scholarly journals Effect of Changes in Shoot Carbon-Exchange Rate on Soybean Root Nodule Activity

1982 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 432-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry E. Williams ◽  
Theodore M. Dejong ◽  
Donald A. Phillips
Crop Science ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Sheehy ◽  
K. A. Fishbeck ◽  
D. A. Phillips

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligita Baležentienė ◽  
Ovidijus Mikša ◽  
Tomas Baležentis ◽  
Dalia Streimikiene

Intelligent agricultural solutions require data on the environmental impacts of agriculture. In order for operationalize decision-making for sustainable agriculture, one needs to establish the corresponding datasets and protocols. Increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions into the atmosphere force the choice of growing crops aimed at mitigating climate change. For this reason, investigations of seasonal carbon exchange were carried out in 2013–2016 at the Training Farm of the Vytautas Magnus University (former Aleksandras Stulginskis University), Lithuania. This paper compares the carbon exchange rate for different crops, viz., maize, ley, winter wheat, spring rapeseed and barley under conventional farming. This study focuses on the carbon exchange rate. We measure the emitted and absorbed CO2 fluxes by applying the closed chamber method. The biomass measurement and leaf area index (LAI) calculations at different plant growth stages are used to evaluate carbon exchange in different agroecosystems. The differences in photosynthetically assimilated CO2 rates were significantly impacted by the leaf area index (p = 0.04) during the plant vegetation period. The significantly (p = 0.02–0.05) strong correlation (r = 0.6–0.7) exists between soil respiration and LAI. Soil respiration composed only 21% of the agroecosystem carbon exchange. Plant respiration ranged between 0.034 and 3.613 µmol m−2 s−1 during the vegetation period composed of a negligible ratio (mean 16%) of carbon exchange. Generally, respiration emissions were obviously recovered by the gross primary production (GPP) of crops. Therefore, the ecosystems were acting as an atmospheric CO2 sink. Barley accumulated the lowest mean GPP 12.77 µmol m−2 s−1. The highest mean GPP was determined for ley (14.28 µmol m−2 s−1) and maize (15.68 µmol m−2 s−1) due to the biggest LAI and particular bio-characteristics. Due to the highest NEP, the ley (12.66 µmol m−2 s−1) and maize (12.76 µmol m−2 s−1) agroecosystems sank the highest C from the atmosphere and, thus, they might be considered the most sustainable items between crops. Consequently, the appropriate choice of crops and their area in crop rotations may reduce CO2 emissions and their impact on the environment and climate change.


1973 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1493-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley D. Dunn ◽  
Robert V. Klucas

Glutamine amide–2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase NAD+ oxidoreductase (GOGAT), glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamate dehydrogenase (GD), and alanine dehydrogenase (AD) were studied in soybean root nodules. GS, GOGAT, and AD were present in bacteroids at levels that could account for ammonium assimilation, but GD activity was quite low. The total activities of GS and GD were higher in the cytosol than in the bacteroids by factors of 20 and 7, respectively, whereas GOGAT was not detected in the cytosol. GS (transferase activity) was inhibited by alanine, CTP, glycine, and tryptophan at 5 mM but was relatively unaffected by asparagine, aspartic acid, CMP, glucosamine, and histidine at 5 mM. GOGAT activity was unaffected by ATP, ADP, 8-hydroxyquinoline, and 1,10-phenanthroline but was inhibited by EDTA, citrate, and parachloromercuribenzoate. GOGAT activity (reductive amination) was also inhibited 97% by preincubation with 10−4 M azaserine for 30 min but GD activity was inhibited only 13%. The apparent Km values for NH4+ by AD was 7.4 × 10−3 M and by GD was 7.3 × 10−2 M while for glutamine by GOGAT it was 9.3 × 10−5 M. Activities and kinetic properties for these enzymes may suggest potential routes of nitrogen assimilation in vivo.


Biochemistry ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
pp. 4731-4738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalju Kahn ◽  
Peter A. Tipton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document