scholarly journals Deep learning enables accurate clustering and batch effect removal in single-cell RNA-seq analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangjie Li ◽  
Yafei Lyu ◽  
Jihwan Park ◽  
Jingxiao Zhang ◽  
Dwight Stambolian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Batch Effects ◽  
Cluster Assignment ◽  
Cell Clustering ◽  
Deep Embedding ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Number Of Cells

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) can characterize cell types and states through unsupervised clustering, but the ever increasing number of cells imposes computational challenges. We present an unsupervised deep embedding algorithm for single-cell clustering (DESC) that iteratively learns cluster-specific gene expression signatures and cluster assignment. DESC significantly improves clustering accuracy across various datasets and is capable of removing complex batch effects while maintaining true biological variations.

scholarly journals Kidney pathological changes alter cell clustering features in single-cell RNA sequencing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Ma ◽  
Mariana Murea ◽  
Young A Choi ◽  
Ashok K. Hemal ◽  
Alexei V. Mikhailov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Kidney Tissue ◽  
Human Kidney ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Glomerular Injury ◽  
Cell Clustering ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

The kidney is composed of multiple cell types, each with specific physiological functions. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) is useful for classifying cell-specific gene expression profiles in kidney tissue. Because viable cells are critical in scRNA-Seq analyses, we report an optimized cell dissociation process and the necessity for histological screening of human kidney sections prior to performing scRNA-Seq. We show that glomerular injury can result in loss of select cell types during the cell clustering process. Subsequent fluorescence microscopy confirmed reductions in cell-specific markers among the injured cells seen on kidney sections and these changes need to be considered when interpreting results of scRNA-Seq.

scholarly journals JIND: Joint Integration and Discrimination for Automated Single-Cell Annotation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohit Goyal ◽  
Guillermo Serrano ◽  
Ilan Shomorony ◽  
Mikel Hernaez ◽  
Idoia Ochoa
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Specific Marker ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Batch Effects ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Latent Space ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Low Dimensional

AbstractSingle-cell RNA-seq is a powerful tool in the study of the cellular composition of different tissues and organisms. A key step in the analysis pipeline is the annotation of cell-types based on the expression of specific marker genes. Since manual annotation is labor-intensive and does not scale to large datasets, several methods for automated cell-type annotation have been proposed based on supervised learning. However, these methods generally require feature extraction and batch alignment prior to classification, and their performance may become unreliable in the presence of cell-types with very similar transcriptomic profiles, such as differentiating cells. We propose JIND, a framework for automated cell-type identification based on neural networks that directly learns a low-dimensional representation (latent code) in which cell-types can be reliably determined. To account for batch effects, JIND performs a novel asymmetric alignment in which the transcriptomic profile of unseen cells is mapped onto the previously learned latent space, hence avoiding the need of retraining the model whenever a new dataset becomes available. JIND also learns cell-type-specific confidence thresholds to identify and reject cells that cannot be reliably classified. We show on datasets with and without batch effects that JIND classifies cells more accurately than previously proposed methods while rejecting only a small proportion of cells. Moreover, JIND batch alignment is parallelizable, being more than five or six times faster than Seurat integration. Availability: https://github.com/mohit1997/JIND.

scholarly journals Cellular heterogeneity and lineage restriction during mouse digit tip regeneration at single cell resolution

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma L. Johnson ◽  
Erick J. Masias ◽  
Jessica A. Lehoczky
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Limb Regeneration ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cellular Heterogeneity ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Genetic Lineage ◽  
Epimorphic Regeneration ◽  
Related Cell ◽  
Lower Vertebrates ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

ABSTRACTInnate regeneration following digit tip amputation is one of the few examples of epimorphic regeneration in mammals. Digit tip regeneration is mediated by the blastema, the same structure invoked during limb regeneration in some lower vertebrates. By genetic lineage analyses in mice, the digit tip blastema has been defined as a population of heterogeneous, lineage restricted progenitor cells. These previous studies, however, do not comprehensively evaluate blastema heterogeneity or address lineage restriction of closely related cell types. In this report we present single cell RNA sequencing of over 38,000 cells from mouse digit tip blastemas and unamputated control digit tips and generate an atlas of the cell types participating in digit tip regeneration. We define the differentiation trajectories of vascular, monocytic, and fibroblastic lineages over regeneration, and while our data confirm broad lineage restriction of progenitors, our analysis reveals an early blastema fibroblast population expressing a novel regeneration-specific gene, Mest.

