scholarly journals Approximation Algorithms for QMA-Complete Problems

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevag Gharibian ◽  
Julia Kempe
Keyword(s):  
Approximation Algorithms ◽  
Complete Problems

Approximating P-Complete Problems

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Greenlaw ◽  
H. James Hoover ◽  
Walter L. Ruzzo
Keyword(s):  
Approximation Algorithms ◽  
Bin Packing ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Packing Problem ◽  
Maximal Independent Set ◽  
Set Size ◽  
Complete Problems ◽  
Speed Up ◽  
Sequential Approximation ◽  
Parallel Approximation

Suppose that finding the solution to a problem is P-complete. It is natural to ask if it is any easier to obtain an approximate solution. For decision problems this might mean considering the corresponding combinatorial optimization problem. That is, a problem in which we try to minimize or maximize a given quantity. As one might expect from the theory of NP-completeness, the answer is both yes (for example in the case of Bin Packing, Problem A.4.7) and no (for example in the case of the Lexicographically First Maximal Independent Set Size Problem, see Lemma 10.2.2.). There are several motivations for developing good NC approximation algorithms. First, in all likelihood P-complete problems cannot be solved fast in parallel. Therefore, it may be useful to approximate them quickly in parallel. Second, problems that are P- complete but that can be approximated well seem to be special boundary cases. Perhaps by examining these types of problems more closely we can improve our understanding of parallelism. Third, it is important to build a theoretical foundation for studying and classifying additional approximation problems. Finally, it may be possible to speed up sequential approximation algorithms, of NP-complete problems, using fast parallel approximations. Our goal in this section is to develop the basic theory of parallel approximation algorithms. We begin by showing that certain P-complete problems are not amenable to NC approximation algorithms. Later we present examples of P-complete problems that can be approximated well in parallel. We start by considering the Lexicographically First Maximal Independent Set Problem, introduced in Definition 7.1.1, and proven P-complete in Problem A.2.1. As defined, LFMIS it is not directly amenable to approximation. We can phrase the problem in terms of computing the size of the independent set. Definition 10.2.1 Lexicographically First Maximal Independent Set Size (LFMISsize) Given: An undirected graph G = (V, E) with an ordering on the vertices and an integer k. Problem: Is the size of the lexicographically first maximal independent set of G less than or equal to k ? The following lemma shows that computing just the size of the lexicographically first maximal independent set is P-complete.

scholarly journals Approximation Algorithms for QMA-Complete Problems

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 1028-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevag Gharibian ◽  
Julia Kempe
Keyword(s):  
Approximation Algorithms ◽  
Complete Problems

scholarly journals Improving the Smoothed Complexity of FLIP for Max Cut Problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
Ali Bibak ◽  
Charles Carlson ◽  
Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran
Keyword(s):  
General Framework ◽  
Edge Weight ◽  
Complete Graphs ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Weight Density ◽  
Complete Problems ◽  
Substantial Progress ◽  
Run Time ◽  
Optimum Solution ◽  
Arbitrary Graphs

Finding locally optimal solutions for MAX-CUT and MAX- k -CUT are well-known PLS-complete problems. An instinctive approach to finding such a locally optimum solution is the FLIP method. Even though FLIP requires exponential time in worst-case instances, it tends to terminate quickly in practical instances. To explain this discrepancy, the run-time of FLIP has been studied in the smoothed complexity framework. Etscheid and Röglin (ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 2017) showed that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for max-cut in arbitrary graphs is quasi-polynomial. Angel, Bubeck, Peres, and Wei (STOC, 2017) showed that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for max-cut in complete graphs is ( O Φ 5 n 15.1 ), where Φ is an upper bound on the random edge-weight density and Φ is the number of vertices in the input graph. While Angel, Bubeck, Peres, and Wei’s result showed the first polynomial smoothed complexity, they also conjectured that their run-time bound is far from optimal. In this work, we make substantial progress toward improving the run-time bound. We prove that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for max-cut in complete graphs is O (Φ n 7.83 ). Our results are based on a carefully chosen matrix whose rank captures the run-time of the method along with improved rank bounds for this matrix and an improved union bound based on this matrix. In addition, our techniques provide a general framework for analyzing FLIP in the smoothed framework. We illustrate this general framework by showing that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for MAX-3-CUT in complete graphs is polynomial and for MAX - k - CUT in arbitrary graphs is quasi-polynomial. We believe that our techniques should also be of interest toward showing smoothed polynomial complexity of FLIP for MAX - k - CUT in complete graphs for larger constants k .

Approximation Algorithms for Submodular Data Summarization with a Knapsack Constraint

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Kai Han ◽  
Shuang Cui ◽  
Tianshuai Zhu ◽  
Enpei Zhang ◽  
Benwei Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Approximation Algorithms ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Randomized Algorithm ◽  
Deterministic Algorithm ◽  
Submodular Function ◽  
Approximation Ratio ◽  
Performance Bounds ◽  
Data Summarization ◽  
Submodular Optimization ◽  
Knapsack Constraint

Data summarization, i.e., selecting representative subsets of manageable size out of massive data, is often modeled as a submodular optimization problem. Although there exist extensive algorithms for submodular optimization, many of them incur large computational overheads and hence are not suitable for mining big data. In this work, we consider the fundamental problem of (non-monotone) submodular function maximization with a knapsack constraint, and propose simple yet effective and efficient algorithms for it. Specifically, we propose a deterministic algorithm with approximation ratio 6 and a randomized algorithm with approximation ratio 4, and show that both of them can be accelerated to achieve nearly linear running time at the cost of weakening the approximation ratio by an additive factor of ε. We then consider a more restrictive setting without full access to the whole dataset, and propose streaming algorithms with approximation ratios of 8+ε and 6+ε that make one pass and two passes over the data stream, respectively. As a by-product, we also propose a two-pass streaming algorithm with an approximation ratio of 2+ε when the considered submodular function is monotone. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithms achieve the best performance bounds compared to the state-of-the-art approximation algorithms with efficient implementation for the same problem. Finally, we evaluate our algorithms in two concrete submodular data summarization applications for revenue maximization in social networks and image summarization, and the empirical results show that our algorithms outperform the existing ones in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency.

scholarly journals Approximation Algorithms for Maximin Fair Division

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Siddharth Barman ◽  
Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy
Keyword(s):  
Approximation Algorithms ◽  
Fair Division
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document