scholarly journals Modulo scheduling with reduced register pressure

1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Llosa ◽  
M. Valero ◽  
E. Agyuade ◽  
A. Gonzalez
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Oppermann ◽  
Melanie Reuter-Oppermann ◽  
Lukas Sommer ◽  
Andreas Koch ◽  
Oliver Sinnen

1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Stotzer ◽  
Ernst Leiss

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33
Author(s):  
Maxim Golubev ◽  
Andrey Shmakov

The work presents the results of application of panoramic interferential technique which is based on elastic layers (sensors) usage to obtain pressure distribution on the flat plate having sharp leading edge. Experiments were done in supersonic wind tunnel at Mach number M = 4. Sensitivity and response time are shown to be enough to register pressure pulsation against standing and traveling sensor surface waves. Applying high-frequency image acquiring is demonstrated to make possible to distinguish at visualization images high-speed disturbances propagating in the boundary layer from low-speed surface waves


2018 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 03008
Author(s):  
Xuehua Liu ◽  
Liping Ding ◽  
Yanfeng Li ◽  
Guangxuan Chen ◽  
Jin Du

Register pressure problem has been a known problem for compiler because of the mismatch between the infinite number of pseudo registers and the finite number of hard registers. Too heavy register pressure may results in register spilling and then leads to performance degradation. There are a lot of optimizations, especially loop optimizations suffer from register spilling in compiler. In order to fight register pressure and therefore improve the effectiveness of compiler, this research takes the register pressure into account to improve loop unrolling optimization during the transformation process. In addition, a register pressure aware transformation is able to reduce the performance overhead of some fine-grained randomization transformations which can be used to defend against ROP attacks. Experiments showed a peak improvement of about 3.6% and an average improvement of about 1% for SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks and a peak improvement of about 3% and an average improvement of about 1% for the LINPACK benchmark.


Author(s):  
Julian Oppermann ◽  
Patrick Sittel ◽  
Martin Kumm ◽  
Melanie Reuter-Oppermann ◽  
Andreas Koch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document