Identification of androgen-selective androgen-response elements in the human aquaporin-5 and Rad9 genes

2008 ◽  
Vol 411 (3) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Moehren ◽  
Sarah Denayer ◽  
Michael Podvinec ◽  
Guy Verrijdt ◽  
Frank Claessens
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Aquaporin 5 ◽  
Band Shift ◽  
Strong Activity ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The AR (androgen receptor) is known to influence the expression of its target genes by binding to different sets of AREs (androgen-response elements) in the DNA. One set consists of the classical steroid-response elements which are partial palindromic repeats of the 5′-TGTTCT-3′ steroid-receptor monomer-binding element. The second set contains motifs that are AR-specific and that are proposed to be partial direct repeats of the same motif. On the basis of this assumption, we used an in silico approach to identify new androgen-selective AREs in the regulatory regions of known androgen-responsive genes. We have used an extension of the NUBIScan algorithm to screen a collection of 85 known human androgen-responsive genes compiled from literature and database searches. We report the evaluation of the most promising hits resulting from this computational search by in vitro DNA-binding assays using full-size ARs and GRs (glucocorticoid receptors) as well as their isolated DBDs (DNA-binding domains). We also describe the ability of some of these motifs to confer androgen-, but not glucocorticoid-, responsiveness to reporter-gene expression. The elements found in the aquaporin-5 and the Rad9 (radiation-sensitive 9) genes showed selective AR versus GR binding in band-shift assays and a strong activity and selectivity in functional assays, both as isolated elements and in their original contexts. Our data indicate the validity of the hypothesis that selective AREs are recognizable as direct 5′-TGTTCT-3′ repeats, and extend the list of currently known selective elements.

Cooperative interactions between paired domain and homeodomain

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2639-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jun ◽  
C. Desplan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Cooperative Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The Pax proteins are a family of transcriptional regulators involved in many developmental processes in all higher eukaryotes. They are characterized by the presence of a paired domain (PD), a bipartite DNA binding domain composed of two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs, the PAI and RED domains. The PD is also often associated with a homeodomain (HD) which is itself able to form homo- and hetero-dimers on DNA. Many of these proteins therefore contain three HTH motifs each able to recognize DNA. However, all PDs recognize highly related DNA sequences, and most HDs also recognize almost identical sites. We show here that different Pax proteins use multiple combinations of their HTHs to recognize several types of target sites. For instance, the Drosophila Paired protein can bind, in vitro, exclusively through its PAI domain, or through a dimer of its HD, or through cooperative interaction between PAI domain and HD. However, prd function in vivo requires the synergistic action of both the PAI domain and the HD. Pax proteins with only a PD appear to require both PAI and RED domains, while a Pax-6 isoform and a new Pax protein, Lune, may rely on the RED domain and HD. We propose a model by which Pax proteins recognize different target genes in vivo through various combinations of their DNA binding domains, thus expanding their recognition repertoire.

Androgen-receptor-specific DNA binding to an element in the first exon of the human secretory component gene

2001 ◽  
Vol 353 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemie HAELENS ◽  
Guy VERRIJDT ◽  
Leen CALLEWAERT ◽  
Ben PEETERS ◽  
Wilfried ROMBAUTS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Secretory Component ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

Androgens and glucocorticoids are steroid hormones, which exert their effects in vivo by binding and activating their cognate receptors. These intracellular receptors are transcription factors that can bind specific DNA sequences, called hormone response elements, located near the target genes. Although the androgen receptor (AR) and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) bind the same consensus DNA sequence, androgen-specific responses can be achieved by non-conventional androgen response elements (AREs). Here we determine the specificity mechanism of such a selective element recently identified in the first exon of the human gene for secretory component (sc ARE). This sc ARE consists of two receptor-binding hexamers separated by three nucleotides. The DNA-binding domains of the AR and GR both bind the sc ARE, but, although the AR fragment dimerizes on the element, the GR fragment does not. Comparing the affinities of the DNA-binding domains for mutant forms of the sc ARE revealed that dimeric GR binding is actively excluded by the left hexamer and more precisely by the presence of a G residue at position -3, relative to the central spacer nucleotide. Inserting a G at this position changed a non-selective element into an androgen-selective one. We postulate that the AR recognizes the sc ARE as a direct repeat of two 5′-TGTTCT-3′-like core sequences instead of the classical inverted repeat. Direct repeat binding is not possible for the GR, thus explaining the selectivity of the sc ARE. This alternative dimerization by the AR on the sc ARE is also indicated by the DNA-binding characteristics of receptor fragments in which the dimerization interfaces were swapped. In addition, the flanking and spacer sequences seem to affect the functionality of the sc ARE.

