Understanding the Impact of Artefact-Based RE -- Design of a Replication Study

Author(s):  
Birgit Penzenstadler ◽  
Daniel Mendez Fernandez ◽  
Jonas Eckhardt
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. e123-e124
Author(s):  
M. Engelhardt ◽  
D. Komnenić ◽  
F. Roth ◽  
L. Kawelke ◽  
L. Fekonja ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Bailes ◽  
Mary Caldwell ◽  
Erin J. Wamsley ◽  
Matthew A. Tucker

AbstractAcross a broad spectrum of memory tasks, retention is superior following a night of sleep compared to a day of wake. However, this result alone does not clarify whether sleep merely slows the forgetting that would otherwise occur as a result of information processing during wakefulness, or whether sleep actually consolidates memories, protecting them from subsequent retroactive interference. Two influential studies (Ellenbogen, et al., 2006, 2009) suggested that sleep protects memories against the subsequent retroactive interference that occurs when participants learn new yet overlapping information (interference learning). In these studies, interference was much less detrimental to memory following a night of sleep compared to a day of wakefulness, a finding that provided strong evidence that sleep supports this important aspect of memory consolidation. In the current well-powered replication study, we repeated the protocol of Ellenbogen, et al. (2009) and, additionally, we examined the impact of intrinsic motivation on performance in sleep and wake participants. We were unable to replicate the finding that sleep protects memories against retroactive interference, with the detrimental effects of interference learning being essentially the same in wake and sleep participants. We also found that while intrinsic motivation benefitted task acquisition it was not a modulator of sleep-wake differences in memory processing. These finding of this replication study draw into question the claim that sleep protects memories against the effects of retroactive interference, and moreover, they highlight the importance of replicating key findings in the study of sleep’s impact on memory processing before drawing strong conclusions that drive the direction of future research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-89
Author(s):  
Monika Ekiert ◽  
Kristen di Gennaro

AbstractThis study replicates Bitchener and Knoch (2010), which reported that written corrective feedback (WCF) targeting two single-rule English article functions (first mention a and subsequent mention the) is effective. The current replication study repeats the original study in most respects but adds to the assessment of the intervention's efficacy by recording the impact of focused WCF on all functional article uses, and not just on the two uses targeted by the WCF. The results of the replication study partially confirm Bitchener & Knoch's results and introduce some further differentiated findings. It is concluded that while the focused WCF leads to increased accuracy in the targeted functions of articles, the same WCF may negatively impact the remaining non-targeted article functions, especially for the group that received the most explicit WCF in the form of metalinguistic explanation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 003452372110145
Author(s):  
Jo Trowsdale ◽  
Ursula McKenna ◽  
Leslie J Francis

In order to evaluate the impact of The Imagineerium a 10-week educational project, teachers were asked to observe and rate the behaviour of a pilot sample of 135 participating students both at the beginning and at the end of the 10-week period. Scores recorded on the seven-item Trowsdale Index of Teacher Observation of Student Creativity (TITOSC) showed a significant increase between time one and time two. In order to test the reproducibility of these findings the same index was employed a year later in a replication study among 139 students. On this occasion also, scores recorded on the seven-item Trowsdale Index of Teacher Observation of Student Creativity showed a significant increase between time one and time two. These data support the effectiveness of educational experience in enhancing teacher perception of creativity displayed by individual students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document