scholarly journals Understanding the importance of graduate admissions criteria according to prospective graduate students

Author(s):  
Deepa Chari ◽  
Geoff Potvin
2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 481-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Eric Landrum ◽  
Jeremy Clark

Ratings of importance were reviewed for nine graduate admissions criteria for the 573 graduate degree programs listed in American Psychological Association's Graduate Study in Psychology (2003). Overall, the three criteria receiving the highest percentages of importance ratings were letters of recommendation, statement of goals and objectives, and grade point average. Importance ratings varied depending on the degree programs offered. Results are discussed in terms of the advice offered students interested in admission to graduate school and the importance of students tailoring their graduate admissions process to their specific degree program.


1982 ◽  
Vol 51 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1149-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford M. De Cato

The Graduate Record Exam, Miller's Analogies, and GPA have long been used as composite parts of admissions requirements to graduate schools in psychology. Questions have been raised about the predictive validity of these standardized scores for performance in professional schools. 58 graduate students in the Hahnemann Psy. D. program were followed, comparing their three scores submitted on admission to their scores achieved in a course in Rorschach scoring. The relationship between performance in the course and these standardized measures was not significant. The three scores did not predict achievement of Rorschach scoring skills. Limitations of the present study are discussed with reference to the need for more research relating entrance requirements to specific competencies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-162
Author(s):  
Christa Boske ◽  
Chinasa Elue

This case outlines a dilemma encountered by faculty in a K-12 educational administration graduate program on the east coast. The case offers a detailed illustration of tensions arising when faculty discuss their graduate admissions process, their role as gatekeepers, understandings of merit, and the need for student diversity. Disrupting institutional systems of domination and faculty reliance on admissions criteria undermine programmatic diversity goals, including the meanings faculty associate with common admissions criteria. Implications include an authentic, holistic, and intentional examination of graduate admissions criteria.


2021 ◽  
pp. 99-123
Author(s):  
Raquel E. Aldana ◽  
Josephine M. Moreno

AbstractThe sustainability of ADVANCE, beyond its early successes at UC Davis, largely depends on whether it can propel the types of transformational changes needed to fulfill ADVANCE’s own aspirations. One of these aspirations is to change the face of STEM at UC Davis. Transformational change must consider the pipeline of Latinx and other underrepresented students into all doctoral programs, including but not limited to STEM. This chapter addresses the need to expand on the ADVANCE initiative to grow the pool of doctoral underrepresented minority (URM) students at UC Davis and nationally, as well as to promote their integration into successful careers after graduation, as professors, scientists, or professionals who go on to become leaders in government or industry. At UC Davis, these efforts have already begun in earnest and include visionary changes to revamp recruitment practices for graduate students, transform graduate admissions practices, and improve mentoring of students during and after completion of their programs. This chapter explores these efforts at UC Davis and summarizes the lessons learned from their implementation.


1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 960-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse E. Purdy ◽  
Robert C. Reinehr ◽  
Jon D. Swartz

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1107-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Cashin ◽  
R. Eric Landrum

36 undergraduate psychology majors from the University of Wisconsin—Platteville completed a questionnaire by listing what they believed to be relevant criteria in the admissions process for graduate school. Students subsequently rank-ordered by importance each of the criteria they generated. Their list of criteria was similar to those of previous studies; however, the relative importance of the criteria differed substantially between the present study and previous ones. Faculty advising students about graduate school may want to use this information to help students better understand the graduate school admissions process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document