scholarly journals Differential expression of five prosomatostatin genes in the central nervous system of the catshark Scyliorhinus canicula

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Sobrido-Cameán ◽  
Herve Tostivint ◽  
Sylvie Mazan ◽  
María Celina Rodicio ◽  
Isabel Rodríguez-Moldes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Hydroxylase ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Central Canal ◽  
Scyliorhinus Canicula ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Reticular Neurons ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
The Brain

ABSTRACTFive prosomatostatin genes (PSST1, PSST2, PSST3, PSST5 and PSST6) have been recently identified in elasmobranchs (Tostivint, Gaillard, Mazan, & Pézeron, 2019). In order to gain insight into the contribution of each somatostatin to specific nervous systems circuits and behaviors in this important jawed vertebrate group, we studied the distribution of neurons expressing PSST mRNAs in the catshark Scyliorhinus canicula using in situ hybridization with specific probes for the five PSSTs transcripts. Additionally, we combined in situ hybridization with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunochemistry for better localization of some PSSTs-positive populations. The five PSST genes showed expression in the brain, although with important differences in distribution. PSST1 and PSST6 were widely expressed in different brain regions. Instead, PSST2 and PSST3 were expressed only in the ventral hypothalamus and in some hindbrain lateral reticular neurons, whereas PSST5 was only expressed in the region of the entopeduncular nucleus. PSST1 and PSST6 were expressed by numerous pallial neurons, although in different populations judging from the colocalization of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunoreactivity and PSST6 expression in pallial neurons and the absence of colocalization between TH and PSST1 expression. Differential expression of PSST1 and PSST6 was also observed in the subpallium, hypothalamus, diencephalon, optic tectum, midbrain tegmentum and rhombencephalon. Expression of PSST1 was observed in numerous cerebrospinal fluid-contacting (CSF-c) neurons of the paraventricular organ of the hypothalamus and the central canal of the spinal cord. These wide differences in expression of PSST genes together with the numerous brain nuclei expressing PSSTs, indicate that catshark somatostatinergic neurons are implicated differentially in a number of neural circuits.

Mouse Wnt genes exhibit discrete domains of expression in the early embryonic CNS and limb buds

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 247-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.A. Parr ◽  
M.J. Shea ◽  
G. Vassileva ◽  
A.P. McMahon
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Expression Studies ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Discrete Domains ◽  
Early Developmental ◽  
The Brain

Mutation and expression studies have implicated the Wnt gene family in early developmental decision making in vertebrates and flies. In a detailed comparative analysis, we have used in situ hybridization of 8.0- to 9.5-day mouse embryos to characterize expression of all ten published Wnt genes in the central nervous system (CNS) and limb buds. Seven of the family members show restricted expression patterns in the brain. At least three genes (Wnt-3, Wnt-3a, and Wnt-7b) exhibit sharp boundaries of expression in the forebrain that may predict subdivisions of the region later in development. In the spinal cord, Wnt-1, Wnt-3, and Wnt-3a are expressed dorsally, Wnt-5a, Wnt-7a, and Wnt-7b more ventrally, and Wnt-4 both dorsally and in the floor plate. In the forelimb primordia, Wnt-3, Wnt-4, Wnt-6 and Wnt-7b are expressed fairly uniformly throughout the limb ectoderm. Wnt-5a RNA is distributed in a proximal to distal gradient through the limb mesenchyme and ectoderm. Along the limb's dorsal-ventral axis, Wnt-5a is expressed in the ventral ectoderm and Wnt-7a in the dorsal ectoderm. We discuss the significance of these patterns of restricted and partially overlapping domains of expression with respect to the putative function of Wnt signalling in early CNS and limb development.

scholarly journals Neurohypophysial Hormones Associated with Osmotic Challenges in the Brain and Pituitary of the Euryhaline Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 3086
Author(s):  
Adimoolam Aruna ◽  
Chien-Ju Lin ◽  
Ganesan Nagarajan ◽  
Ching-Fong Chang
Keyword(s):  
Osmotic Stress ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Arginine Vasotocin ◽  
Acanthopagrus Schlegelii ◽  
Neurohypophysial Hormones ◽  
Black Porgy ◽  
Pituitary Glands ◽  
The Brain

