scholarly journals Pioneering, chromatin remodeling, and epigenetic constraint in early T-cell gene regulation by PU.1

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Ungerbäck ◽  
Hiroyuki Hosokawa ◽  
Xun Wang ◽  
Tobias Strid ◽  
Brian A. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Site Quality ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

AbstractPU.1 is a dominant but transient regulator in early T-cell precursors and a potent transcriptional controller of developmentally important pro-T cell genes. Before T-lineage commitment, open chromatin is frequently occupied by PU.1, and many PU.1 sites lose accessibility when PU.1 is later downregulated. Pioneering activity of PU.1 was tested in in this developmentally dynamic context, by quantitating the relationships between PU.1 occupancy and site quality and accessibility as PU.1 levels naturally declined in pro-T cell development, and by using stage-specific gain and loss of function perturbations to relate binding to effects on target genes. PU.1 could bind closed genomic sites, but rapidly opened many of them, despite the absence of its frequent collaborators, C/EBP factors. The dynamic properties of PU.1 engagements implied that PU.1 binding affinity and concentration determine its occupancy choices, but with quantitative tradeoffs for occupancy between site sequence quality and stage-dependent site accessibility in chromatin. At non-promoter sites PU.1 binding criteria were more stringent than at promoters, and PU.1 was also much more effective as a transcriptional regulator at non-promoter sites where local chromatin accessibility depended on the presence of PU.1. Runx motifs and Runx1 binding were often linked to PU.1 at open sites, but highly expressed PU.1 could bind its sites without Runx1. Notably, closed chromatin presented a qualitative barrier to occupancy by the PU.1 DNA binding domain alone. Thus, effective pioneering at closed chromatin sites also depends on requirements beyond site recognition served by non-DNA binding domains of PU.1.

scholarly journals SATB1 Cleavage by Caspase 6 Disrupts PDZ Domain-Mediated Dimerization, Causing Detachment from Chromatin Early in T-Cell Apoptosis

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5591-5604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Galande ◽  
Liliane A. Dickinson ◽  
I. Saira Mian ◽  
Marianna Sikorska ◽  
Terumi Kohwi-Shigematsu
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Apoptosis ◽  
Pdz Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
T Cell Apoptosis ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Caspase 6 ◽  
Loop Domains

ABSTRACT SATB1 is expressed primarily in thymocytes and orchestrates temporal and spatial expression of a large number of genes in the T-cell lineage. SATB1 binds to the bases of chromatin loop domains in vivo, recognizing a special DNA context with strong base-unpairing propensity. The majority of thymocytes are eliminated by apoptosis due to selection processes in the thymus. We investigated the fate of SATB1 during thymocyte and T-cell apoptosis. Here we show that SATB1 is specifically cleaved by a caspase 6-like protease at amino acid position 254 to produce a 65-kDa major fragment containing both a base-unpairing region (BUR)-binding domain and a homeodomain. We found that this cleavage separates the DNA-binding domains from amino acids 90 to 204, a region which we show to be a dimerization domain. The resulting SATB1 monomer loses its BUR-binding activity, despite containing both its DNA-binding domains, and rapidly dissociates from chromatin in vivo. We found this dimerization region to have sequence similarity to PDZ domains, which have been previously shown to be involved in signaling by conferring protein-protein interactions. SATB1 cleavage during Jurkat T-cell apoptosis induced by an anti-Fas antibody occurs concomitantly with the high-molecular-weight fragmentation of chromatin of ∼50-kb fragments. Our results suggest that mechanisms of nuclear degradation early in apoptotic T cells involve efficient removal of SATB1 by disrupting its dimerization and cleavage of genomic DNA into loop domains to ensure rapid and efficient disassembly of higher-order chromatin structure.

scholarly journals The PAX3-FKHR fusion protein created by the t(2;13) translocation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas is a more potent transcriptional activator than PAX3.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1522-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
W J Fredericks ◽  
N Galili ◽  
S Mukhopadhyay ◽  
G Rovera ◽  
J Bennicelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Polypeptide

