scholarly journals Leader cells in collective chemotaxis: optimality and tradeoffs

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Hopkins ◽  
Brian A. Camley

Clusters of cells can work together in order to follow a signal gradient, chemotaxing even when single cells do not. Cells in different regions of collectively migrating neural crest streams show different gene expression profiles, suggesting that cells may specialize to leader and follower roles. We use a minimal mathematical model to understand when this specialization is advantageous. In our model, leader cells sense the gradient with an accuracy that depends on the kinetics of ligand-receptor binding while follower cells follow the cluster’s direction with a finite error. Intuitively, specialization into leaders and followers should be optimal when a few cells have more information than the rest of the cluster, such as in the presence of a sharp transition in chemoattractant concentration. We do find this – but also find that high levels of specialization can be optimal in the opposite limit of very shallow gradients. We also predict that the best location for leaders may not be at the front of the cluster. In following leaders, clusters may have to choose between speed and flexibility. Clusters with only a few leaders can take orders of magnitude more time to reorient than all-leader clusters.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A12.1-A12
Author(s):  
Y Arjmand Abbassi ◽  
N Fang ◽  
W Zhu ◽  
Y Zhou ◽  
Y Chen ◽  
...  

Recent advances of high-throughput single cell sequencing technologies have greatly improved our understanding of the complex biological systems. Heterogeneous samples such as tumor tissues commonly harbor cancer cell-specific genetic variants and gene expression profiles, both of which have been shown to be related to the mechanisms of disease development, progression, and responses to treatment. Furthermore, stromal and immune cells within tumor microenvironment interact with cancer cells to play important roles in tumor responses to systematic therapy such as immunotherapy or cell therapy. However, most current high-throughput single cell sequencing methods detect only gene expression levels or epigenetics events such as chromatin conformation. The information on important genetic variants including mutation or fusion is not captured. To better understand the mechanisms of tumor responses to systematic therapy, it is essential to decipher the connection between genotype and gene expression patterns of both tumor cells and cells in the tumor microenvironment. We developed FocuSCOPE, a high-throughput multi-omics sequencing solution that can detect both genetic variants and transcriptome from same single cells. FocuSCOPE has been used to successfully perform single cell analysis of both gene expression profiles and point mutations, fusion genes, or intracellular viral sequences from thousands of cells simultaneously, delivering comprehensive insights of tumor and immune cells in tumor microenvironment at single cell resolution.Disclosure InformationY. Arjmand Abbassi: None. N. Fang: None. W. Zhu: None. Y. Zhou: None. Y. Chen: None. U. Deutsch: None.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnav Moudgil ◽  
Michael N. Wilkinson ◽  
Xuhua Chen ◽  
June He ◽  
Alex J. Cammack ◽  
...  

AbstractIn situ measurements of transcription factor (TF) binding are confounded by cellular heterogeneity and represent averaged profiles in complex tissues. Single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is capable of resolving different cell types based on gene expression profiles, but no technology exists to directly link specific cell types to the binding pattern of TFs in those cell types. Here, we present self-reporting transposons (SRTs) and their use in single cell calling cards (scCC), a novel assay for simultaneously capturing gene expression profiles and mapping TF binding sites in single cells. First, we show how the genomic locations of SRTs can be recovered from mRNA. Next, we demonstrate that SRTs deposited by the piggyBac transposase can be used to map the genome-wide localization of the TFs SP1, through a direct fusion of the two proteins, and BRD4, through its native affinity for piggyBac. We then present the scCC method, which maps SRTs from scRNA-seq libraries, thus enabling concomitant identification of cell types and TF binding sites in those same cells. As a proof-of-concept, we show recovery of cell type-specific BRD4 and SP1 binding sites from cultured cells. Finally, we map Brd4 binding sites in the mouse cortex at single cell resolution, thus establishing a new technique for studying TF biology in situ.


Cell ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 181 (7) ◽  
pp. 1693-1694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Bowling ◽  
Duluxan Sritharan ◽  
Fernando G. Osorio ◽  
Maximilian Nguyen ◽  
Priscilla Cheung ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2690-2698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Francesconi ◽  
Ben Lehner

Gene expression profiling is a fast, cheap and standardised analysis that provides a high dimensional measurement of the state of a biological sample, including of single cells. Computational methods to reconstruct the composition of samples and spatial and temporal information from expression profiles are described, as well as how they can be used to describe the effects of genetic variation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Hee Mok ◽  
James N. MacLeod

Within developing synovial joints, interzone and anlagen cells progress through divergent chondrogenic pathways to generate stable articular cartilage and transient hypertrophic anlagen cartilage, respectively. Understanding the comparative cell biology between interzone and anlagen cells may provide novel insights into emergent cell-based therapies to support articular cartilage regeneration. The aim of this study was to assess the kinetics of gene expression profiles in these skeletal cell lines after inducing chondrogenesis in culture. Interzone and anlagen cells from seven equine fetuses were isolated and grown in a TGF-β1 chondrogenic inductive medium. Total RNA was isolated at ten time points (0, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 168, and 336 h), and gene expression for 93 targeted gene loci was measured in a microfluidic RT-qPCR system. Differential transcriptional responses were observed as early as 1.5 h after the initiation of chondrogenesis. Genes with functional annotations that include transcription regulation responded to the chondrogenic stimulation earlier (1.5–96 h) than genes involved in signal transduction (1.5–336 h) and the extracellular matrix biology (3–336 h). Between interzone and anlagen cell cultures, expression levels of 73 out of the 93 targeted genes were not initially different at 0 h, but 47 out of the 73 genes became differentially expressed under the chondrogenic stimulation. While interzone and anlagen cells are both chondrogenic, they display clear differences in response to the same TGF-β1 chondrogenic stimulation. This study provides new molecular insight into a timed sequence of the divergent developmental fates of interzone and anlagen cells in culture over 14 days.


