow sense, organizational support provides a set of techniques and means aimed at streamlining the work of the prosecutor's office, ensuring its controllability as a system and effective exercise by prosecutors. So organizational support includes the administration of the prosecutor's office and ensuring work in the prosecutor's office. It was concluded that it is necessary to improve the normative regulation of organizational support for the prosecutor's office in section X of the Law of Ukraine «On the prosecutor's office». At the same time, a systematic approach is important, involving formation of an integrated mechanism of organizational support for the activities of the prosecutor's office and identification of the subjects responsible for this. Perspective directions for further scientific researches within the defined topic of the study are used to analyze individual elements of the prosecutor's office, as well as the study of the best practices of the organization of the prosecutor's office.

Identifying Security Requirements Using the Security Quality Requirements Engineering (SQUARE) Method

2007 ◽  
pp. 43-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Mead
Keyword(s):  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Promising Method ◽  
Security Requirements ◽  
Software Systems ◽  
Quality Requirements ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Security Requirements Engineering ◽  
Engineering Institute

In this chapter, we describe general issues in developing security requirements, meth-ods that have been useful, and a method (SQUARE) that can be used for eliciting, analyzing, and documenting security requirements for software systems. SQUARE, which was developed by the CERT Program at Carnegie Mellon University’s Soft-ware Engineering Institute, provides a systematic approach to security requirements engineering. SQUARE has been used on a number of client projects by Carnegie Mellon student teams, prototype tools have been developed, and research is ongoing to improve this promising method.

Identifying Security Requirements Using the Security Quality Requirements Engineering (SQUARE) Method

2008 ◽  
pp. 943-963
Author(s):  
N. R. Mead
Keyword(s):  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Promising Method ◽  
Security Requirements ◽  
Software Systems ◽  
Quality Requirements ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Security Requirements Engineering ◽  
Engineering Institute

In this chapter, we describe general issues in developing security requirements, methods that have been useful, and a method (SQUARE) that can be used for eliciting, analyzing, and documenting security requirements for software systems. SQUARE, which was developed by the CERT Program at Carnegie Mellon University’s Soft-ware Engineering Institute, provides a systematic approach to security requirements engineering. SQUARE has been used on a number of client projects by Carnegie Mellon student teams, prototype tools have been developed, and research is ongoing to improve this promising method.

A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Camburn ◽  
Brock Dunlap ◽  
Tanmay Gurjar ◽  
Christopher Hamon ◽  
Matthew Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Scientific Evaluation ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Design Concepts ◽  
Virtual Prototypes ◽  
Improved Design

Scientific evaluation of prototyping practices is an emerging field in design research. Prototyping is critical to the success of product development efforts, and yet its implementation in practice is often guided by ad hoc experience. To address this need, we seek to advance the study and development of prototyping principles, techniques, and tools. A method to repeatedly enhance the outcome of prototyping efforts is reported in this paper. The research methodology to develop this method is as follows: (1) systematically identify practices that improve prototyping; (2) synthesize these practices to form a guiding method for designers; and (3) validate that the proposed method encourages best practices and improves performance. Prototyping practices are represented as six key heuristics to guide a designer in planning: how many iterations to pursue, how many unique design concepts to explore in parallel, as well as the use of scaled prototypes, isolated subsystem prototypes, relaxed requirements, and virtual prototypes. The method is correlated, through experimental investigation, with increased application of these best practices and improved design performance outcomes. These observations hold across various design problems studied. This method is novel in providing a systematic approach to prototyping.

scholarly journals A Method for Service Agile Construction

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Carvalho ◽  
Leonardo Guerreiro Azevedo ◽  
Gleison Santos
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Service Oriented Architecture ◽  
Distributed Teams ◽  
Agile Methods ◽  
Service Development ◽  
Agile Practices ◽  
Core Practices ◽  
Service Oriented ◽  
Acceptance Tests

Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and agile methods share common drivers. However, there is a lack of guidelines a SOA team should pursue in order to develop services considering best practices, acceptance tests, distributed teams, contract refactoring, among other issues related to SOA principles and agile practices. This work presents a new method that addresses team concerns and needs aiming at a systematic approach for service development using XP's agile practices and SOA principles. We provide best practices, phases and activities that specifically address XP's core practices and service-oriented best practices. We also provide an example of our proposal in order to demonstrate its applicability.

From Failing to Succeeding

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-138
Author(s):  
Julie Thompson Klein
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Boundary Crossing ◽  
Reward Systems ◽  
Litmus Test ◽  
Sector Work

Decades of reports have delineated factors for success. Yet, projects, programs, and fields continue to falter. This final chapter begins by condensing barriers and impediments into a digest of challenges for both crossdisciplinary and cross-sector work. It then elaborates reasons for shortfalls: highlighting impediments to radical forms of interdisciplinarity, questioning the litmus test of integration, and marking persistent limits to developing and sustaining fields and programs. The chapter turns next to six overarching principles for success: transparency; best practices, models, guidelines, and authoritative reports; consistency and alignment of activities in a systematic approach; balance of disciplinary, professional, crossdisciplinary, and cross-sector work; credit for boundary crossing; and appropriate criteria in a multi-methodological approach to evaluation. This section also considers the role of technology, academic reward systems, and responsibility for change. The chapter and the book conclude by returning to the opening question of what constitutes interdisciplinarity, followed by five gateways into the burgeoning body of resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document