scholarly journals Universal quantum uncertainty relations between nonergodicity and loss of information

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Awasthi ◽  
Samyadeb Bhattacharya ◽  
Aditi Sen(De) ◽  
Ujjwal Sen
Keyword(s):  
Uncertainty Relations ◽  
Loss Of Information ◽  
Quantum Uncertainty ◽  
Universal Quantum

scholarly journals Universal quantum uncertainty relations: Minimum-uncertainty wave packet depends on measure of spread

2019 ◽  
Vol 383 (16) ◽  
pp. 1850-1855
Author(s):  
Anindita Bera ◽  
Debmalya Das ◽  
Aditi Sen(De) ◽  
Ujjwal Sen
Keyword(s):  
Wave Packet ◽  
Uncertainty Relations ◽  
Quantum Uncertainty ◽  
Universal Quantum ◽  
Minimum Uncertainty

Quantum uncertainty relations and stochastic mechanics

1984 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. De Martino ◽  
S. De Siena
Keyword(s):  
Uncertainty Relations ◽  
Stochastic Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Uncertainty

scholarly journals Uncertainty relations: An operational approach to the error-disturbance tradeoff

Quantum ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Renes ◽  
Volkher B. Scholz ◽  
Stefan Huber
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Uncertainty Relation ◽  
Uncertainty Relations ◽  
Actual Measurement ◽  
Quantum Uncertainty ◽  
Joint Measurability ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Wave Particle Duality ◽  
Heisenberg Type ◽  
Conceptual Difficulties

The notions of error and disturbance appearing in quantum uncertainty relations are often quantified by the discrepancy of a physical quantity from its ideal value. However, these real and ideal values are not the outcomes of simultaneous measurements, and comparing the values of unmeasured observables is not necessarily meaningful according to quantum theory. To overcome these conceptual difficulties, we take a different approach and define error and disturbance in an operational manner. In particular, we formulate both in terms of the probability that one can successfully distinguish the actual measurement device from the relevant hypothetical ideal by any experimental test whatsoever. This definition itself does not rely on the formalism of quantum theory, avoiding many of the conceptual difficulties of usual definitions. We then derive new Heisenberg-type uncertainty relations for both joint measurability and the error-disturbance tradeoff for arbitrary observables of finite-dimensional systems, as well as for the case of position and momentum. Our relations may be directly applied in information processing settings, for example to infer that devices which can faithfully transmit information regarding one observable do not leak any information about conjugate observables to the environment. We also show that Englert's wave-particle duality relation [PRL 77, 2154 (1996)] can be viewed as an error-disturbance uncertainty relation.

Quantum uncertainty relations of Tsallis relative $\alpha$ entropy coherence baed on MUBs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHANG Fu Gang
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Positive Integer ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Upper And Lower Bounds ◽  
Mutually Unbiased Bases ◽  
Uncertainty Relations ◽  
Quantum Uncertainty ◽  
Single Qubit ◽  
Qubit System ◽  
Special Case

Abstract In this paper, we discuss quantum uncertainty relations of Tsallis relative $\alpha$ entropy coherence for a single qubit system based on three mutually unbiased bases. For $\alpha\in[\frac{1}{2},1)\cup(1,2]$, the upper and lower bounds of sums of coherence are obtained. However, the above results cannot be verified directly for any $\alpha\in(0,\frac{1}{2})$. Hence, we only consider the special case of $\alpha=\frac{1}{n+1}$, where $n$ is a positive integer, and we obtain the upper and lower bounds. By comparing the upper and lower bounds, we find that the upper bound is equal to the lower bound for the special $\alpha=\frac{1}{2}$, and the differences between the upper and the lower bounds will increase as $\alpha$ increases. Furthermore, we discuss the tendency of the sum of coherence, and find that it has the same tendency with respect to the different $\theta$ or $\varphi$, which is opposite to the uncertainty relations based on the R\'{e}nyi entropy and Tsallis entropy.

scholarly journals Comparing Quantum Gravity Models: String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, and Entanglement Gravity versus SU(∞)-QGR

Symmetry ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Houri Ziaeepour
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Gravity ◽  
Parameter Space ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Loop Quantum Gravity ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Gravity Models ◽  
Lorentzian Geometry ◽  
Uncertainty Relations ◽  
Special Role ◽  
Quantum Uncertainty

In a previous article we proposed a new model for quantum gravity (QGR) and cosmology, dubbed SU(∞)-QGR. One of the axioms of this model is that Hilbert spaces of the Universe and its subsystems represent the SU(∞) symmetry group. In this framework, the classical spacetime is interpreted as being the parameter space characterizing states of the SU(∞) representing Hilbert spaces. Using quantum uncertainty relations, it is shown that the parameter space—the spacetime—has a 3+1 dimensional Lorentzian geometry. Here, after a review of SU(∞)-QGR, including a demonstration that its classical limit is Einstein gravity, we compare it with several QGR proposals, including: string and M-theories, loop quantum gravity and related models, and QGR proposals inspired by the holographic principle and quantum entanglement. The purpose is to find their common and analogous features, even if they apparently seem to have different roles and interpretations. The hope is that this exercise provides a better understanding of gravity as a universal quantum force and clarifies the physical nature of the spacetime. We identify several common features among the studied models: the importance of 2D structures; the algebraic decomposition to tensor products; the special role of the SU(2) group in their formulation; the necessity of a quantum time as a relational observable. We discuss how these features can be considered as analogous in different models. We also show that they arise in SU(∞)-QGR without fine-tuning, additional assumptions, or restrictions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document