Reconstructing and analysing cellular states, space and time from gene expression profiles of many cells and single cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2690-2698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Francesconi ◽  
Ben Lehner
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Biological Sample ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Measurement ◽  
P Gene

Gene expression profiling is a fast, cheap and standardised analysis that provides a high dimensional measurement of the state of a biological sample, including of single cells. Computational methods to reconstruct the composition of samples and spatial and temporal information from expression profiles are described, as well as how they can be used to describe the effects of genetic variation.

scholarly journals P02.10 FocuSCOPE: a single cell, multi-omics solution to simultaneously analyze tumor variants and microenvironment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A12.1-A12
Author(s):  
Y Arjmand Abbassi ◽  
N Fang ◽  
W Zhu ◽  
Y Zhou ◽  
Y Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Single Cell Sequencing

Recent advances of high-throughput single cell sequencing technologies have greatly improved our understanding of the complex biological systems. Heterogeneous samples such as tumor tissues commonly harbor cancer cell-specific genetic variants and gene expression profiles, both of which have been shown to be related to the mechanisms of disease development, progression, and responses to treatment. Furthermore, stromal and immune cells within tumor microenvironment interact with cancer cells to play important roles in tumor responses to systematic therapy such as immunotherapy or cell therapy. However, most current high-throughput single cell sequencing methods detect only gene expression levels or epigenetics events such as chromatin conformation. The information on important genetic variants including mutation or fusion is not captured. To better understand the mechanisms of tumor responses to systematic therapy, it is essential to decipher the connection between genotype and gene expression patterns of both tumor cells and cells in the tumor microenvironment. We developed FocuSCOPE, a high-throughput multi-omics sequencing solution that can detect both genetic variants and transcriptome from same single cells. FocuSCOPE has been used to successfully perform single cell analysis of both gene expression profiles and point mutations, fusion genes, or intracellular viral sequences from thousands of cells simultaneously, delivering comprehensive insights of tumor and immune cells in tumor microenvironment at single cell resolution.Disclosure InformationY. Arjmand Abbassi: None. N. Fang: None. W. Zhu: None. Y. Zhou: None. Y. Chen: None. U. Deutsch: None.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling for Response Prediction of Rectal Adenocarcinomas to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1826-1838 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Michael Ghadimi ◽  
Marian Grade ◽  
Michael J. Difilippantonio ◽  
Sudhir Varma ◽  
Richard Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Response Prediction ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Correct Prediction

Purpose There is a wide spectrum of tumor responsiveness of rectal adenocarcinomas to preoperative chemoradiotherapy ranging from complete response to complete resistance. This study aimed to investigate whether parallel gene expression profiling of the primary tumor can contribute to stratification of patients into groups of responders or nonresponders. Patients and Methods Pretherapeutic biopsies from 30 locally advanced rectal carcinomas were analyzed for gene expression signatures using microarrays. All patients were participants of a phase III clinical trial (CAO/ARO/AIO-94, German Rectal Cancer Trial) and were randomized to receive a preoperative combined-modality therapy including fluorouracil and radiation. Class comparison was used to identify a set of genes that were differentially expressed between responders and nonresponders as measured by T level downsizing and histopathologic tumor regression grading. Results In an initial set of 23 patients, responders and nonresponders showed significantly different expression levels for 54 genes (P < .001). The ability to predict response to therapy using gene expression profiles was rigorously evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Tumor behavior was correctly predicted in 83% of patients (P = .02). Sensitivity (correct prediction of response) was 78%, and specificity (correct prediction of nonresponse) was 86%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 78% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion Our results suggest that pretherapeutic gene expression profiling may assist in response prediction of rectal adenocarcinomas to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The implementation of gene expression profiles for treatment stratification and clinical management of cancer patients requires validation in large, independent studies, which are now warranted.

Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Fundamental Differences between Leukemic Stem Cells (Lin-CD34+CD38−) and Mature Blasts (Lin−CD34+CD38+) of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Patients.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1377-1377
Author(s):  
Kazem Zibara ◽  
Daniel Pearce ◽  
David Taussig ◽  
Spyros Skoulakis ◽  
Simon Tomlinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Leukemic Stem Cells ◽  
Significant Differential Expression ◽  
New Genes

Abstract The identification of LSC has important implications for future research as well as for the development of novel therapies. The phenotypic description of LSC now enables their purification and should facilitate the identification of genes that are preferentially expressed in these cells compared to normal HSC. However, gene-expression profiling is usually conducted on mononuclear cells of AML patients from either peripheral blood and/or bone marrow. These samples contain a mixture of blasts cells, normal hematopoietic cells and limited number of leukemic stem cells. Thus, this results in a composite profile that obscure differences between LSC and blasts cells with low proliferative potential. The aim of this study was to compare the gene expression profile of highly purified LSC versus leukemic blasts in order to identify genes that might have important roles in driving the leukemia. For this purpose, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of highly purified LSCs (Lin−CD34+CD38−) and more mature blast cells (Lin−CD34+CD38+) isolated from 7 adult AML patients. All samples were previously tested for the ability of the Lin−CD34+CD38− cells but not the Lin−CD34+CD38+ fraction to engraft using the non-obese diabetic/severe combined immuno-deficiency (NOD-SCID) repopulation assay. Affymetrix microarrays (U133A chip), containing 22,283 genes, were used for the analysis. Comparison of Lin-CD34+CD38- cell population to the Lin−CD34+CD38+ cell fraction showed 5421 genes to be expressed in both fractions. Comparative analysis of gene-expression profiles showed statistically significant differential expression of 133 genes between the 2 cell populations. Most of the genes were downregulated in the LSC-enriched fraction, compared to the more differentiated fraction. Gene ontology was used to determine the categories of the up-regulated transcripts. These transcripts, which are selectively expressed, include a number of known genes (e.g., receptors, signalling genes, proliferation and cell cycle genes and transcription factors). These genes play important roles in differentiation, self-renewal, migration and adhesion of HSCs. Among the genes showing the highest differences in expression levels were the following: ribonucleotide reductase M2 polypeptide, thymidylate synthetase, ZW10 interactor, cathepsin G, azurocidin 1, topoisomerase II, CDC20, nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1, Rac GTPase activating protein 1, leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, myeloperoxidase, cyclin A1 (RRM2, TYMS, ZWINT, CTSG, AZU1, TOP2A, CDC20, NUSAP1, RACGAP1, LILRB2, PCNA, MPO, CCNA1). Some transcripts detected have not been implicated in HSC functions, and others have unknown function so far. This work identifies new genes that might play a role in leukemogenesis and cancer stem cells. It also leads to a better description and understanding of the molecular phenotypes of these 2 cell populations. Hence, in addition to being a more efficient way to further understand the biology of LSC, this should also provide a more efficient way of identifying new therapeutics and diagnostic targets.

scholarly journals Gene expression profiling of the Notch-AhR-IL22 axis at homeostasis and in response to tissue injury

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Weidenbusch ◽  
Severin Rodler ◽  
Shangqing Song ◽  
Simone Romoli ◽  
Julian A. Marschner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Tissue Injury ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Sterile Inflammation ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression

Notch and interleukin-22 (IL-22) signaling are known to regulate tissue homeostasis and respond to injury in humans and mice, and the induction of endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr) ligands through Notch links the two pathways in a hierarchical fashion. However in adults, the species-, organ- and injury-specific gene expression of the Notch-AhR-IL22 axis components is unknown. We therefore performed gene expression profiling of DLL1, DLL3, DLL4, DLK1, DLK2, JAG1, JAG2, Notch1, Notch2, Notch3, Notch4, ADAM17/TNF-α ADAM metalloprotease converting enzyme (TACE), PSEN1, basigin (BSG)/CD147, RBP-J, HES1, HES5, HEY1, HEYL, AHR, ARNT, ARNT2, CYP1A1, CYP24A1, IL-22, IL22RA1, IL22RA2, IL10RB, and STAT3 under homeostatic conditions in ten mature murine and human organs. Additionally, the expression of these genes was assessed in murine models of acute sterile inflammation and progressive fibrosis. We show that there are organ-specific gene expression profiles of the Notch-AhR-IL22 axis in humans and mice. Although there is an overall interspecies congruency, specific differences between human and murine expression signatures do exist. In murine tissues with AHR/ARNT expression CYP1A1 and IL-22 were correlated with HES5 and HEYL expression, while in human tissues no such correlation was found. Notch and AhR signaling are involved in renal inflammation and fibrosis with specific gene expression changes in each model. Despite the presence of all Notch pathway molecules in the kidney and a model-specific induction of Notch ligands, IL-22 was only up-regulated in acute inflammation, but rapidly down-regulated during regeneration. This implies that for targeting injury responses, e.g. via IL-22, species-specific differences, injury type and time points have to be considered.

scholarly journals Self-reporting transposons enable simultaneous readout of gene expression and transcription factor binding in single cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnav Moudgil ◽  
Michael N. Wilkinson ◽  
Xuhua Chen ◽  
June He ◽  
Alex J. Cammack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Specific Cell

AbstractIn situ measurements of transcription factor (TF) binding are confounded by cellular heterogeneity and represent averaged profiles in complex tissues. Single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is capable of resolving different cell types based on gene expression profiles, but no technology exists to directly link specific cell types to the binding pattern of TFs in those cell types. Here, we present self-reporting transposons (SRTs) and their use in single cell calling cards (scCC), a novel assay for simultaneously capturing gene expression profiles and mapping TF binding sites in single cells. First, we show how the genomic locations of SRTs can be recovered from mRNA. Next, we demonstrate that SRTs deposited by the piggyBac transposase can be used to map the genome-wide localization of the TFs SP1, through a direct fusion of the two proteins, and BRD4, through its native affinity for piggyBac. We then present the scCC method, which maps SRTs from scRNA-seq libraries, thus enabling concomitant identification of cell types and TF binding sites in those same cells. As a proof-of-concept, we show recovery of cell type-specific BRD4 and SP1 binding sites from cultured cells. Finally, we map Brd4 binding sites in the mouse cortex at single cell resolution, thus establishing a new technique for studying TF biology in situ.

scholarly journals Leader cells in collective chemotaxis: optimality and tradeoffs

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Hopkins ◽  
Brian A. Camley
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Sharp Transition ◽  
Leaders And Followers ◽  
Kinetics Of

Clusters of cells can work together in order to follow a signal gradient, chemotaxing even when single cells do not. Cells in different regions of collectively migrating neural crest streams show different gene expression profiles, suggesting that cells may specialize to leader and follower roles. We use a minimal mathematical model to understand when this specialization is advantageous. In our model, leader cells sense the gradient with an accuracy that depends on the kinetics of ligand-receptor binding while follower cells follow the cluster’s direction with a finite error. Intuitively, specialization into leaders and followers should be optimal when a few cells have more information than the rest of the cluster, such as in the presence of a sharp transition in chemoattractant concentration. We do find this – but also find that high levels of specialization can be optimal in the opposite limit of very shallow gradients. We also predict that the best location for leaders may not be at the front of the cluster. In following leaders, clusters may have to choose between speed and flexibility. Clusters with only a few leaders can take orders of magnitude more time to reorient than all-leader clusters.

scholarly journals In silico gene expression profiling in Cannabis sativa

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Massimino
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Cannabis Sativa ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Functional Genomic ◽  
Functional Genomic Data ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Scientific Papers

