The Absorption Coefficient for Slow Electrons in Thallium Vapor

1931 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Brode
1930 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1217-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Normand

The effective cross-sectional area of an atom is defined in this paper as that area within which a passing electron is deflected so that it can no longer go through a system of slits defining a beam of electrons. The sum of all these areas in a cubic centimetre of the gas defines the absorption coefficient, the reciprocal of which is the mean free path. The absorption coefficient is a function of the atom studied and the velocity of the electron. It way also depend on the geometry of the apparatus which defines the maximum angle of deflection. From the agreement of the results obtained by several observers with different limiting angles, the variation of the observed absorption coefficient with size of the limiting angle appears to be small. The absorption coefficient is compound from the equation I = I 0 e -α xp , where I is the electron current at the end of the path, I 0 the current at the beginning of the path, x the path length, p the pressure of the gas α the absorption coefficient. Apparatus .—For the measurement of the absorption coefficient a modification of Ramsauer's original apparatus was used. The same modification was previously used for the measurement of the absorption coefficient in other gases giving results in good agreement with those by Ramsauer's more complicated apparatus.


According to the classical dynamics, the molecules in the path of a beam of electrons will, by virtue of their electric fields, deflect the electrons constituting the beam. This deflection, while not perceptible for the electrons which pass at large distances from the molecule, may cause those which approach more closely to disappear from the beam. The effective area, within which an electron will be deflected from the beam, can be calculated from the equation I = I 0 e -α xp , where I 0 is the number of electrons initially present in the beam, I the number remaining at the end of the path x , p the pressure of the gas, and α the absorption coefficient or the effective stopping area of all the molecules in a unit volume of gas at unit pressure. The mean effective area of a single molecule is obtained by dividing a by 3·56 × 10 16 , when the units chosen are millimetres of Hg and centimetres. Using this equation, Lenard and others have determined the absorption coefficients for most of the common gases.


1925 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 636-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Brode

Author(s):  
Robert E. Ogilvie

The search for an empirical absorption equation begins with the work of Siegbahn (1) in 1914. At that time Siegbahn showed that the value of (μ/ρ) for a given element could be expressed as a function of the wavelength (λ) of the x-ray photon by the following equationwhere C is a constant for a given material, which will have sudden jumps in value at critial absorption limits. Siegbahn found that n varied from 2.66 to 2.71 for various solids, and from 2.66 to 2.94 for various gases.Bragg and Pierce (2) , at this same time period, showed that their results on materials ranging from Al(13) to Au(79) could be represented by the followingwhere μa is the atomic absorption coefficient, Z the atomic number. Today equation (2) is known as the “Bragg-Pierce” Law. The exponent of 5/2(n) was questioned by many investigators, and that n should be closer to 3. The work of Wingardh (3) showed that the exponent of Z should be much lower, p = 2.95, however, this is much lower than that found by most investigators.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document