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas are pediatric solid tumors with a hallmark cytogenetic abnormality: translocation of chromosomes 2 and 13 [t(2;13) (q35;q14)]. The genes on each chromosome involved in this translocation have been identified as the transcription factor-encoding genes PAX3 and FKHR. The NH2-terminal paired box and homeodomain DNA-binding domains of PAX3 are fused in frame to COOH-terminal regions of the chromosome 13-derived FKHR gene, a novel member of the forkhead DNA-binding domain family. To determine the role of the fusion protein in transcriptional regulation and oncogenesis, we identified the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein and characterized its function(s) as a transcription factor relative to wild-type PAX3. Antisera specific to PAX3 and FKHR were developed and used to examine PAX3 and PAX3-FKHR expression in tumor cell lines. Sequential immunoprecipitations with anti-PAX3 and anti-FKHR sera demonstrated expression of a 97-kDa PAX3-FKHR fusion protein in the t(2;13)-positive rhabdomyosarcoma Rh30 cell line and verified that a single polypeptide contains epitopes derived from each protein. The PAX3-FKHR protein was localized to the nucleus in Rh30 cells, as was wild-type PAX3, in t(2;13)-negative A673 cells. In gel shift assays using a canonical PAX binding site (e5 sequence), we found that DNA binding of PAX3-FKHR was significantly impaired relative to that of PAX3 despite the two proteins having identical PAX DNA-binding domains. However, the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein was a much more potent transcriptional activator than PAX3 as determined by transient cotransfection assays using e5-CAT reporter plasmids. The PAX3-FKHR protein may function as an oncogenic transcription factor by enhanced activation of normal PAX3 target genes.

scholarly journals SelexGLM differentiates androgen and glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding preference over an extended binding site

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyang Zhang ◽  
Gabriella D. Martini ◽  
H. Tomas Rube ◽  
Judith F. Kribelbauer ◽  
Chaitanya Rastogi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Isothermal Calorimetry ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Relative Preference ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Prostate Cancers

ABSTRACTThe DNA-binding interfaces of the androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors are virtually identical, yet these transcription factors share only about a third of their genomic binding sites and regulate similarly distinct sets of target genes. To address this paradox, we determined the intrinsic specificities of the AR and GR DNA binding domains using a refined version of SELEX-seq. We developed an algorithm, SelexGLM, that quantifies binding specificity over a large (31 bp) binding-site by iteratively fitting a feature-based generalized linear model to SELEX probe counts. This analysis revealed that the DNA binding preferences of AR and GR homodimers differ significantly, both within and outside the 15bp core binding site. The relative preference between the two factors can be tuned over a wide range by changing the DNA sequence, with AR more sensitive to sequence changes than GR. The specificity of AR extends to the regions flanking the core 15bp site, where isothermal calorimetry measurements reveal that affinity is augmented by enthalpy-driven readout of poly-A sequences associated with narrowed minor groove width. We conclude that the increased specificity of AR is correlated with more enthalpy-driven binding than GR. The binding models help explain differences in AR and GR genomic binding, and provide a biophysical rationale for how promiscuous binding by GR allows functional substitution for AR in some castration-resistant prostate cancers.

Cooperative interactions between paired domain and homeodomain

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2639-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jun ◽  
C. Desplan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Cooperative Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The Pax proteins are a family of transcriptional regulators involved in many developmental processes in all higher eukaryotes. They are characterized by the presence of a paired domain (PD), a bipartite DNA binding domain composed of two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs, the PAI and RED domains. The PD is also often associated with a homeodomain (HD) which is itself able to form homo- and hetero-dimers on DNA. Many of these proteins therefore contain three HTH motifs each able to recognize DNA. However, all PDs recognize highly related DNA sequences, and most HDs also recognize almost identical sites. We show here that different Pax proteins use multiple combinations of their HTHs to recognize several types of target sites. For instance, the Drosophila Paired protein can bind, in vitro, exclusively through its PAI domain, or through a dimer of its HD, or through cooperative interaction between PAI domain and HD. However, prd function in vivo requires the synergistic action of both the PAI domain and the HD. Pax proteins with only a PD appear to require both PAI and RED domains, while a Pax-6 isoform and a new Pax protein, Lune, may rely on the RED domain and HD. We propose a model by which Pax proteins recognize different target genes in vivo through various combinations of their DNA binding domains, thus expanding their recognition repertoire.

