REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT: CAPITAL INVESTMENT PRIORITISATION IN THE UK

1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 40-62
Author(s):  
Kweku Appiah‐Adu ◽  
Robert E. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Real Estate Investment ◽  
Investment Capital ◽  
The Uk

scholarly journals ASSESSING REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVES: A MULTI-CRITERIA AND MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DECISION AID TOOL

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios A. Mantogiannis ◽  
Fotios A. Katsigiannis
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Real Estate Investment ◽  
Solution Approach ◽  
Decision Environment ◽  
Multi Stakeholder ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Severe Uncertainty

Investment decisions in private real-estate demand the consideration of several qualitative and quantitative criteria, as well as the different or even conflicting interests of the participating stakeholders. Meanwhile, certain indicators are subject to severe uncertainty, which will eventually alter the expected outcome of the investment decision. Even though multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques have been extensively used in real-estate investment appraisals, there is limited evidence from the private rented sector, which constitutes a large part of the existing real estate assets. The existing approaches are not designed to capture the inherent variability of the decision environment, and they do not always achieve a consensus among the participating actors. In this work, through a rigorous literature review, we were able to identify a comprehensive list of assessment criteria, which were further validated through an iterative Delphi-based consensus-making process. The selected criteria were then used to construct an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model evaluating four real world, real estate investment alternatives from the UK private rented market. The volatility of the financial performance indicators was grasped through several Monte Carlo simulation runs. We tested the described solution approach with preference data obtained by seven senior real estate decision-makers. Our computational results suggest that financial performance is the main group of selection criteria. However, the sensitivity of the outcome indicates that location and property characteristics may greatly affect real estate investment decisions.

Financing housing investment

2020 ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Bob Colenutt
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Real Estate Investment Trusts ◽  
Housing Finance ◽  
Quantitative Easing ◽  
Housing Crisis ◽  
Real Estate Investment ◽  
Role Of Government ◽  
Housing Investment ◽  
The Uk

This chapter looks at the overburdening presence of property and housing finance in the UK economy. It focuses on the economic instability created by mortgage dependency. This is a critical context for understanding the role of Government in creating barriers to resolving the housing crisis though its programme of Quantitative Easing, encouragement of Real Estate Investment Trusts, and by offering tax and residence advantages for overseas investors in UK property. It also explores the rise of investor interest in Build to Rent.

The past, present and future of the non-traded NAV REIT structure

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
David H. Roberts ◽  
Ettore A. Santucci ◽  
Mark Schonberger ◽  
Peter W. Lavigne
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Smooth Curve ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Financial Advisors ◽  
Real Estate Investment ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
Management Fees ◽  
The Uk

Purpose Over 15 years ago Goodwin created the first open-ended, non-traded real estate investment trust (REIT) with regular sales and redemptions at net asset value (“NAV REIT”). While NAV REITs are now well established, there is still room for improvement. Design/methodology/approach We traced the evolution of the NAV REIT’s innovative, investor-friendly features – transparent valuation to strike NAV, liquidity via redemption at NAV per share, indefinite life, lower/simpler selling and management fees, share classes with different upfront loads and trailing distribution fees. Findings To improve the liquidity feature of NAV REITs, share classes could be used to lower the drag on performance and match available liquid assets with expected redemption requests. The goal: balance inflows and outflows, optimize portfolio construction, and better safeguard liquidity. Practical implications One need not look far for the dark side of liquidity in open-ended real estate funds. The UK experience with regulated property funds is a painful object lesson. There is a better way: while traditional non-traded REITs were designed and marketed for investment by retail investors, NAV REITs appeal to a diverse range of investors, and share classes could be enhanced to offer both a menu of selling loads and a menu of liquidity and dividend-rate options to produce a smooth curve blending cost and time. Originality/value Innovation in structuring real estate investment vehicles has broadened choices for all and the NAV REIT is flexible, scalable, open-ended and cost-efficient. Fund sponsors, fund managers, financial advisors, investors and even regulators could find food for thought in our analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document