scholarly journals Critical Equation of State from the Average Action

1996 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 873-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Berges ◽  
N. Tetradis ◽  
C. Wetterich
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Calabrese ◽  
Martino De Prato ◽  
Andrea Pelissetto ◽  
Ettore Vicari

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 2009-2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
MASSIMO CAMPOSTRINI ◽  
PAOLO ROSSI ◽  
ETTORE VICARI ◽  
MARTIN HASENBUSCH ◽  
ANDREA PELISSETTO

Three-dimensional spin models of the Ising and XY universality classes are studied by a combination of high-temperature expansions and Monte Carlo simulations applied to improved Hamiltonians. The critical exponents and the critical equation of state are determined to very high precision.


2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (14) ◽  
pp. 2923-2948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Caselle ◽  
Martin Hasenbusch ◽  
Andrea Pelissetto ◽  
Ettore Vicari

2000 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 5843-5854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Campostrini ◽  
Andrea Pelissetto ◽  
Paolo Rossi ◽  
Ettore Vicari

1999 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 3526-3563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Campostrini ◽  
Andrea Pelissetto ◽  
Paolo Rossi ◽  
Ettore Vicari

1998 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. BARRIO ◽  
J.R. SOLANA

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (PR5) ◽  
pp. Pr5-281-Pr5-286
Author(s):  
M. Ross ◽  
L. H. Yang ◽  
G. Galli

1980 ◽  
Vol 41 (C2) ◽  
pp. C2-83-C2-83
Author(s):  
Ph. Choquard
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-324
Author(s):  
Syukrani Kadir

periodically in preparing learning plans, implementing learning, assessing learning achievement, carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement that can improve teacher performance. This performance improvement is through periodic collaborative educational supervision. Based on the results of educational supervision in cycle I and cycle II, teacher performance increased, namely in cycle I, teacher performance in preparing learning plans in cycle I reached 71.98%, while cycle II was 92.44%. Teacher performance in implementing learning cycle I reached 72.44% while cycle II reached 93.81%. Teacher performance in assessing learning achievement in cycle Im reached 81.30% while cycle II was 90.56%. Teacher performance in carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement in the first cycle reached 59.76% while the second cycle was 83.00%. Thus, the average action cycle II was above 75.00%. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the teacher's performance has increased in preparing learning plans, implementing learning, assessing learning achievement, carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document