scholarly journals Functional Connectivity Between Somatosensory and Motor Brain Areas Predicts Individual Differences in Motor Learning by Observing

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R. McGregor ◽  
Paul L. Gribble

AbstractAction observation can facilitate the acquisition of novel motor skills, however, there is considerable individual variability in the extent to which observation promotes motor learning. Here we tested the hypothesis that individual differences in brain function or structure can predict subsequent observation-related gains in motor learning. Subjects underwent an anatomical MRI scan and resting-state fMRI scans to assess pre-observation grey matter volume and pre-observation resting-state functional connectivity (FC), respectively. On the following day, subjects observed a video of a tutor adapting her reaches to a novel force field. After observation, subjects performed reaches in a force field as a behavioral assessment of gains in motor learning resulting from observation. We found that individual differences in resting-state FC, but not grey matter volume, predicted post-observation gains in motor learning. Pre-observation resting-state FC between left S1 and bilateral PMd, M1, S1 and left SPL was positively correlated with behavioral measures of post-observation motor learning. Sensory-motor resting-state FC can thus predict the extent to which observation will promote subsequent motor learning.New & NoteworthyWe show that individual differences in pre-observation brain function can predict subsequent observation-related gains in motor learning. Pre-observation resting-state functional connectivity within a sensory-motor network may be used as a biomarker for the extent to which observation promotes motor learning. This kind of information may be useful if observation is to be used as a way to boost neuroplasticity and sensory motor recovery for patients undergoing rehabilitation for diseases that impair movement such as stroke.

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 1235-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R. McGregor ◽  
Paul L. Gribble

We show that individual differences in preobservation brain function can predict subsequent observation-related gains in motor learning. Preobservation resting-state functional connectivity within a sensory-motor network may be used as a biomarker for the extent to which observation promotes motor learning. This kind of information may be useful if observation is to be used as a way to boost neuroplasticity and sensory-motor recovery for patients undergoing rehabilitation for diseases that impair movement such as stroke.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ATP Jäger ◽  
JM Huntenburg ◽  
SA Tremblay ◽  
U Schneider ◽  
S Grahl ◽  
...  

AbstractIn motor learning, sequence-specificity, i.e. the learning of specific sequential associations, has predominantly been studied using task-based fMRI paradigms. However, offline changes in resting state functional connectivity after sequence-specific motor learning are less well understood. Previous research has established that plastic changes following motor learning can be divided into stages including fast learning, slow learning and retention. A description of how resting state functional connectivity after sequence-specific motor sequence learning (MSL) develops across these stages is missing. This study aimed to identify plastic alterations in whole-brain functional connectivity after learning a complex motor sequence by contrasting an active group who learned a complex sequence with a control group who performed a control task matched for motor execution. Resting state fMRI and behavioural performance were collected in both groups over the course of 5 consecutive training days and at follow-up after 12 days to encompass fast learning, slow learning, overall learning and retention. Between-group interaction analyses showed sequence-specific increases in functional connectivity during fast learning in the sensorimotor territory of the internal segment of right globus pallidus (GPi), and sequence-specific decreases in right supplementary motor area (SMA) in overall learning. We found that connectivity changes in key regions of the motor network including the superior parietal cortex (SPC) and primary motor cortex (M1) were not a result of sequence-specific learning but were instead linked to motor execution. Our study confirms the sequence-specific role of SMA and GPi that has previously been identified in online task-based learning studies in humans and primates, and extends it to resting state network changes after sequence-specific MSL. Finally, our results shed light on a timing-specific plasticity mechanism between GPi and SMA following MSL.


2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1308-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor M. Saenger ◽  
Fernando A. Barrios ◽  
María L. Martínez-Gudiño ◽  
Sarael Alcauter

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (13) ◽  
pp. 2918-2929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisha L. Janssen ◽  
Aaron Boster ◽  
Beth A. Patterson ◽  
Amir Abduljalil ◽  
Ruchika Shaurya Prakash

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvisha Dhamala ◽  
Keith W. Jamison ◽  
Mert R. Sabuncu ◽  
Amy Kuceyeski

AbstractA thorough understanding of sex differences, if any, that exist in the brains of healthy individuals is crucial for the study of neurological illnesses that exhibit differences in clinical and behavioural phenotypes between males and females. In this work, we evaluate sex differences in regional temporal dependence of resting-state brain activity using 195 male-female pairs (aged 22-37) from the Human Connectome Project. Male-female pairs are strictly matched for total grey matter volume. We find that males have more persistent long-range temporal dependence than females in regions within temporal, parietal, and occipital cortices. Machine learning algorithms trained on regional temporal dependence measures achieve sex classification accuracies of up to 81%. Regions with the strongest feature importance in the sex classification task included cerebellum, amygdala, frontal cortex, and occipital cortex. Additionally, we find that even after males and females are strictly matched on total grey matter volume, significant regional volumetric sex differences persist in many cortical and subcortical regions. Our results indicate males have larger cerebella, hippocampi, parahippocampi, thalami, caudates, and amygdalae while females have larger cingulates, precunei, frontal cortices, and parietal cortices. Sex classification based on regional volume achieves accuracies of up to 85%; cerebellum, cingulate cortex, and temporal cortex are the most important features. These findings highlight the important role of strict volume matching when studying brain-based sex differences. Differential patterns in regional temporal dependence between males and females identifies a potential neurobiological substrate underlying sex differences in functional brain activation patterns and the behaviours with which they correlate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document