The cannabis plant and its active ingredients (i.e., cannabinoids and terpenoids) have been socially stigmatized for half a century. Luckily, with more than 430,000 published scientific papers and about 600 ongoing and completed clinical trials, nowadays cannabis is employed for the treatment of many different medical conditions. Nevertheless, even if a large amount of high-throughput functional genomic data exists, most researchers feature a strong background in molecular biology but lack advanced bioinformatics skills. In this work, publicly available gene expression datasets have been analyzed giving rise to a total of 40,224 gene expression profiles taken from cannabis plant tissue at different developmental stages. The resource presented here will provide researchers with a starting point for future investigations with Cannabis sativa.

scholarly journals An Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 Mouse Line for Simultaneous Readout of Lineage Histories and Gene Expression Profiles in Single Cells

Cell ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 181 (7) ◽  
pp. 1693-1694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Bowling ◽  
Duluxan Sritharan ◽  
Fernando G. Osorio ◽  
Maximilian Nguyen ◽  
Priscilla Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Mouse Line

Genome-Wide Profiling of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Multiple Myeloma: Overlaps with Myeloma Tumor Cells and Common Cancer Gene-Pathways.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 394-394
Author(s):  
Marc J. Braunstein ◽  
Daniel R. Carrasco ◽  
Fabien Campagne ◽  
Piali Mukherjee ◽  
Kumar Sukhdeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Cancer Biomarkers ◽  
Genome Wide

Abstract Background: In multiple myeloma (MM), bone-marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) contribute to tumor neoangiogenesis, and their levels covary with tumor mass and prognosis. Recent X-chromosome inactivation studies showed that EPCs are clonally restricted in MM. In addition, high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) found that the genomes of EPCs and MM cells display similar chromosomal gains and losses in the same patient. In this study, we performed an integrative analysis of EPCs and tumor cells by genome-wide expression profiling, and applied a bioinformatics approach that leverages gene expression data from cancer datasets to mine MM gene pathways common to multiple tumor tissues and likely involved in MM pathogenesis. Methods: Confluent EPCs (&gt;98% vWF/CD133/KDR+ and CD38−) were outgrown from 22 untreated MM patients’ bone marrow aspirates by adherence to laminin. The fractions enriched for tumor cells were &gt;50% CD38+. For gene expression profiling, total RNA from EPCs, MM cells, and control HUVECs were hybridized to cDNA microarrays, and comparisons were made by analysis of variance. Results: Two sets of EPC gene profiles were of particular interest. The first contained genes that differ significantly between EPCs and HUVEC, but not between EPCs and tumor (Profile 1). We hypothesize that this profile is a consequence of the clonal identity previously reported between EPCs and tumor, and that a subset of these genes is largely responsible for MM progression. The second set of important EPC genes are differentially regulated compared both to HUVECs and to tumor cells (Profile 2). These genes may represent the profile of EPCs that are clonally diverse from tumor cells but nevertheless display common gene expression patterns with other cancers. Profile 2 genes may also represent genes that confer a predisposition to clonal transformation of EPCs. When genes in Profile 1 and Profile 2 were overlapped with published lists of cancer biomarkers, significant similarities (P&lt;.05) were apparent. The largest overlaps were observed with the HM200 gene list, a list composed of 200 genes most consistently differentially expressed in human/mouse cancers (Campagne and Skrabanek, BMC Bioinformatics 2006). More than 80% of genes in either EPC profile have not been previously characterized in MM, but have been identified as cancer biomarkers in other cancer studies. These genes will be presented and discussed in the context of MM. Current studies are aimed at integrating Profile 1 and Profile 2 genes in each patient with chromosomal copy number abnormalities (CNAs) found in EPCs, and also with clinical stage and disease severity, in order to elucidate the pathogenic information that the profiles hold. Conclusions: The genomes of EPCs display ranges of overlap with tumor cells in MM, evidenced by gene expression profiles with varying similarity to those found in MM tumor cells. More importantly, MM EPC gene expression profiles, in contrast to normal endothelial cells, contain cancer biomarker genes in tumors not yet associated with MM. Results strongly support the concept that EPCs are an integral part of the neoplastic process in MM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document