scholarly journals DNA-binding specificity of NGFI-A and related zinc finger transcription factors.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 2275-2287 ◽  
Author(s):  
A H Swirnoff ◽  
J Milbrandt
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Random Site

NGFI-A is the prototypic member of a family of immediate-early gene-encoded transcription factors which includes NGFI-C, Egr3, and Krox20. These proteins possess highly homologous DNA-binding domains, composed of three Cys2-His2 zinc fingers, and all bind to and activate transcription from the sequence GCGGGGGCG. We used a PCR-mediated random site selection protocol to determine whether other sites could be bound by these proteins and the extent to which their binding site preferences are similar or different. The high-affinity consensus sites generated from the selection data are similar, and the combined consensus sequence is T-G-C-G-T/g-G/A-G-G-C/a/t-G-G/T (lowercase letters indicate bases selected less frequently). Using gel shift assays, we found that sequences that diverge from the consensus were bound by NGFI-A, confirming that there is greater variability in binding sites than has generally been acknowledged. We also provide evidence that protein-DNA interactions not noted, or whose importance was not apparent from the X-ray cocrystal structure of the NGFI-A zinc fingers complexed with DNA, contribute significantly to the binding energy of these proteins and confirm that an optimal site is at least 10 instead of 9 nucleotides in length. In contrast to the similarities in binding specificity among these proteins we found that while NGFI-A, Egr3, and Krox20 have comparable DNA binding affinities and kinetics of dissociation, the affinity of NGFI-C is more than threefold lower. This could result in differential regulation of target genes in cells where NGFI-C and the other proteins are coexpressed. Furthermore, we show that this affinity difference is a property not of the zinc fingers themselves but rather of the protein context of the DNA-binding domain.

scholarly journals Induction of Candida albicans Drug Resistance Genes by Hybrid Zinc Cluster Transcription Factors

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 558-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Schneider ◽  
Joachim Morschhäuser
Keyword(s):  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Efflux Pumps ◽  
Pathogenic Yeast ◽  
Fluconazole Resistance ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Zinc Cluster ◽  
Binding Domains

ABSTRACTThe pathogenic yeastCandida albicanscan develop resistance to azole antifungal drugs by overexpressingERG11, which encodes the drug target, or the multidrug efflux pumpsMDR1andCDR1/CDR2. The constitutive upregulation of these genes is usually caused by gain-of-function mutations in the zinc cluster transcription factors Upc2, Mrr1, and Tac1, respectively. These transcription factors are also required for the induction of their target genes in drug-susceptible strains in the presence of specific stimuli. By swapping the DNA-binding domains of Mrr1, Tac1, and Upc2 we investigated if the hybrid transcription factors could activate their new target genes in response to the same signals. When Tac1 was targeted to theMDR1andERG11promoters, the expression of these genes became inducible by fluphenazine. Similarly,MDR1andCDR2were strongly upregulated by fluconazole when Upc2 was fused to the DNA-binding domains of Mrr1 and Tac1, respectively. In contrast, Mrr1 was unable to promote gene expression in response to benomyl when it was targeted to theCDR2andERG11promoters instead of theMDR1promoter. These results suggest that Tac1 and Upc2 themselves are activated by the inducers fluphenazine and fluconazole, respectively, whereas benomyl does not activate Mrr1 itself but a coregulatory factor that is present at the promoters of Mrr1 target genes. Strains in which the expression levels of Mrr1 and Tac1 target genes were controlled by Upc2 exhibited increased fluconazole resistance, demonstrating that the ability to efficiently upregulate the expression of efflux pumps in the presence of the drug results in enhanced intrinsic fluconazole resistance.