Our study showed differential expression of the arginine vasotocin (avt)/isotocin (it) in the brain and pituitary gland of the euryhaline black porgy (Acanthopagrus schlegelii) during osmotic stress. A decrease in serum osmolality and increased cortisol levels were observed after acute transfer from seawater (SW) to freshwater (FW). The increased expressions of avt, avt receptor (avtr: v1a), and isotocin receptor (itr: itr1) transcripts on day 1 and it and itr transcripts on days 7 and 30 were found in the brains and pituitary glands of FW fish. Increased levels of avt mRNA in the diencephalon and avtr mRNA in the pituitary together with serum cortisol on day 1 of FW exposure indicated activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–interrenal (HPI) axis. The expression levels of avtr and itr after FW transfer were increased in the pituitary on days 7 and 30. Furthermore, in situ hybridization demonstrated spatially differential expression of avt and itr transcripts in nucleus preopticus parvocellularis of pars gigantocellularis (PMgc), magnocellularis (PMmc), and parvocellularis (PMpc) of the preoptic area (POA). Positive signals for avt and it were highly abundant in PMpc after FW exposure. The data suggest involvement of neurohypophysial hormones in the brain (telencephalon and diencephalon) and pituitary for osmotic stress.

Localization of tyrosine hydroxylase and its messenger RNA in the brain of rainbow trout by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization

2002 ◽  
Vol 449 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelique Vetillard ◽  
Sanae Benanni ◽  
Christian Saligaut ◽  
Patrick Jego ◽  
Thierry Bailhache
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Rainbow Trout ◽  
Tyrosine Hydroxylase ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
The Brain

scholarly journals Neuronal MCP-1 Expression in Response to Remote Nerve Injury

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Flügel ◽  
Gerhard Hager ◽  
Andrea Horvat ◽  
Christoph Spitzer ◽  
Gamal M. A. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Inflammatory Responses ◽  
Nerve Lesion ◽  
Monocyte Chemoattractant ◽  
Direct Injury ◽  
Inflammatory Activation ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Inducible Protein ◽  
The Brain

Direct injury of the brain is followed by inflammatory responses regulated by cytokines and chemoattractants secreted from resident glia and invading cells of the peripheral immune system. In contrast, after remote lesion of the central nervous system, exemplified here by peripheral transection or crush of the facial and hypoglossal nerve, the locally observed inflammatory activation is most likely triggered by the damaged cells themselves, that is, the injured neurons. The authors investigated the expression of the chemoattractants monocyte chemoattractant protein MCP-1, regulation on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), and interferon-gamma inducible protein IP10 after peripheral nerve lesion of the facial and hypoglossal nuclei. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry revealed an induction of neuronal MCP-1 expression within 6 hours postoperation, reaching a peak at 3 days and remaining up-regulated for up to 6 weeks. MCP-1 expression was almost exclusively confined to neurons but was also present on a few scattered glial cells. The authors found no alterations in the level of expression and cellular distribution of RANTES or IP10, which were both confined to neurons. Protein expression of the MCP-1 receptor CCR2 did not change. MCP-1, expressed by astrocytes and activated microglia, has been shown to be crucial for monocytic, or T-cell chemoattraction, or both. Accordingly, expression of MCP-1 by neurons and its corresponding receptor in microglia suggests that this chemokine is involved in neuron and microglia interaction.

scholarly journals Expression and distribution of synaptotagmin isoforms in the zebrafish retina

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Henry ◽  
Christina Joselevitch ◽  
Gary G. Matthews ◽  
Lonnie P. Wollmuth
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Large Family ◽  
Amino Acid Residues ◽  
Ribbon Synapses ◽  
The Family ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Asynchronous Release ◽  
The Brain

