scholarly journals Sex classification using long-range temporal dependence of resting-state functional MRI time series

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvisha Dhamala ◽  
Keith W. Jamison ◽  
Mert R. Sabuncu ◽  
Amy Kuceyeski

AbstractA thorough understanding of sex differences, if any, that exist in the brains of healthy individuals is crucial for the study of neurological illnesses that exhibit differences in clinical and behavioural phenotypes between males and females. In this work, we evaluate sex differences in regional temporal dependence of resting-state brain activity using 195 male-female pairs (aged 22-37) from the Human Connectome Project. Male-female pairs are strictly matched for total grey matter volume. We find that males have more persistent long-range temporal dependence than females in regions within temporal, parietal, and occipital cortices. Machine learning algorithms trained on regional temporal dependence measures achieve sex classification accuracies of up to 81%. Regions with the strongest feature importance in the sex classification task included cerebellum, amygdala, frontal cortex, and occipital cortex. Additionally, we find that even after males and females are strictly matched on total grey matter volume, significant regional volumetric sex differences persist in many cortical and subcortical regions. Our results indicate males have larger cerebella, hippocampi, parahippocampi, thalami, caudates, and amygdalae while females have larger cingulates, precunei, frontal cortices, and parietal cortices. Sex classification based on regional volume achieves accuracies of up to 85%; cerebellum, cingulate cortex, and temporal cortex are the most important features. These findings highlight the important role of strict volume matching when studying brain-based sex differences. Differential patterns in regional temporal dependence between males and females identifies a potential neurobiological substrate underlying sex differences in functional brain activation patterns and the behaviours with which they correlate.

NeuroImage ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 1205-1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Veronica Witte ◽  
Markus Savli ◽  
Alexander Holik ◽  
Siegfried Kasper ◽  
Rupert Lanzenberger

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Sanchis-Segura ◽  
Maria Victoria Ibañez-Gual ◽  
Naiara Aguirre ◽  
Álvaro Javier Cruz-Gómez ◽  
Cristina Forn

Abstract Sex differences in 116 local gray matter volumes (GMVOL) were assessed in 444 males and 444 females without correcting for total intracranial volume (TIV) or after adjusting the data with the scaling, proportions, power-corrected proportions (PCP), and residuals methods. The results confirmed that only the residuals and PCP methods completely eliminate TIV-variation and result in sex-differences that are “small” (∣d∣ < 0.3). Moreover, as assessed using a totally independent sample, sex differences in PCP and residuals adjusted-data showed higher replicability ($$\approx $$ ≈ 93%) than scaling and proportions adjusted-data $$( \approx $$ ( ≈ 68%) or raw data ($$\approx $$ ≈ 45%). The replicated effects were meta-analyzed together and confirmed that, when TIV-variation is adequately controlled, volumetric sex differences become “small” (∣d∣ < 0.3 in all cases). Finally, we assessed the utility of TIV-corrected/ TIV-uncorrected GMVOL features in predicting individuals’ sex with 12 different machine learning classifiers. Sex could be reliably predicted (> 80%) when using raw local GMVOL, but also when using scaling or proportions adjusted-data or TIV as a single predictor. Conversely, after properly controlling TIV variation with the PCP and residuals’ methods, prediction accuracy dropped to $$\approx $$ ≈ 60%. It is concluded that gross morphological differences account for most of the univariate and multivariate sex differences in GMVOL


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Chen ◽  
Zhi Li ◽  
Ji-fang Cui ◽  
Jia Huang ◽  
Muireann Irish ◽  
...  

Abstract Sex differences in behaviour and cognition have been widely observed, however, little is known about such differences in maintaining a balanced time perspective or their potential underlying neural substrates. To answer the above questions, two studies were conducted. In Study 1, time perspective was assessed in 1,913 college students, including 771 males and 1,092 females, and demonstrated that females had a significantly more balanced time perspective than males. In Study 2, 58 males and 47 females underwent assessment of time perspective and structural brain imaging. Voxel-based morphometry analysis and cortical thickness analysis were used to analyse the structural imaging data. Results showed that compared with males, females demonstrated a more balanced time perspective, which primarily related to lower grey matter volume in left precuneus, right cerebellum, right putamen and left supplementary motor area. Analysis of cortical thickness failed to reveal any significant sex differences. Furthermore, the sex difference in grey matter volume of left precuneus, right cerebellum, right putamen and left supplementary motor area could account for the difference in balanced time perspective between males and females. The findings deepen our understanding of sex differences in human cognition and their potential neural signature, and may inform tailored interventions to support a balanced time perspective in daily life.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie R.J. Nagy ◽  
Christienne G. Damatac ◽  
Mark G. Baxter ◽  
Peter H. Rudebeck ◽  
Paula L. Croxson

AbstractHere we assessed whether higher cognitive function differed between male and female rhesus monkeys using tests of episodic memory and strategy implementation. We did not find any difference between males and females on behavioral performance or on analyses of grey matter volume of key regions. Our findings suggest that, at least where higher cognitive function in healthy monkeys is concerned, the sexes may not differ.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Sanchis-Segura ◽  
Maria Victoria Ibañez-Gual ◽  
Naiara Aguirre ◽  
Álvaro Javier Cruz-Gómez ◽  
Cristina Forn

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Rando ◽  
Keri Tuit ◽  
Jonas Hannestad ◽  
Joseph Guarnaccia ◽  
Rajita Sinha

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R. McGregor ◽  
Paul L. Gribble

AbstractAction observation can facilitate the acquisition of novel motor skills, however, there is considerable individual variability in the extent to which observation promotes motor learning. Here we tested the hypothesis that individual differences in brain function or structure can predict subsequent observation-related gains in motor learning. Subjects underwent an anatomical MRI scan and resting-state fMRI scans to assess pre-observation grey matter volume and pre-observation resting-state functional connectivity (FC), respectively. On the following day, subjects observed a video of a tutor adapting her reaches to a novel force field. After observation, subjects performed reaches in a force field as a behavioral assessment of gains in motor learning resulting from observation. We found that individual differences in resting-state FC, but not grey matter volume, predicted post-observation gains in motor learning. Pre-observation resting-state FC between left S1 and bilateral PMd, M1, S1 and left SPL was positively correlated with behavioral measures of post-observation motor learning. Sensory-motor resting-state FC can thus predict the extent to which observation will promote subsequent motor learning.New & NoteworthyWe show that individual differences in pre-observation brain function can predict subsequent observation-related gains in motor learning. Pre-observation resting-state functional connectivity within a sensory-motor network may be used as a biomarker for the extent to which observation promotes motor learning. This kind of information may be useful if observation is to be used as a way to boost neuroplasticity and sensory motor recovery for patients undergoing rehabilitation for diseases that impair movement such as stroke.


2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A44-A44
Author(s):  
C. Sanchez-Castaneda ◽  
F. de Pasquale ◽  
C. Caravasso ◽  
U. Sabatini ◽  
F. Squitieri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document