scholarly journals Splatter: simulation of single-cell RNA sequencing data

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Zappia ◽  
Belinda Phipson ◽  
Alicia Oshlack
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Sequencing Technologies ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Multiple Cell

AbstractAs single-cell RNA sequencing technologies have rapidly developed, so have analysis methods. Many methods have been tested, developed and validated using simulated datasets. Unfortunately, current simulations are often poorly documented, their similarity to real data is not demonstrated, or reproducible code is not available.Here we present the Splatter Bioconductor package for simple, reproducible and well-documented simulation of single-cell RNA-seq data. Splatter provides an interface to multiple simulation methods including Splat, our own simulation, based on a gamma-Poisson distribution. Splat can simulate single populations of cells, populations with multiple cell types or differentiation paths.

scholarly journals Distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron T. L. Lun ◽  
Samantha Riesenfeld ◽  
Tallulah Andrews ◽  
Tomas Gomes ◽  
John C. Marioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Minimum Threshold ◽  
False Discovery ◽  
Distinct Cell ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Unique Molecular Identifier

AbstractDroplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing protocols have dramatically increased the throughput and efficiency of single-cell transcriptomics studies. A key computational challenge when processing these data is to distinguish libraries for real cells from empty droplets. Existing methods for cell calling set a minimum threshold on the total unique molecular identifier (UMI) count for each library, which indiscriminately discards cell libraries with low UMI counts. Here, we describe a new statistical method for calling cells from droplet-based data, based on detecting significant deviations from the expression profile of the ambient solution. Using simulations, we demonstrate that our method has greater power than existing approaches for detecting cell libraries with low UMI counts, while controlling the false discovery rate among detected cells. We also apply our method to real data, where we show that the use of our method results in the retention of distinct cell types that would otherwise have been discarded.

scholarly journals Comparison of computational methods for imputing single-cell RNA-sequencing data

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihua Zhang ◽  
Shihua Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Imputation Methods ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

AbstractSingle-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a recent breakthrough technology, which paves the way for measuring RNA levels at single cell resolution to study precise biological functions. One of the main challenges when analyzing scRNA-seq data is the presence of zeros or dropout events, which may mislead downstream analyses. To compensate the dropout effect, several methods have been developed to impute gene expression since the first Bayesian-based method being proposed in 2016. However, these methods have shown very diverse characteristics in terms of model hypothesis and imputation performance. Thus, large-scale comparison and evaluation of these methods is urgently needed now. To this end, we compared eight imputation methods, evaluated their power in recovering original real data, and performed broad analyses to explore their effects on clustering cell types, detecting differentially expressed genes, and reconstructing lineage trajectories in the context of both simulated and real data. Simulated datasets and case studies highlight that there are no one method performs the best in all the situations. Some defects of these methods such as scalability, robustness and unavailability in some situations need to be addressed in future studies.

scholarly journals Uncovering hypergraphs of cell-cell interaction from single cell RNA-sequencing data

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koki Tsuyuzaki ◽  
Manabu Ishii ◽  
Itoshi Nikaido
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Interaction ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Sequencing Technologies ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Ligand Expression ◽  
Cell Cell

AbstractComplex biological systems can be described as a multitude of cell-cell interactions (CCIs). Recent single-cell RNA-sequencing technologies have enabled the detection of CCIs and related ligand-receptor (L-R) gene expression simultaneously. However, previous data analysis methods have focused on only one-to-one CCIs between two cell types. To also detect many-to-many CCIs, we proposescTensor, a novel method for extracting representative triadic relationships (hypergraphs), which include (i) ligand-expression, (ii) receptor-expression, and (iii) L-R pairs. When applied to simulated and empirical datasets,scTensorwas able to detect some hypergraphs including paracrine/autocrine CCI patterns, which cannot be detected by previous methods.

scholarly journals Single-cell data clustering based on sparse optimization and low-rank matrix factorization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinlei Hu ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Falai Chen ◽  
Kun Qu
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Matrix Factorization ◽  
Data Clustering ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Low Rank ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Rank Matrix ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Low Rank Matrix

