Reply to the comments of Walker and Will regarding the axially symmetric gravitational two-body problem

1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 3438-3440
Author(s):  
F. I. Cooperstock
1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 3433-3437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Walker ◽  
Clifford M. Will

1975 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. I. Cooperstock

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. I. Cooperstock ◽  
P. H. Lim

We present the new formula for gravitational-radiation energy loss that replaces the familiar quadrupole formula. The new formula helps to clarify why the quadrupole formula works when it does. The origin of the correction tensor is discussed and then applied to the axially symmetric two-body problem. With the conventional equation of state, ε = ε(P), the correction tensor vanishes and the radiation is that of the bulk-motion quadrupole formula. This is to be compared with our earlier result with an unconventional equation of state giving more radiation and with that of critics claiming dominant radiation via internal motions with the quadrupole formula. An order-of-magnitude calculation is performed for a binary system, where it is found that there is the potential for contributions from nonlinear terms to be as significant as those from the linear terms after(Gm/α)−5/6 orbits. This occurs after ~102 years for the binary pulsar PSR1913 + 16.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document