scholarly journals Impact of data preprocessing on cell-type clustering based on single-cell RNA-seq data

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiang Wang ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Juntao Liu
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Data Preprocessing ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Preprocessing Method ◽  
Cell Clustering ◽  
Cell Gene Expression

Abstract Background Advances in single-cell RNA-seq technology have led to great opportunities for the quantitative characterization of cell types, and many clustering algorithms have been developed based on single-cell gene expression. However, we found that different data preprocessing methods show quite different effects on clustering algorithms. Moreover, there is no specific preprocessing method that is applicable to all clustering algorithms, and even for the same clustering algorithm, the best preprocessing method depends on the input data. Results We designed a graph-based algorithm, SC3-e, specifically for discriminating the best data preprocessing method for SC3, which is currently the most widely used clustering algorithm for single cell clustering. When tested on eight frequently used single-cell RNA-seq data sets, SC3-e always accurately selects the best data preprocessing method for SC3 and therefore greatly enhances the clustering performance of SC3. Conclusion The SC3-e algorithm is practically powerful for discriminating the best data preprocessing method, and therefore largely enhances the performance of cell-type clustering of SC3. It is expected to play a crucial role in the related studies of single-cell clustering, such as the studies of human complex diseases and discoveries of new cell types.

scholarly journals STACAS: Sub-Type Anchor Correction for Alignment in Seurat to integrate single-cell RNA-seq data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Andreatta ◽  
Santiago J Carmona
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Distance Measure ◽  
Source Code ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
R Package ◽  
Computational Method ◽  
Biological Variability ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Batch Effects ◽  
Guide Trees

Abstract Summary STACAS is a computational method for the identification of integration anchors in the Seurat environment, optimized for the integration of single-cell (sc) RNA-seq datasets that share only a subset of cell types. We demonstrate that by (i) correcting batch effects while preserving relevant biological variability across datasets, (ii) filtering aberrant integration anchors with a quantitative distance measure and (iii) constructing optimal guide trees for integration, STACAS can accurately align scRNA-seq datasets composed of only partially overlapping cell populations. Availability and implementation Source code and R package available at https://github.com/carmonalab/STACAS; Docker image available at https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/mandrea1/stacas_demo.

scholarly journals Bulk Tissue Cell Type Deconvolution with Multi-Subject Single-Cell Expression Reference

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuran Wang ◽  
Jihwan Park ◽  
Katalin Susztak ◽  
Nancy R. Zhang ◽  
Mingyao Li
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cellular Heterogeneity ◽  
Tissue Cell ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Cell Expression

AbstractWe present MuSiC, a method that utilizes cell-type specific gene expression from single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data to characterize cell type compositions from bulk RNA-seq data in complex tissues. When applied to pancreatic islet and whole kidney expression data in human, mouse, and rats, MuSiC outperformed existing methods, especially for tissues with closely related cell types. MuSiC enables characterization of cellular heterogeneity of complex tissues for identification of disease mechanisms.

scholarly journals Splatter: simulation of single-cell RNA sequencing data

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Zappia ◽  
Belinda Phipson ◽  
Alicia Oshlack
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Sequencing Technologies ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Multiple Cell

AbstractAs single-cell RNA sequencing technologies have rapidly developed, so have analysis methods. Many methods have been tested, developed and validated using simulated datasets. Unfortunately, current simulations are often poorly documented, their similarity to real data is not demonstrated, or reproducible code is not available.Here we present the Splatter Bioconductor package for simple, reproducible and well-documented simulation of single-cell RNA-seq data. Splatter provides an interface to multiple simulation methods including Splat, our own simulation, based on a gamma-Poisson distribution. Splat can simulate single populations of cells, populations with multiple cell types or differentiation paths.

scholarly journals deepMNN: Deep Learning-Based Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Batch Correction Using Mutual Nearest Neighbors

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Zou ◽  
Tongda Zhang ◽  
Ruilong Zhou ◽  
Xiaosen Jiang ◽  
Huanming Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Batch Effect ◽  
Batch Effects ◽  
Batch Correction ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Identical Cell

