scholarly journals Arabidopsis in Planta Transformation. Uses, Mechanisms, and Prospects for Transformation of Other Species

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 1540-1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew F. Bent
2011 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 898-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthikala Manoj Kumar ◽  
Kalpana N. Reddy ◽  
M. Manjulatha ◽  
Elizabeth S. Arellano ◽  
Rohini Sreevathsa ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Mamontova ◽  
V. A. Velikov ◽  
I. V. Volokhina ◽  
M. I. Chumakov

2006 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Supartana ◽  
Tsutomu Shimizu ◽  
Masahiro Nogawa ◽  
Hidenari Shioiri ◽  
Tadashi Nakajima ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (No. 4) ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Niazian ◽  
S.A. Sadat Noori ◽  
P. Galuszka ◽  
S.M.M. Mortazavian

Gene transformation can be done in direct and indirect (Agrobacterium-mediated) ways. The most efficient method of gene transformation to date is Agrobacterium-mediated method. The main problem of Agrobacterium-method is that some plant species and mutant lines are recalcitrant to regeneration. Requirements for sterile conditions for plant regeneration are another problem of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Development of genotype-independent gene transformation method is of great interest in many plants. Some tissue culture-independent Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation methods are reported in individual plants and crops. Generally, these methods are called in planta gene transformation. In planta transformation methods are free from somaclonal variation and easier, quicker, and simpler than tissue culture-based transformation methods. Vacuum infiltration, injection of Agrobacterium culture to plant tissues, pollen-tube pathway, floral dip and floral spray are the main methods of in planta transformation. Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. Simplicity and reliability are the primary reasons for the popularity of the in planta methods. These methods are much quicker than regular tissue culture-based Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation and success can be achieved by non-experts. In the present review, we highlight all methods of in planta transformation comparing them with regular tissue culture-based Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods and then recently successful transformations using these methods are presented.


Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Erninda Oktaviani Suputri ◽  
Rindang Dwiyani ◽  
Ida Ayu Putri Darmawanti ◽  
Bambang Sugiharto

The SoSPS1 gene of sugar cane plants previously subjected to Agrobacterium tumefacienmediated cloning was to be transferred to citrus plants to increase metabolism of sucrose in plant. The T-DNA harbored the SoSPS1 gene under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter from the cauliflower mosaic virus and contained the NPTII gene (kanamycin resistance gene) as a selectable marker for transformant selection. Generally, gene transformation in plants is carried out by tissue culture. However, tissue culture has several disadvantages such as its being time-consuming, its sometimes resulting in somatic mutations and somaclonal variations, and the requirement of sterile conditions in the procedure of gene transfer. In planta transformation is a useful system for those plants that lack tissue culture and regeneration system. The main function of in planta transformation is to recover the advantages of tissue culture as an efficient, quick method, including its ability to produce a large number of transgenic plants and to accumulate a high concentration of total soluble protein in short time. There are two procedures of in planta transformation for the seeds of citrus plants, namely “prick and coat” and “seed tip-cutting and imbibition”. In the prick and coat method, seeds are pricked on their entire surfaces and smeared with a suspension of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In the seed tip-cutting and imbibition method, on the other hand, seeds are cut at the tip and soaked in a suspension of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The leaves derived from seeds treatment were taken as samples for DNA extraction and PCR using primers of the NPTII gene (Forward: 5’-GTCATCTCACCTTCCTCCTGCC-3’; Reverse: 5’-GTCGCTTGGTCGGTCATTTCG-3’). This research found that only the seed tip-cutting and imbibition plants amplified along the 550-bp band, while those of the prick and coat method did not. Additionally, the T-DNA was successfully integrated into the genome of the plants treated with the seed tip-cutting and imbibition method but not with the prick and coat.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document