scholarly journals Functions of Gtf2i and Gtf2ird1 in the developing brain: transcription, DNA-binding, and long term behavioral consequences

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan D. Kopp ◽  
Kayla R. Nygaard ◽  
Katherine B. McCullough ◽  
Susan E. Maloney ◽  
Harrison W. Gabel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Conditioned Fear ◽  
Developing Brain ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Microdeletion Syndrome ◽  
Behavioral Phenotypes ◽  
Marble Burying ◽  
And Behavior

AbstractGtf2ird1 and Gtf2i may mediate aspects of the cognitive and behavioral phenotypes of Williams Syndrome (WS) – a microdeletion syndrome encompassing these transcription factors (TFs). Knockout mouse models of each TF show behavioral phenotypes. Here we identify their genomic binding sites in the developing brain, and test for additive effects of their mutation on transcription and behavior. Both TFs target constrained chromatin modifier and synaptic protein genes, including a significant number of ASD genes. They bind promoters, strongly overlap CTCF binding and TAD boundaries, and moderately overlap each other, suggesting epistatic effects. We used single and double mutants to test whether mutating both TFs will modify transcriptional and behavioral phenotypes of single Gtf2ird1 mutants. Despite little difference in DNA-binding and transcriptome-wide expression, Gtf2ird1 mutation caused balance, marble burying, and conditioned fear phenotypes. However, mutating Gtf2i in addition to Gtf2ird1 did not further modify transcriptomic or most behavioral phenotypes, suggesting Gtf2ird1 mutation alone is sufficient.

scholarly journals Functions of Gtf2i and Gtf2ird1 in the developing brain: transcription, DNA binding and long-term behavioral consequences

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1498-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan D Kopp ◽  
Kayla R Nygaard ◽  
Yating Liu ◽  
Katherine B McCullough ◽  
Susan E Maloney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Conditioned Fear ◽  
Protein Product ◽  
Developing Brain ◽  
Synaptic Proteins ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Behavioral Phenotypes ◽  
Chromatin Regulators ◽  
Transcription Regulators ◽  
Signal Transduction Proteins

Abstract Gtf2ird1 and Gtf2i are two transcription factors (TFs) among the 28 genes deleted in Williams syndrome, and prior mouse models of each TF show behavioral phenotypes. Here we identify their genomic binding sites in the developing brain and test for additive effects of their mutation on transcription and behavior. GTF2IRD1 binding targets were enriched for transcriptional and chromatin regulators and mediators of ubiquitination. GTF2I targets were enriched for signal transduction proteins, including regulators of phosphorylation and WNT. Both TFs are highly enriched at promoters, strongly overlap CTCF binding and topological associating domain boundaries and moderately overlap each other, suggesting epistatic effects. Shared TF targets are enriched for reactive oxygen species-responsive genes, synaptic proteins and transcription regulators such as chromatin modifiers, including a significant number of highly constrained genes and known ASD genes. We next used single and double mutants to test whether mutating both TFs will modify transcriptional and behavioral phenotypes of single Gtf2ird1 mutants, though with the caveat that our Gtf2ird1 mutants, like others previously reported, do produce low levels of a truncated protein product. Despite little difference in DNA binding and transcriptome-wide expression, homozygous Gtf2ird1 mutation caused balance, marble burying and conditioned fear phenotypes. However, mutating Gtf2i in addition to Gtf2ird1 did not further modify transcriptomic or most behavioral phenotypes, suggesting Gtf2ird1 mutation alone was sufficient for the observed phenotypes.

scholarly journals Two Pax-binding sites are required for early embryonic brain expression of an Engrailed-2 transgene

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L. Song ◽  
G. Chalepakis ◽  
P. Gruss ◽  
A.L. Joyner
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transgenic Mice ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Developing Brain ◽  
Molecular Evidence ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Pax Genes

