Quadratic Response Functions in a Second-Order Polarization Propagator Framework†

2005 ◽  
Vol 109 (50) ◽  
pp. 11618-11628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeppe Olsen ◽  
Poul Jørgensen ◽  
Trygve Helgaker ◽  
Jens Oddershede
Keyword(s):  
Second Order ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Polarization Propagator ◽  
Quadratic Response

Second-order effects in the nuclear-response functions

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. Alberico ◽  
A. de Pace ◽  
A. Drago ◽  
A. Molinari
Keyword(s):  
Second Order ◽  
Order Effects ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Second Order Effects ◽  
Nuclear Response

A Comparison of Møller-Plesset and Coupled Cluster Linear Response Theory Methods for the Calculation of Dipole Oscillator Strength Sum Rules and C6 Dispersion Coefficients

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 1415-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Paidarová ◽  
Stephan P. A. Sauer
Keyword(s):  
Oscillator Strength ◽  
Linear Response ◽  
Sum Rules ◽  
Linear Response Theory ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Response Theory ◽  
Polarization Propagator ◽  
Dipole Oscillator ◽  
Moller Plesset

Four correlated linear response theory methods - the second order polarization propagator approximation (SOPPA), the second order polarization propagator approximation with coupled cluster singles and doubles amplitudes, SOPPA(CCSD), the CC2 and coupled cluster singles doubles (CCSD) linear response theory - were used to determine the dipole oscillator strength sum rules of the hydrogen halides HX (with X = F, Cl, Br and I) and the C6 dispersion coefficient for all pairs of interacting HX molecules via numerical integration of the Casimir-Polder formula. The dependence of the polarizabilities, their frequency dependence and the C6 coefficients on the level of correlation and the dependence of the C6 coefficients on the two intramolecular bond lengths were studied.

scholarly journals Does Money Illusion Matter?: Comment

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 1047-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luba Petersen ◽  
Abel Winn
Keyword(s):  
Order Effect ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Money Illusion ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Cognitive Challenge

This paper experimentally investigates whether money illusion generates substantial nominal inertia. Building on the design of Fehr and Tyran (2001), we find no evidence that agents choose high nominal payoffs over high real payoffs. However, participants do select prices associated with high nominal payoffs within a set of maximum real payoffs as a heuristic to simplify their decision task. The cognitive challenge of this task explains the majority of the magnitude of nominal inertia; money illusion exerts only a second-order effect. The duration of nominal inertia depends primarily on participants' best response functions, not the prevalence of money illusion. (JEL C91, D21, D83, E31, E41, E52, L11)

ChemInform Abstract: Multiconfigurational Quadratic Response Functions for Singlet and Triplet Perturbations: The Phosphorescence Lifetime of Formaldehyde.

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (17) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
O. VAHTRAS ◽  
H. AGREN ◽  
P. JOERGENSEN ◽  
H. J. AA. JENSEN ◽  
T. HELGAKER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Functions ◽  
Phosphorescence Lifetime ◽  
Quadratic Response

Theory of Quadratic Response Functions

1963 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1792-1797 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Price
Keyword(s):  
Response Functions ◽  
Quadratic Response
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document