ABSTRACTSynaptotagmins belong to a large family of proteins. While various synaptotagmins have been implicated as Ca2+ sensors for vesicle replenishment and release at conventional synapses, their roles at retinal ribbon synapses remain incompletely understood. Zebrafish is a widely used experimental model for retinal research. We therefore investigated the homology between human, rat, mouse, and zebrafish synaptotagmins 1 to 10 using a bioinformatics approach. We also characterized the expression and distribution of various synaptotagmin (syt) genes in the zebrafish retina using RT-PCR and in situ hybridization, focusing on the family members whose products likely underlie Ca2+-dependent exocytosis in the central nervous system (synaptotagmins 1, 2, 5 and 7). We find that most zebrafish synaptotagmins are well conserved and can be grouped in the same classes as mammalian synaptotagmins, based on crucial amino acid residues needed for coordinating Ca2+ binding and determining phospholipid binding affinity. The only exception is synaptotagmin 1b, which lacks 34 amino acid residues in the C2B domain and is therefore unlikely to bind Ca2+ there. Additionally, the products of zebrafish syt5a and syt5b genes share identity with mammalian class 1 and 5 synaptotagmins. Zebrafish syt1, syt2, syt5 and syt7 paralogues are found in the zebrafish brain, eye, and retina, excepting syt1b, which is only present in the brain. The complementary expression pattern of the remaining paralogues in the retina suggests that syt1a and syt5a may underlie synchronous release and syt7a and syt7b may mediate asynchronous release or other Ca2+ dependent processes in different types of retinal neurons.

scholarly journals Effects of tiletamine-xylazine-tramadol combination and its specific antagonist on AMPK in the brain of rats

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-292
Author(s):  
Ning Ma ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Hong-bin Wang ◽  
Li Gao ◽  
Jian-hua Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Opposite Effect ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sprague Dawley ◽  
Sd Rats ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Specific Antagonist ◽  
Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
The Brain

AbstractIntroduction:Tiletamine-xylazine-tramadol (XFM) has few side effects and can provide good sedation and analgesia. Adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) can attenuate trigeminal neuralgia. The study aimed to investigate the effects of XFM and its specific antagonist on AMPK in different regions of the brain.Material and Methods:A model of XFM in the rat was established. A total of 72 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into three equally sized groups: XFM anaesthesia (M group), antagonist (W group), and XFM with antagonist interactive groups (MW group). Eighteen SD rats were in the control group and were injected intraperitoneally with saline (C group). The rats were sacrificed and the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, thalamus, and brain stem were immediately separated, in order to detect AMPKα mRNA expression by quantitative PCR.Results:XFM was able to increase the mRNA expression of AMPKα1 and AMPKα2 in all brain regions, and the antagonist caused the opposite effect, although the effects of XFM could not be completely reversed in some areas.Conclusion:XFM can influence the expression of AMPK in the central nervous system of the rat, which can provide a reference for the future development of anaesthetics for animals.

scholarly journals Astrocytes, Noradrenaline, α1-Adrenoreceptors, and Neuromodulation: Evidence and Unanswered Questions

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Wahis ◽  
Matthew G. Holt
Keyword(s):  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Synaptic Activity ◽  
Physiological Effects ◽  
Astrocyte Heterogeneity ◽  
Main Effect ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Noradrenergic Modulation ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Experimental Strategies

Noradrenaline is a major neuromodulator in the central nervous system (CNS). It is released from varicosities on neuronal efferents, which originate principally from the main noradrenergic nuclei of the brain – the locus coeruleus – and spread throughout the parenchyma. Noradrenaline is released in response to various stimuli and has complex physiological effects, in large part due to the wide diversity of noradrenergic receptors expressed in the brain, which trigger diverse signaling pathways. In general, however, its main effect on CNS function appears to be to increase arousal state. Although the effects of noradrenaline have been researched extensively, the majority of studies have assumed that noradrenaline exerts its effects by acting directly on neurons. However, neurons are not the only cells in the CNS expressing noradrenaline receptors. Astrocytes are responsive to a range of neuromodulators – including noradrenaline. In fact, noradrenaline evokes robust calcium transients in astrocytes across brain regions, through activation of α1-adrenoreceptors. Crucially, astrocytes ensheath neurons at synapses and are known to modulate synaptic activity. Hence, astrocytes are in a key position to relay, or amplify, the effects of noradrenaline on neurons, most notably by modulating inhibitory transmission. Based on a critical appraisal of the current literature, we use this review to argue that a better understanding of astrocyte-mediated noradrenaline signaling is therefore essential, if we are ever to fully understand CNS function. We discuss the emerging concept of astrocyte heterogeneity and speculate on how this might impact the noradrenergic modulation of neuronal circuits. Finally, we outline possible experimental strategies to clearly delineate the role(s) of astrocytes in noradrenergic signaling, and neuromodulation in general, highlighting the urgent need for more specific and flexible experimental tools.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document