scholarly journals A Study of p53 Action on DNA at the Single Molecule Level

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoto Kamagata
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Diffusion Mechanism ◽  
Target Search ◽  
Single Molecule Level ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Biophysical Study ◽  
Model Protein

The transcription factor p53 searches for and binds to target sequences within long genomic DNA, to regulate downstream gene expression. p53 possesses multiple disordered and DNA-binding domains, which are frequently observed in DNA-binding proteins. Owing to these properties, p53 is used as a model protein for target search studies. It counters cell stress by utilizing a facilitated diffusion mechanism that combines 3D diffusion in solution, 1D sliding along DNA, hopping/jumping along DNA, and intersegmental transfer between two DNAs. Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy has been used to characterize individual motions of p53 in detail. In addition, a biophysical study has revealed that p53 forms liquid-like droplets involving the functional switch. In this chapter, the target search and regulation of p53 are discussed in terms of dynamic properties.

scholarly journals B-Cell Coactivator OBF-1 Exhibits Unusual Transcriptional Properties and Functions in a DNA-Bound Oct-1-Dependent Fashion

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 4247-4254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Krapp ◽  
Michel Strubin
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

ABSTRACT Eukaryotic transcriptional activators generally comprise both a DNA-binding domain that recognizes specific cis-regulatory elements in the target genes and an activation domain which is essential for transcriptional stimulation. Activation domains typically behave as structurally and functionally autonomous modules that retain their intrinsic activities when directed to a promoter by a variety of heterologous DNA-binding domains. Here we report that OBF-1, a B-cell-specific coactivator for transcription factor Oct-1, challenges this traditional view in that it contains an atypical activation domain that exhibits two unexpected functional properties when tested in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. First, OBF-1 by itself has essentially no intrinsic activation potential, yet it strongly synergizes with other activation domains such as VP16 and Gal4. Second, OBF-1 exerts its effect in association with DNA-bound Oct-1 but is inactive when attached to a heterologous DNA-binding domain. These findings suggest that activation by OBF-1 is not obtained by simple recruitment of the coactivator to the promoter but requires interaction with DNA-bound Oct-1 to stimulate a step distinct from those regulated by classical activation domains.

Identification of androgen-selective androgen-response elements in the human aquaporin-5 and Rad9 genes

2008 ◽  
Vol 411 (3) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Moehren ◽  
Sarah Denayer ◽  
Michael Podvinec ◽  
Guy Verrijdt ◽  
Frank Claessens
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Aquaporin 5 ◽  
Band Shift ◽  
Strong Activity ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The AR (androgen receptor) is known to influence the expression of its target genes by binding to different sets of AREs (androgen-response elements) in the DNA. One set consists of the classical steroid-response elements which are partial palindromic repeats of the 5′-TGTTCT-3′ steroid-receptor monomer-binding element. The second set contains motifs that are AR-specific and that are proposed to be partial direct repeats of the same motif. On the basis of this assumption, we used an in silico approach to identify new androgen-selective AREs in the regulatory regions of known androgen-responsive genes. We have used an extension of the NUBIScan algorithm to screen a collection of 85 known human androgen-responsive genes compiled from literature and database searches. We report the evaluation of the most promising hits resulting from this computational search by in vitro DNA-binding assays using full-size ARs and GRs (glucocorticoid receptors) as well as their isolated DBDs (DNA-binding domains). We also describe the ability of some of these motifs to confer androgen-, but not glucocorticoid-, responsiveness to reporter-gene expression. The elements found in the aquaporin-5 and the Rad9 (radiation-sensitive 9) genes showed selective AR versus GR binding in band-shift assays and a strong activity and selectivity in functional assays, both as isolated elements and in their original contexts. Our data indicate the validity of the hypothesis that selective AREs are recognizable as direct 5′-TGTTCT-3′ repeats, and extend the list of currently known selective elements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document