Theory of Quadratic Response Functions

1963 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1792-1797 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Price
Keyword(s):  
Response Functions ◽  
Quadratic Response

Quadratic Response Functions in a Second-Order Polarization Propagator Framework†

2005 ◽  
Vol 109 (50) ◽  
pp. 11618-11628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeppe Olsen ◽  
Poul Jørgensen ◽  
Trygve Helgaker ◽  
Jens Oddershede
Keyword(s):  
Second Order ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Polarization Propagator ◽  
Quadratic Response

ChemInform Abstract: Multiconfigurational Quadratic Response Functions for Singlet and Triplet Perturbations: The Phosphorescence Lifetime of Formaldehyde.

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (17) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
O. VAHTRAS ◽  
H. AGREN ◽  
P. JOERGENSEN ◽  
H. J. AA. JENSEN ◽  
T. HELGAKER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Functions ◽  
Phosphorescence Lifetime ◽  
Quadratic Response

scholarly journals Quadratic response functions in the relativistic four-component Kohn-Sham approximation

2008 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 024105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Henriksson ◽  
Trond Saue ◽  
Patrick Norman
Keyword(s):  
Response Functions ◽  
Quadratic Response

On quadratic response functions and triple correlations in plasmas

1969 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 486-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Silevitch ◽  
K. I. Golden
Keyword(s):  
Response Functions ◽  
Quadratic Response

Quadratic response functions for a multiconfigurational self‐consistent field wave function

1992 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 1174-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hinne Hettema ◽  
Hans Jo/rgen Aa. Jensen ◽  
Poul Jo/rgensen ◽  
Jeppe Olsen
Keyword(s):  
Wave Function ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Consistent Field ◽  
Self Consistent ◽  
Self Consistent Field ◽  
Quadratic Response ◽  
Field Wave

Response Surface Analysis of Control of Red Alder and Vine Maple with Glyphosate-Imazapyr and Triclopyr-Imazapyr

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 127-132
Author(s):  
Steven A. Knowe ◽  
Elizabeth C. Cole ◽  
Michael Newton
Keyword(s):  
Response Surface ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Alnus Rubra ◽  
Response Model ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Coast Range ◽  
Red Alder ◽  
Cascade Mountain ◽  
Quadratic Response ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Quadratic response functions were demonstrated for predicting crown reduction of red alder (Alnus rubra) and vine maple (Acer circinatum) after application of the herbicides glyphosate and triclopyr in combinations with imazapyr. Relationships between crown reduction and the application dates and rates were explored with data from five experiments previously conducted in Oregon in order to estimate optimal timing and optimal rates for each herbicide. The best crown reduction with glyphosate-imazapyr was achieved in the Cascade Mountain foothills with June or July applications and in the Coast Range with August or September applications. Control of red alder was best with 0.05 to 0.09 lb (ae/ac) imazapyr; the additive effect of glyphosate rate was more important in July than in August applications. The optimum imazapyr rates for vine maple may be outside the range of rates included in the studies, and rainfall shortly after the July application compromised the results for one study. Compared to crown reduction of vine maple with the individual herbicides, the effect with glyphosate-imazapyr varied from none to slightly positive, and that with triclopyr-imazapyr from slightly negative to additive. The response model accounted for 69-88% of the observed variation in crown reduction of vine maple. The model for red alder accounted for 44% of the variation in crown reduction. West. J. Appl. For. 10(4):127-132.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document