It is well recognized that batch effect in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data remains a big challenge when integrating different datasets. Here, we proposed deepMNN, a novel deep learning-based method to correct batch effect in scRNA-seq data. We first searched mutual nearest neighbor (MNN) pairs across different batches in a principal component analysis (PCA) subspace. Subsequently, a batch correction network was constructed by stacking two residual blocks and further applied for the removal of batch effects. The loss function of deepMNN was defined as the sum of a batch loss and a weighted regularization loss. The batch loss was used to compute the distance between cells in MNN pairs in the PCA subspace, while the regularization loss was to make the output of the network similar to the input. The experiment results showed that deepMNN can successfully remove batch effects across datasets with identical cell types, datasets with non-identical cell types, datasets with multiple batches, and large-scale datasets as well. We compared the performance of deepMNN with state-of-the-art batch correction methods, including the widely used methods of Harmony, Scanorama, and Seurat V4 as well as the recently developed deep learning-based methods of MMD-ResNet and scGen. The results demonstrated that deepMNN achieved a better or comparable performance in terms of both qualitative analysis using uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots and quantitative metrics such as batch and cell entropies, ARI F1 score, and ASW F1 score under various scenarios. Additionally, deepMNN allowed for integrating scRNA-seq datasets with multiple batches in one step. Furthermore, deepMNN ran much faster than the other methods for large-scale datasets. These characteristics of deepMNN made it have the potential to be a new choice for large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis.

scholarly journals Gene length and detection bias in single cell RNA sequencing protocols

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda Phipson ◽  
Luke Zappia ◽  
Alicia Oshlack
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Length ◽  
Length Bias ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Full Length Transcript ◽  
Gene Length Bias

AbstractSingle cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has rapidly gained popularity for profiling transcriptomes of hundreds to thousands of single cells. This technology has led to the discovery of novel cell types and revealed insights into the development of complex tissues. However, many technical challenges need to be overcome during data generation. Due to minute amounts of starting material, samples undergo extensive amplification, increasing technical variability. A solution for mitigating amplification biases is to include Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs), which tag individual molecules. Transcript abundances are then estimated from the number of unique UMIs aligning to a specific gene and PCR duplicates resulting in copies of the UMI are not included in expression estimates. Here we investigate the effect of gene length bias in scRNA-Seq across a variety of datasets differing in terms of capture technology, library preparation, cell types and species. We find that scRNA-seq datasets that have been sequenced using a full-length transcript protocol exhibit gene length bias akin to bulk RNA-seq data. Specifically, shorter genes tend to have lower counts and a higher rate of dropout. In contrast, protocols that include UMIs do not exhibit gene length bias, and have a mostly uniform rate of dropout across genes of varying length. Across four different scRNA-Seq datasets profiling mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), we found the subset of genes that are only detected in the UMI datasets tended to be shorter, while the subset of genes detected only in the full-length datasets tended to be longer. We briefly discuss the role of these genes in the context of differential expression testing and GO analysis. In addition, despite clear differences between UMI and full-length transcript data, we illustrate that full-length and UMI data can be combined to reveal underlying biology influencing expression of mESCs.

scholarly journals A single cell transcriptome atlas of the developing zebrafish hindbrain

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Tambalo ◽  
Richard Mitter ◽  
David G. Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Neuronal Differentiation ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Spatial Patterning ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Valuable Resource ◽  
Dorsoventral Axis ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Transcriptome ◽  
Single Cell Transcriptome

AbstractSegmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain leads to the formation of rhombomeres, each with a distinct anteroposterior identity. Specialised boundary cells form at segment borders that act as a source or regulator of neuronal differentiation. In zebrafish, there is spatial patterning of neurogenesis in which non-neurogenic zones form at bounderies and segment centres, in part mediated by Fgf20 signaling. To further understand the control of neurogenesis, we have carried out single cell RNA sequencing of the zebrafish hindbrain at three different stages of patterning. Analyses of the data reveal known and novel markers of distinct hindbrain segments, of cell types along the dorsoventral axis, and of the transition of progenitors to neuronal differentiation. We find major shifts in the transcriptome of progenitors and of differentiating cells between the different stages analysed. Supervised clustering with markers of boundary cells and segment centres, together with RNA-seq analysis of Fgf-regulated genes, has revealed new candidate regulators of cell differentiation in the hindbrain. These data provide a valuable resource for functional investigations of the patterning of neurogenesis and the transition of progenitors to neuronal differentiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document