Top-down design process for gate-level combinational logic design

1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.S. Sandige
Author(s):  
Ivo Ganchev

This article documents the academic writing course design process for advanced Chinese learners aiming to pursue postgraduate degrees in business-related fields at their respective target universities in the UK. Four holders of BA degrees in the social sciences from second tier universities in Beijing were tested, surveyed and observed in detail to design a non-terminal twenty-hour pre-sessional writing course (ten two-hour sessions) to assist in their preparation for postgraduate study. All students held offers from Russell Group universities in the UK and had covered the IELTS requirement (6.5-7.0) for admission there prior to signing up for the EAP course discussed in this paper. The aim of the course is to enhance the students’ academic skills and improve their performance in the following year when they attend UK universities. The course design process is informed by two sets of principles, incorporating both a top-down and a bottom-up perspective. The former is framed within an understanding of EAP as academic, rather than language training. The latter is based on needs analysis of student-specific weaknesses explored through the use of a questionnaire, a diagnostic writing test and in-class observations. Both perspectives feed into the course goals and objectives which serve as a basis for the course rationale. Aiming to bridge the gap between Chinese undergraduate and UK postgraduate study, the course combines textbooks with authentic materials and formative with summative assessment. Reflections on major constraints and limitations are provided throughout the process. This documented case of academic writing course design aims to reveal challenges faced by EAP practitioners working with UK and Chinese institutions, and to present a middle ground approach to resolving tensions between top-down and bottom-up pressures in the context of course design for advanced Chinese graduates.


Author(s):  
R. Mantripragada ◽  
D. E. Whitney

Abstract In order to be able to lay out, analyze, outsource, assemble, and debug complex assemblies, we need ways to capture their fundamental structure in a top-down design process, including the designer’s strategy for kinematically constraining and locating the parts accurately with respect to each other. We describe a concept called the “Datum Flow Chain” to capture this logic. The DFC relates the datum logic explicitly to the product’s key characteristics, assembly sequences, and choice of mating features, and provides the information needed for tolerance analyses. Two types of assemblies are addressed: Type-1 where the assembly process puts parts together at their prefabricated mating features, and Type-2 where the assembly process can incorporate in-process adjustments to redistribute variation. Two types of assembly joints are defined: mates that pass dimensional constraint from part to part, and contacts that merely provide support. The scope of DFC in assembly planning is presented using several examples. Analysis tools to evaluate different DFCs and select the ones of interest are also presented.


Author(s):  
Sarah L. Harris ◽  
David Harris

Author(s):  
P. Franciosa ◽  
S. Gerbino

The need for a designer to have a tool able to do motion and constraint analysis, to check for the under-constrained and/or over-constrained status of an assembly, is strategic in a design contest where several changes are made during the design process by using CAD. Traditional kinematic tools provide little information on over-constraints at 3D level. Screw theory has been already used in mechanical assemblies, in a top-down design, to do motion and constraint analysis. This theory is here used to analyze mechanical assemblies in the contest of a feature-based CAD system. The structure of the CAD assembly is captured and described as assembly graph, similar to Datum Flow Chain, through which the motion or constraint status of any part (in terms of twist and wrench matrices), can be obtained. The underlying algorithm is based on the Kirchoff’s rules successfully applied by Davies to mechanisms. How to automatically create the assembly graph, detect the useful loops and then write the loop kinematic equations is described. Three case studies are presented related to CAD assemblies of mechanisms built up in SolidWorks® CAD system by Dassault Systemes from which assembly constraints have been acquired.


1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 792-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Yano ◽  
Y. Sasaki ◽  
K. Rikino ◽  
K. Seki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document