Absolute differential cross section measurements for proton-deuteron elastic scattering at 641.3 and 792.7 MeV

1991 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 2067-2076 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gülmez ◽  
S. Beedoe ◽  
T. Jaroszewicz ◽  
A. G. Ling ◽  
C. A. Whitten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Absolute Differential

Absolute differential cross section measurements for proton-proton elastic scattering at 647 and 800 MeV

1976 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1545-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. B. Willard ◽  
B. D. Anderson ◽  
H. W. Baer ◽  
R. J. Barrett ◽  
P. R. Bevington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Proton Proton ◽  
Absolute Differential ◽  
Proton Elastic Scattering

Differential cross-section measurements in positron–argon collisions

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 505-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Finch ◽  
Á. Kövér ◽  
M. Charlton ◽  
G. Laricchia
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Inelastic Scattering ◽  
Energy Range ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Coupling Effect ◽  
Channel Coupling ◽  
Scattering Cross

Differential cross sections for elastic scattering and ionization in positron–argon collisions as a function of energy (40–150 eV) are reported at 60°. Of particular interest is the energy range 55–60 eV, where earlier measurements by the Detroit group found a drop in the elastic-scattering cross section of a factor of 2. This structure has been tentatively attributed to a cross channel-coupling effect with an open inelastic-scattering channel, most likely ionization. Our results indicate that ionization remains an important channel over the same energy range and only begins to decrease at an energy above 60 eV.

scholarly journals Differential Cross Section Measurements of the $^{12}C(d,p_{1,2,3})^{13}C$ Reaction, in the Energy Range E$_{d,lab}$= 900-2000 keV, Suitable for NRA

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
M. Kokkoris ◽  
R. Vlastou ◽  
C. T. Papadopoulos ◽  
A. Kontos ◽  
P. Misaelides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Strong Influence ◽  
Projectile Energy ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Resonance Mechanism ◽  
Absolute Differential ◽  
Nominal Thickness ◽  
Natural Carbon

Absolute differential cross section measurements of the $^{12}C(d,p_{1,2,3})^{13}C$ reaction were performed in the projectile energy region Ed,lab = 900-2000 keV (in steps of 25 keV) and for detector angles between 145° and 170° (in steps of 5°) using as targets 99.9% purity self-supported natural carbon (98.9% 12C – 1.1% 13C) foils of nominal thickness ca. 1×10$^{18}$ at/cm2. The overall error in the absolute differential cross section measurements varied between ~8-30%. The results, presented in both graphical and tabular form, are compared with already published data and an attempt is made to explain the occurring differences. The strong influence of the resonance mechanism is presented and discussed.

Differential Cross Section Measurements for the Elastic Scattering of Protons byN14

1957 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Bolmgren ◽  
G. D. Freier ◽  
J. G. Likely ◽  
K. F. Famularo
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Differential Cross

PROTON–4He ELASTIC SCATTERING AT ~ 1 GeV

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 787-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. A. KHAN ◽  
MINITA SINGH
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Phase Variation ◽  
Glauber Model ◽  
Slight Improvement ◽  
Polarization Data ◽  
Eikonal Expansion ◽  
Rotation Function

Based on the (spin-independent) Sugar–Blanckenbecler eikonal expansion for the T-matrix, we parametrize the (spin-dependent) NN amplitude (SNN) which successfully describes the pp and pn elastic scattering observables at ~ 1 GeV up to the available momentum transfers. Using SNN, we calculate the differential cross-section, polarization, and spin-rotation function of ~ 1 GeV protons on 4 He within the framework of the Glauber model. The analysis also includes the phase variation in the NN amplitude. It is found that the use of SNN, in comparision with the usually parametrized one-term amplitude, improves the agreement with the experimental data. The introduction of a global phase variation provides only a slight improvement over the results with a constant phase. However, if we allow different phases in the central- and spin-dependent parts of the NN amplitude, the agreement with the polarization data improves further without affecting the differential cross-section results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document