Shell effect in the mean square charge radii and magnetic moments of bismuth isotopes near N=126

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Barzakh ◽  
D. V. Fedorov ◽  
V. S. Ivanov ◽  
P. L. Molkanov ◽  
F. V. Moroz ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Barzakh ◽  
L. Kh. Batist ◽  
D. V. Fedorov ◽  
V. S. Ivanov ◽  
K. A. Mezilev ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Barzakh ◽  
L. Kh. Batist ◽  
D. V. Fedorov ◽  
V. S. Ivanov ◽  
P. L. Molkanov ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 728 ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ferrer ◽  
N. Bree ◽  
T.E. Cocolios ◽  
I.G. Darby ◽  
H. De Witte ◽  
...  

The frequency-dependent susceptibility of the molecules and of the electromagnetic field is used to calculate the force between two molecules at zero temperature. The field susceptibility at imaginary frequency, which is the Laplace transform of the retarded potentials, is found from the commutation relations, otherwise we do not need quantum field theory. A method of ‘images’ gives the force between a molecule and a conducting wall, and then we find the susceptibility of the field in the presence of the second molecule. This used to deduce the energy of the first one, and at long distances it turns out to be proportional to the mean square electric field produced by the second molecule. A reduced Hamiltonian involving only the electric and magnetic moments of the molecules gives the simplest proof and agrees with Casimir & Polder’s theory (1948).


1985 ◽  
Vol 321 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Ahmad ◽  
W. Klempt ◽  
C. Ekstr�m ◽  
R. Neugart ◽  
K. Wendt

1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Borchert ◽  
O. W. B. Schult ◽  
J. Speth ◽  
P. G. Hansen ◽  
B. Jonson ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 227-228
Author(s):  
Y. Requième

In spite of important delays in the initial planning, the full automation of the Bordeaux meridian circle is progressing well and will be ready for regular observations by the middle of the next year. It is expected that the mean square error for one observation will be about ±0.”10 in the two coordinates for declinations up to 87°.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Magarini ◽  
Arnaldo Spalvieri ◽  
Guido Tartara

2018 ◽  
Vol 934 (4) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
V.I. Salnikov

The question of calculating the limiting values of residuals in geodesic constructions is considered in the case when the limiting value for measurement errors is assumed equal to 3m, ie ∆рred = 3m, where m is the mean square error of the measurement. Larger errors are rejected. At present, the limiting value for the residual is calculated by the formula 3m√n, where n is the number of measurements. The article draws attention to two contradictions between theory and practice arising from the use of this formula. First, the formula is derived from the classical law of the normal Gaussian distribution, and it is applied to the truncated law of the normal distribution. And, secondly, as shown in [1], when ∆рred = 2m, the sums of errors naturally take the value equal to ?pred, after which the number of errors in the sum starts anew. This article establishes its validity for ∆рred = 3m. A table of comparative values of the tolerances valid and recommended for more stringent ones is given. The article gives a graph of applied and recommended tolerances for ∆рred = 3m.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document