Abstract Unsupervised clustering is a fundamental step of single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis. This issue has inspired several clustering methods to classify cells in single-cell RNA sequencing data. However, accurate prediction of the cell clusters remains a substantial challenge. In this study, we propose a new algorithm for single-cell RNA sequencing data clustering based on Sparse Optimization and low-rank matrix factorization (scSO). We applied our scSO algorithm to analyze multiple benchmark datasets and showed that the cluster number predicted by scSO was close to the number of reference cell types and that most cells were correctly classified. Our scSO algorithm is available at https://github.com/QuKunLab/scSO. Overall, this study demonstrates a potent cell clustering approach that can help researchers distinguish cell types in single-cell RNA sequencing data.

scholarly journals Evaluation of single-cell classifiers for single-cell RNA sequencing data sets

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1581-1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinlei Zhao ◽  
Shuang Wu ◽  
Nan Fang ◽  
Xiao Sun ◽  
Jue Fan
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Reference Data ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has been rapidly developing and widely applied in biological and medical research. Identification of cell types in scRNA-seq data sets is an essential step before in-depth investigations of their functional and pathological roles. However, the conventional workflow based on clustering and marker genes is not scalable for an increasingly large number of scRNA-seq data sets due to complicated procedures and manual annotation. Therefore, a number of tools have been developed recently to predict cell types in new data sets using reference data sets. These methods have not been generally adapted due to a lack of tool benchmarking and user guidance. In this article, we performed a comprehensive and impartial evaluation of nine classification software tools specifically designed for scRNA-seq data sets. Results showed that Seurat based on random forest, SingleR based on correlation analysis and CaSTLe based on XGBoost performed better than others. A simple ensemble voting of all tools can improve the predictive accuracy. Under nonideal situations, such as small-sized and class-imbalanced reference data sets, tools based on cluster-level similarities have superior performance. However, even with the function of assigning ‘unassigned’ labels, it is still challenging to catch novel cell types by solely using any of the single-cell classifiers. This article provides a guideline for researchers to select and apply suitable classification tools in their analysis workflows and sheds some lights on potential direction of future improvement on classification tools.

scholarly journals SSCC: a novel computational framework for rapid and accurate clustering large single cell RNA-seq data

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianwen Ren ◽  
Liangtao Zheng ◽  
Zemin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Random Projection ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Computational Framework ◽  
Human Blood Cells ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Data Volume

ABSTRACTClustering is a prevalent analytical means to analyze single cell RNA sequencing data but the rapidly expanding data volume can make this process computational challenging. New methods for both accurate and efficient clustering are of pressing needs. Here we proposed a new clustering framework based on random projection and feature construction for large scale single-cell RNA sequencing data, which greatly improves clustering accuracy, robustness and computational efficacy for various state-of-the-art algorithms benchmarked on multiple real datasets. On a dataset with 68,578 human blood cells, our method reached 20% improvements for clustering accuracy and 50-fold acceleration but only consumed 66% memory usage compared to the widely-used software package SC3. Compared to k-means, the accuracy improvement can reach 3-fold depending on the concrete dataset. An R implementation of the framework is available from https://github.com/Japrin/sscClust.

scholarly journals SPsimSeq: semi-parametric simulation of bulk and single cell RNA sequencing data

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alemu Takele Assefa ◽  
Jo Vandesompele ◽  
Olivier Thas
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Empirical Distribution ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Actual Distribution ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

SummarySPsimSeq is a semi-parametric simulation method for bulk and single cell RNA sequencing data. It simulates data from a good estimate of the actual distribution of a given real RNA-seq dataset. In contrast to existing approaches that assume a particular data distribution, our method constructs an empirical distribution of gene expression data from a given source RNA-seq experiment to faithfully capture the data characteristics of real data. Importantly, our method can be used to simulate a wide range of scenarios, such as single or multiple biological groups, systematic variations (e.g. confounding batch effects), and different sample sizes. It can also be used to simulate different gene expression units resulting from different library preparation protocols, such as read counts or UMI counts.Availability and implementationThe R package and associated documentation is available from https://github.com/CenterForStatistics-UGent/SPsimSeq.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at bioRχiv online.

