scholarly journals The effects of a TMS double lesion to a cortical network

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian G.M. Cameron ◽  
Andreea Cretu ◽  
Femke Struik ◽  
Ivan Toni
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Network Nodes ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal ◽  
Functional Consequences ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Theta Burst ◽  
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation ◽  
Single Lesion

AbstractTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has contributed to our understanding of the functions of individual brain regions, but its use to examine distributed functions throughout a network has been more limited. We assess the functional consequences of a TMS pulse to the oculomotor network which was first perturbed by continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), to examine the potential for additive effects from lesions to two network nodes. Twenty-three humans performed pro-(look towards) and anti-(look away) saccades after receiving cTBS to right frontal eye fields (FEF), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or somatosensory cortex (S1) (control). On a subset of trials, a TMS pulse was applied to right posterior parietal cortex (PPC). We assessed changes in saccade amplitudes, performance (percentage correct) and reaction times, as these parameters relate to computations in networks involving these nodes. We observed impairments in ipsilateral anti-saccade amplitudes following DLPFC cTBS that were enhanced by a PPC pulse, but that were not enhanced relative to the effect of the PPC pulse alone. There was no evidence for effects from the double lesion to performance or reaction times. This suggests that computations are distributed across the network, such that even a single lesion is consequential.

Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Theta Burst Stimulation for Modulating the Posterior Parietal Cortex

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (09) ◽  
pp. 972-984
Author(s):  
Tian Gan ◽  
Stevan Nikolin ◽  
Colleen K. Loo ◽  
Donel M. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Theta Burst Stimulation ◽  
Burst Stimulation ◽  
High Definition ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Theta Burst

AbstractObjectives:Noninvasive brain stimulation methods, including high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) and theta burst stimulation (TBS) have emerged as novel tools to modulate and explore brain function. However, the relative efficacy of these newer stimulation approaches for modulating cognitive functioning remains unclear. This study investigated the cognitive effects of HD-tDCS, intermittent TBS (iTBS) and prolonged continuous TBS (ProcTBS) and explored the potential of these approaches for modulating hypothesized functions of the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC).Methods:Twenty-two healthy volunteers attended four experimental sessions in a cross-over experimental design. In each session, participants either received HD-tDCS, iTBS, ProcTBS or sham, and completed cognitive tasks, including a divided attention task, a working memory maintenance task and an attention task (emotional Stroop test).Results:The results showed that compared to sham, HD-tDCS, iTBS and ProcTBS caused significantly faster response times on the emotional Stroop task. The effect size (Cohen’sd) wasd= .32 for iTBS (p< .001), .21 for ProcTBS (p= .01) and .15 for HD-tDCS (p= .044). However, for the performance on the divided attention and working memory maintenance tasks, no significant effect of stimulation was found.Conclusions:The results suggest that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques, including TBS, may have greater efficacy for modulating cognition compared with HD-tDCS, and extend existing knowledge about specific functions of the left PPC.

Reduced Cognitive Control Demands after Practice of Saccade Tasks in a Trial Type Probability Manipulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan E. Pierce ◽  
Jennifer E. McDowell
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Trial Type ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Mirror Image ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Practice Group ◽  
Task Practice ◽  
Posterior Parietal

Cognitive control is engaged to facilitate stimulus–response mappings for novel, complex tasks and supervise performance in unfamiliar, challenging contexts—processes supported by pFC, ACC, and posterior parietal cortex. With repeated task practice, however, the appropriate task set can be selected in a more automatic fashion with less need for top–down cognitive control and weaker activation in these brain regions. One model system for investigating cognitive control is the ocular motor circuitry underlying saccade production, with basic prosaccade trials (look toward a stimulus) and complex antisaccade trials (look to the mirror image location) representing low and high levels of cognitive control, respectively. Previous studies have shown behavioral improvements on saccade tasks after practice with contradictory results regarding the direction of functional MRI BOLD signal change. The current study presented healthy young adults with prosaccade and antisaccade trials in five mixed blocks with varying probability of each trial type (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% anti vs. pro) at baseline and posttest MRI sessions. Between the scans, participants practiced either the specific probability blocks used during testing or only a general 100% antisaccade block. Results indicated an overall reduction in BOLD activation within pFC, ACC, and posterior parietal cortex and across saccade circuitry for antisaccade trials. The specific practice group showed additional regions including ACC, insula, and thalamus with an activation decrease after practice, whereas the general practice group showed a little change from baseline in those clusters. These findings demonstrate that cognitive control regions recruited to support novel task behaviors were engaged less after practice, especially with exposure to mixed task contexts rather than a novel task in isolation.

Effects of Gaze Direction in Vision and Audition

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 137-137
Author(s):  
W H Ehrenstein ◽  
J Lewald ◽  
L Schlykowa
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Visual Sensitivity ◽  
Gaze Direction ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Visual Shift ◽  
Stimulus Speed ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Visual Reference

We asked to what extent the respective gaze direction influences (i) the spatial congruence of perceived direction of auditory and visual cues, and (ii) the discrimination of the direction of target motion. With fixed head position, subjects directed their gaze in various positions and localised auditory targets (band-pass noise, 2 kHz) presented at one of nine positions (straight ahead, or four symmetric positions to the left or right separated by 2.75 deg, respectively). Forced-choice judgements, whether the sound was perceived to the left or right of a visual reference light, show that the azimuth of the sound was perceived as slightly shifted to the left of a visual reference when the gaze was directed to the left, and vice versa. The maximum of this relative auditory - visual shift was 4.7 deg over a range of 45 deg (left or right) of gaze directions. In (ii), a spot of light started at the centre of a monitor and moved at 2 or 12 deg s−1 leftward or rightward. Subjects reported the direction by pressing a key; their gaze was directed at 0, 8, or 16 deg to the left or right. Mean choice-reaction times increased with increasing gaze eccentricity, but differently depending on stimulus direction and speed: with left fixation they were shorter for leftward than rightward motion; with right fixation they were shorter for rightward motion. This effect was stronger for the slow than for the fast stimulus speed. Thus, facilitation occurs when stimuli move with moderate velocity toward the direction of gaze. While the auditory-visual shift in (i) may reflect an incomplete transformation of spatial (craniocentric and oculocentric) coordinates as suggested by recordings in the primate midbrain, the results in (ii) conform with reports of specialised units in the posterior parietal cortex (areas LIP, 7a, MST) that, in registering oculomotor position, modulate visual sensitivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document