Model- and Experiment-Based Evaluation Tools: Tool Demonstration Sessions

Авторы публицистических текстов все чаще отходят от стандартизации речи и клишированности в пользу поиска новых экспрессивных средств выражения оценочности, которые требуют от читателя определенного количества фоновых знаний и разработанной языковой компетенции. В данной статье установлены лексические особенности использования оценочных средств в немецких публицистических текстах, выявлены их разновидности и сферы употребления. Authors of journalistic texts are increasingly moving away from the standardization of speech and cliché in favor of searching for new expressive means of expressing evaluation, which require the reader to have a certain amount of background knowledge and developed language competence. In this article, the lexical features of the use of evaluation tools in German journalistic texts are established, their varieties and areas of use are identified.

Download Full-text

Toxicity Evaluation of Engineered Nanomaterials: Risk Evaluation Tools (Phase 3 Studies)

10.21236/ada590933 ◽

2012 ◽

Author(s):

Saber Hussain ◽

Christin Grabinski ◽

Nicole Schaeublin ◽

Elizabeth Maurer ◽

Mohan Sankaran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Evaluation ◽

Engineered Nanomaterials ◽

Toxicity Evaluation ◽

Evaluation Tools ◽

Phase 3

Download Full-text

A Roadmap to Sequence Assembly Evaluation Tools

Current Bioinformatics ◽

10.2174/1574893615999201111140419 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 ◽

Author(s):

Sara El-Metwally ◽

Eslam Hamouda ◽

Mayada Tarek

Keyword(s):

Data Analysis ◽

Evaluation Process ◽

Sequence Assembly ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Accurate Information ◽

End User ◽

Evaluation Tools ◽

Assembly Evaluation ◽

Assembly Pipeline ◽

Evaluation Approaches

: The assembly evaluation process is the starting step towards meaningful downstream data analysis. We need to know how much accurate information is included in an assembled sequence before going further to any data analysis stage. Four basic metrics are targeted by different assembly evaluation tools: contiguity, accuracy, completeness, and contamination. Some tools evaluate these metrics based on comparing the assembly results to a closely related reference. Others utilize different types of heuristics to overcome the missing of a guiding reference, such as the consistency between assembly results and sequencing reads. In this paper, we discuss the assembly evaluation process as a core stage in any sequence assembly pipeline and present a roadmap that is followed by most assembly evaluation tools to assess different metrics. We highlight the challenges that currently exist in the assembly evaluation tools and summarize their technical and practical details to help the end-users choose the best tool according to their working scenarios. To address the similarities/differences among different assembly assessment tools, including their evaluation approaches, metrics, comprehensive nature, limitations, usability and how the evaluated results are presented to the end-user, we provide a practical example for evaluating Velvet assembly results for S. aureus dataset from GAGE competition. A Github repository (https://github.com/SaraEl-Metwally/Assembly-Evaluation-Tools) is created for evaluation result details along with their generated command line parameters.

Download Full-text