scholarly journals IKAP—Identifying K mAjor cell Population groups in single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis

GigaScience ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Ching Chen ◽  
Abhilash Suresh ◽  
Chingiz Underbayev ◽  
Clare Sun ◽  
Komudi Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Sequencing Analysis ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Biologically Relevant ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Cell Groups ◽  
Cell Ontology

AbstractBackgroundIn single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis, clustering cells into groups and differentiating cell groups by differentially expressed (DE) genes are 2 separate steps for investigating cell identity. However, the ability to differentiate between cell groups could be affected by clustering. This interdependency often creates a bottleneck in the analysis pipeline, requiring researchers to repeat these 2 steps multiple times by setting different clustering parameters to identify a set of cell groups that are more differentiated and biologically relevant.FindingsTo accelerate this process, we have developed IKAP—an algorithm to identify major cell groups and improve differentiating cell groups by systematically tuning parameters for clustering. We demonstrate that, with default parameters, IKAP successfully identifies major cell types such as T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, and monocytes in 2 peripheral blood mononuclear cell datasets and recovers major cell types in a previously published mouse cortex dataset. These major cell groups identified by IKAP present more distinguishing DE genes compared with cell groups generated by different combinations of clustering parameters. We further show that cell subtypes can be identified by recursively applying IKAP within identified major cell types, thereby delineating cell identities in a multi-layered ontology.ConclusionsBy tuning the clustering parameters to identify major cell groups, IKAP greatly improves the automation of single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis to produce distinguishing DE genes and refine cell ontology using single-cell RNA-sequencing data.

scholarly journals SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data

GigaScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D Young ◽  
Sam Behjati
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Sequencing Technologies ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Biological Interpretation ◽  
Downstream Analysis ◽  
Cell Expression ◽  
Rna Contamination

Abstract Background Droplet-based single-cell RNA sequence analyses assume that all acquired RNAs are endogenous to cells. However, any cell-free RNAs contained within the input solution are also captured by these assays. This sequencing of cell-free RNA constitutes a background contamination that confounds the biological interpretation of single-cell transcriptomic data. Results We demonstrate that contamination from this "soup" of cell-free RNAs is ubiquitous, with experiment-specific variations in composition and magnitude. We present a method, SoupX, for quantifying the extent of the contamination and estimating "background-corrected" cell expression profiles that seamlessly integrate with existing downstream analysis tools. Applying this method to several datasets using multiple droplet sequencing technologies, we demonstrate that its application improves biological interpretation of otherwise misleading data, as well as improving quality control metrics. Conclusions We present SoupX, a tool for removing ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing experiments. This tool has broad applicability, and its application can improve the biological utility of existing and future datasets.

scholarly journals scConsensus: combining supervised and unsupervised clustering for cell type identification in single-cell RNA sequencing data

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Ranjan ◽  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
Wenjie Sun ◽  
Jinyu Park ◽  
Mohammad Amin Honardoost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Unsupervised Clustering ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing

Abstract Background Clustering is a crucial step in the analysis of single-cell data. Clusters identified in an unsupervised manner are typically annotated to cell types based on differentially expressed genes. In contrast, supervised methods use a reference panel of labelled transcriptomes to guide both clustering and cell type identification. Supervised and unsupervised clustering approaches have their distinct advantages and limitations. Therefore, they can lead to different but often complementary clustering results. Hence, a consensus approach leveraging the merits of both clustering paradigms could result in a more accurate clustering and a more precise cell type annotation. Results We present scConsensus, an $${\mathbf {R}}$$ R framework for generating a consensus clustering by (1) integrating results from both unsupervised and supervised approaches and (2) refining the consensus clusters using differentially expressed genes. The value of our approach is demonstrated on several existing single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, including data from sorted PBMC sub-populations. Conclusions scConsensus combines the merits of unsupervised and supervised approaches to partition cells with better cluster separation and homogeneity, thereby increasing our confidence in detecting distinct cell types. scConsensus is implemented in $${\mathbf {R}}$$ R and is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/prabhakarlab/scConsensus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document