The temporally and spatially restricted expression of the mouse Engrailed (En) genes is essential for development of the midbrain and cerebellum. The regulation of En-2 expression was studied using in vitro protein-DNA binding assays and in vivo expression analysis in transgenic mice to gain insight into the genetic events that lead to regionalization of the developing brain. A minimum En-2 1.0 kb enhancer fragment was defined and found to contain multiple positive and negative regulatory elements that function in concert to establish the early embryonic mid-hindbrain expression. Furthermore, the mid-hindbrain regulatory sequences were shown to be structurally and functionally conserved in humans. The mouse paired-box-containing genes Pax-2, Pax-5 and Pax-8 show overlapping expression with the En genes in the developing brain. Significantly, two DNA-binding sites for Pax-2, Pax-5 and Pax-8 proteins were identified in the 1.0 kb En-2 regulatory sequences, and mutation of the binding sites disrupted initiation and maintenance of expression in transgenic mice. These results present strong molecular evidence that the Pax genes are direct upstream regulators of En-2 in the genetic cascade controlling mid-hindbrain development. These mouse studies, taken together with others in Drosophila and zebrafish on the role of Pax genes in controlling expression of En family members, indicate that a Pax-En genetic pathway has been conserved during evolution.

scholarly journals Rare genetic variation at transcription factor binding sites modulates local DNA methylation profiles

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e1009189
Author(s):  
Alejandro Martin-Trujillo ◽  
Nihir Patel ◽  
Felix Richter ◽  
Bharati Jadhav ◽  
Paras Garg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Rare Genetic Variation

Although DNA methylation is the best characterized epigenetic mark, the mechanism by which it is targeted to specific regions in the genome remains unclear. Recent studies have revealed that local DNA methylation profiles might be dictated by cis-regulatory DNA sequences that mainly operate via DNA-binding factors. Consistent with this finding, we have recently shown that disruption of CTCF-binding sites by rare single nucleotide variants (SNVs) can underlie cis-linked DNA methylation changes in patients with congenital anomalies. These data raise the hypothesis that rare genetic variation at transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) might contribute to local DNA methylation patterning. In this work, by combining blood genome-wide DNA methylation profiles, whole genome sequencing-derived SNVs from 247 unrelated individuals along with 133 predicted TFBS motifs derived from ENCODE ChIP-Seq data, we observed an association between the disruption of binding sites for multiple TFs by rare SNVs and extreme DNA methylation values at both local and, to a lesser extent, distant CpGs. While the majority of these changes affected only single CpGs, 24% were associated with multiple outlier CpGs within ±1kb of the disrupted TFBS. Interestingly, disruption of functionally constrained sites within TF motifs lead to larger DNA methylation changes at nearby CpG sites. Altogether, these findings suggest that rare SNVs at TFBS negatively influence TF-DNA binding, which can lead to an altered local DNA methylation profile. Furthermore, subsequent integration of DNA methylation and RNA-Seq profiles from cardiac tissues enabled us to observe an association between rare SNV-directed DNA methylation and outlier expression of nearby genes. In conclusion, our findings not only provide insights into the effect of rare genetic variation at TFBS on shaping local DNA methylation and its consequences on genome regulation, but also provide a rationale to incorporate DNA methylation data to interpret the functional role of rare variants.

scholarly journals Characteristics of functional enrichment and gene expression level of human putative transcriptional target genes

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Osato
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Median Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Target

AbstractBackgroundTranscriptional target genes show functional enrichment of genes. However, how many and how significantly transcriptional target genes include functional enrichments are still unclear. To address these issues, I predicted human transcriptional target genes using open chromatin regions, ChIP-seq data and DNA binding sequences of transcription factors in databases, and examined functional enrichment and gene expression level of putative transcriptional target genes.ResultsGene Ontology annotations showed four times larger numbers of functional enrichments in putative transcriptional target genes than gene expression information alone, independent of transcriptional target genes. To compare the number of functional enrichments of putative transcriptional target genes between cells or search conditions, I normalized the number of functional enrichment by calculating its ratios in the total number of transcriptional target genes. With this analysis, native putative transcriptional target genes showed the largest normalized number of functional enrichments, compared with target genes including 5 – 60% of randomly selected genes. The normalized number of functional enrichments was changed according to the criteria of enhancer-promoter interactions such as distance from transcriptional start sites and orientation of CTCF-binding sites. Forward-reverse orientation of CTCF-binding sites showed significantly higher normalized number of functional enrichments than the other orientations. Journal papers showed that the top five frequent functional enrichments were related to the cellular functions in the three cell types. The median expression level of transcriptional target genes changed according to the criteria of enhancer-promoter assignments (i.e. interactions) and was correlated with the changes of the normalized number of functional enrichments of transcriptional target genes.ConclusionsHuman putative transcriptional target genes showed significant functional enrichments. Functional enrichments were related to the cellular functions. The normalized number of functional enrichments of human putative transcriptional target genes changed according to the criteria of enhancer-promoter assignments and correlated with the median expression level of the target genes. These analyses and characters of human putative transcriptional target genes would be useful to examine the criteria of enhancer-promoter assignments and to predict the novel mechanisms and factors such as DNA binding proteins and DNA sequences of enhancer-promoter interactions.