Cell ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 181 (6) ◽  
pp. 1410-1422.e27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Bowling ◽  
Duluxan Sritharan ◽  
Fernando G. Osorio ◽  
Maximilian Nguyen ◽  
Priscilla Cheung ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Cao ◽  
Junjie Zhu ◽  
Peilin Jia ◽  
Zhongming Zhao

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayano Odashima ◽  
Shoko Onodera ◽  
Akiko Saito ◽  
Takashi Nakamura ◽  
Yuuki Ogihara ◽  
...  

AbstractCranial neural crest cells (cNCCs) comprise a multipotent population of cells that migrate into the pharyngeal arches of the vertebrate embryo and differentiate into a broad range of derivatives of the craniofacial organs. Consequently, migrating cNCCs are considered as one of the most attractive candidate sources of cells for regenerative medicine. In this study, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of cNCCs at different time points after induction by conducting three independent RNA sequencing experiments. We successfully induced cNCC formation from mouse induced pluripotent stem (miPS) cells by culturing them in neural crest inducing media for 14 days. We found that these cNCCs expressed several neural crest specifier genes but were lacking some previously reported specifiers, such as paired box 3 (Pax3), msh homeobox 1 (Msx1), and Forkhead box D3 (FoxD3), which are presumed to be essential for neural crest development in the embryo. Thus, a distinct molecular network may the control gene expression in miPS-derived cNCCs. We also found that c-Myc, ETS proto-oncogene 1, transcription factor (Ets1), and sex determining region Y-box 10 (Sox10) were only detected at 14 days after induction. Therefore, we assume that these genes would be useful markers for migratory cNCCs induced from miPS cells. Eventually, these cNCCs comprised a broad spectrum of protocadherin (Pcdh) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (Adamts) family proteins, which may be crucial in their migration.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1231-1231
Author(s):  
Chih Long Liu ◽  
Bo Dai ◽  
Aaron M. Newman ◽  
Ravi Majeti ◽  
Ash A Alizadeh

Abstract Abstract 1231 Background: Current methods for defining and isolating human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using surface markers enrich for unique functional properties of these populations. However, significant functional heterogeneity in these compartments remains with important implications for understanding normal and altered hematopoiesis. Using flow sorting to enrich >10,000 cells as progenitor subpopulations, we previously characterized the gene expression signature of normal human HSC (Majetiet al 2009 PNAS 106(9):3396–3401). We hypothesized that interrogation of the transcriptomes of single cells from this compartment could resolve remaining heterogeneity and help identify and better define features of progenitor cells and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Methods: Using normal human bone marrow aspirates and a FACS Aria II instrument equipped with a specialized single-cell sorting apparatus, we sorted cells enriched for HSCs based on expression of Lin-CD34+CD38-CD90+CD45RA− into 1-cell, 10-cell, 100-cell, and 40000-cell (bulk) representations. We used at least 5 replicates per group and verified single cell deposition by direct visualization. We amplified cDNA from these corresponding inputs using an exponential whole transcriptome amplification (WTA) scheme (Miltenyi SuperAmp), and evaluated gene expression profiles by two microarray platforms (Agilent/GE Healthcare 60K, and Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0), and by RNA-Seq (Illumina). We used gene expression correlation between replicates within and between microarrays as means of assessing methodological reproducibility and estimating population heterogeneity. Results: Whole transcriptome amplification yielded cDNA ranging from 0.2–1 kb for 10 and 100 cells, with significantly lower size distribution of amplified cDNA observed for single cells. Gene expression profiles had significantly better replicate reproducibility and array coverage with the Agilent microarray platform when compared with the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 platform (gene coverage of 84 % for 100 cells, 73 % for 10 cells and 50% for 1 cell for Agilent vs 24 % for 100 cells, 11 % for 10 cells and 5.7% for 1 cell for Affymetrix). RNA-Seq profiling of the same populations is ongoing with major technical optimizations focused on reducing amplification of non-human templates while maintaining library complexity and representation. Using biological replicates for each input size, we observed high inter-replicate correlation levels for expression profiles obtained for bulk sorted HSCs from 8 healthy donors (∼40000-cells, average r=0.97) and for 100-cell and 10-cell inputs from a single donor (r=0.96–0.99, respectively). While intra-array concordance of replicate measurements (n=14642) was high (r>0.91) within each of 5 single cells from a single donor, comparison of 5-single cells from the same donor identified significant heterogeneity, when compared to the 10-cell and 100-cell sub-clusters (Figure 1). Individual genes characteristically expressed by these heterogeneous single cell populations are currently being investigated by FACS and Fluidigm arrays. A larger experiment characterizing 192 single progenitor cells, employing Agilent microarrays and RNA-Seq is currently in progress. Conclusions: Single cell transcriptome profiling is feasible, with best performance on 60-mer microarrays. Single cell transcriptomes exhibit lower, but reasonable levels of reproducibility (r>0.7) and precision as compared with higher cell numbers. Gene expression profiles of single cells capture gene expression heterogeneity in HSCs. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document