CTCF function is modulated by neighboring DNA binding factors

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 459-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Weth ◽  
Rainer Renkawitz
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Paternal Allele ◽  
Ctcf Binding Site ◽  
Enhancer Blocking

The zinc-finger protein CTCF was originally identified in the context of gene silencing and gene repression (Baniahmad et al. 1990; Lobanenkov et al. 1990). CTCF was later shown to be involved in several transcriptional mechanisms such as gene activation (Vostrov et al. 2002) and enhancer blocking (Filippova et al. 2001; Hark et al. 2000; Kanduri et al. 2000; Lutz et al. 2003; Szabó et al. 2000; Tanimoto et al. 2003; Phillips and Corces 2009; Bell et al. 1999; Zlatanova and Caiafa 2009a, 2009b). Insulators block the action of enhancers when positioned between enhancer and promoter. CTCF was found to be required in almost all cases of enhancer blocking tested in vertebrates. This CTCF-mediated enhancer blocking is in many instances conferred by constitutive CTCF action. For some examples however, a modulation of the enhancer blocking activity was documented (Lutz et al. 2003; Weth et al. 2010). One mechanism is achieved by regulation of binding to DNA. It was shown that CTCF is not able to bind to those binding-sites containing methylated CpG sequences. At the imprinting control region (ICR) of the Igf2/H19 locus the binding-site for CTCF on the paternal allele is methylated. This prevents DNA-binding of CTCF, resulting in the loss of enhancer blocking (Bell and Felsenfeld 2000; Chao et al. 2002; Filippova et al. 2001; Hark et al. 2000; Kanduri et al. 2000, 2002; Szabó et al. 2000; Takai et al. 2001). Not only can DNA methylation interfere with CTCF binding to DNA, it was also shown in one report that RNA transcription through the CTCF binding site results in CTCF eviction (Lefevre et al. 2008). In contrast to these cases most of the DNA sites are not differentially bound by CTCF. Even CTCF interaction with its cofactor cohesin does not seem to differ in different cell types (Schmidt et al. 2010). These results indicate that regulation of CTCF activity might be achieved by neighboring factors bound to DNA. In fact, whole genome analyses of CTCF binding sites identified several classes of neighboring sequences (Dickson et al. 2010; Boyle et al. 2010; Essien et al. 2009). Therefore, in this review we will summarize those results for which a combined action of CTCF with factors bound adjacently was found. These neighboring factors include the RNA polymerases I, II and III, another zinc finger factor VEZF1 and the factors YY1, SMAD, TR and Oct4. Each of these seems to influence, modulate or determine the function of CTCF. Thereby, at least some of the pleiotropic effects of CTCF can be explained.

scholarly journals CTCF mediates chromatin looping via N-terminal domain-dependent cohesin retention

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 2020-2031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena M. Pugacheva ◽  
Naoki Kubo ◽  
Dmitri Loukinov ◽  
Md Tajmul ◽  
Sungyun Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Complex Function ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Dna Binding Sites ◽  
3D Geometry ◽  
N Terminus

The DNA-binding protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) and the cohesin complex function together to shape chromatin architecture in mammalian cells, but the molecular details of this process remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that a 79-aa region within the CTCF N terminus is essential for cohesin positioning at CTCF binding sites and chromatin loop formation. However, the N terminus of CTCF fused to artificial zinc fingers was not sufficient to redirect cohesin to non-CTCF binding sites, indicating a lack of an autonomously functioning domain in CTCF responsible for cohesin positioning. BORIS (CTCFL), a germline-specific paralog of CTCF, was unable to anchor cohesin to CTCF DNA binding sites. Furthermore, CTCF–BORIS chimeric constructs provided evidence that, besides the N terminus of CTCF, the first two CTCF zinc fingers, and likely the 3D geometry of CTCF–DNA complexes, are also involved in cohesin retention. Based on this knowledge, we were able to convert BORIS into CTCF with respect to cohesin positioning, thus providing additional molecular details of the ability of CTCF to retain cohesin. Taken together, our data provide insight into the process by which DNA-bound CTCF constrains cohesin movement to shape spatiotemporal genome organization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document