scholarly journals Differential DNA binding by the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors involves the second Zn-finger and a C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domains

1999 ◽  
Vol 341 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik SCHOENMAKERS ◽  
Philippe ALEN ◽  
Guy VERRIJDT ◽  
Ben PEETERS ◽  
Guido VERHOEVEN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptors ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Binding Domains

The androgen and glucocorticoid hormones evoke specific in vivo responses by activating different sets of responsive genes. Although the consensus sequences of the glucocorticoid and androgen response elements are very similar, this in vivo specificity can in some cases be explained by differences in DNA recognition between both receptors. This has clearly been demonstrated for the androgen response element PB-ARE-2 described in the promoter of the rat probasin gene. Swapping of different fragments between the androgen- and glucocorticoid-receptor DNA-binding domains demonstrates that (i) the first Zn-finger module is not involved in this sequence selectivity and (ii) that residues in the second Zn-finger as well as a C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domain from the androgen receptor are required. For specific and high-affinity binding to response elements, the DNA-binding domains of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors need a different C-terminal extension. The glucocorticoid receptor requires 12 C-terminal amino acids for high affinity DNA binding, while the androgen receptor only involves four residues. However, for specific recognition of the PB-ARE-2, the androgen receptor also requires 12 C-terminal residues. Our data demonstrate that the mechanism by which the androgen receptor binds selectively to the PB-ARE-2 is different from that used by the glucocorticoid receptor to bind a consensus response element. We would like to suggest that the androgen receptor recognizes response elements as a direct repeat rather than the classical inverted repeat.

scholarly journals Role of Papillomavirus E1 Initiator Dimerization in DNA Replication

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (13) ◽  
pp. 8661-8664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Schuck ◽  
Arne Stenlund
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Severe Effect ◽  
Origin Of Dna Replication ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

ABSTRACT Viral initiator proteins are polypeptides that form oligomeric complexes on the origin of DNA replication (ori). These complexes carry out a multitude of functions related to initiation of DNA replication, and although many of these functions have been characterized biochemically, little is understood about how the complexes are assembled. Here we demonstrate that loss of one particular interaction, the dimerization between E1 DNA binding domains, has a severe effect on DNA replication in vivo but has surprisingly modest effects on most individual biochemical activities in vitro. We conclude that the dimer interaction is primarily required for initial recognition of ori.

N-terminal DNA-binding domains contribute to differential DNA-binding specificities of NF-kappa B p50 and p65

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 852-860
Author(s):  
M B Toledano ◽  
D Ghosh ◽  
F Trinh ◽  
W J Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Sequence Motif ◽  
Structural Determinants ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity

We previously reported that either oxidation or alkylation of NF-kappa B in vitro abrogates DNA binding. We used this phenomenon to help elucidate structural determinants of NF-kappa B binding. We now demonstrate that Cys-62 of NF-kappa B p50 mediates the redox effect and lies within an N-terminal region required for DNA binding but not for dimerization. Several point mutations in this region confer a transdominant negative binding phenotype to p50. The region is highly conserved in all Rel family proteins, and we have determined that it is also critical for DNA binding of NF-kappa B p65. Replacement of the N-terminal region of p65 with the corresponding region from p50 changes its DNA-binding specificity towards that of p50. These data suggest that the N-terminal regions of p50 and p65 are critical for DNA binding and help determine the DNA-binding specificities of p50 and p65. We have defined within the N-terminal region a sequence motif, R(F/G)(R/K)YXCE, which is present in Rel family proteins and also in zinc finger proteins capable of binding to kappa B sites. The potential significance of this finding is discussed.

scholarly journals Fused protein domains inhibit DNA binding by LexA.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 3006-3014 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Golemis ◽  
R Brent
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Dimerization Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Operator Binding

Many studies of transcription activation employ fusions of activation domains to DNA binding domains derived from the bacterial repressor LexA and the yeast activator GAL4. Such studies often implicitly assume that DNA binding by the chimeric proteins is equivalent to that of the protein donating the DNA binding moiety. To directly investigate this issue, we compared operator binding by a series of LexA-derivative proteins to operator binding by native LexA, by using both in vivo and in vitro assays. We show that operator binding by many proteins such as LexA-Myc, LexA-Fos, and LexA-Bicoid is severely impaired, while binding of other LexA-derivative proteins, such as those that carry bacterially encoded acidic sequences ("acid blobs"), is not. Our results also show that DNA binding by LexA derivatives that contain the LexA carboxy-terminal dimerization domain (amino acids 88 to 202) is considerably stronger than binding by fusions that lack it and that heterologous dimerization motifs cannot substitute for the LexA88-202 function. These results suggest the need to reevaluate some previous studies of activation that employed LexA derivatives and modifications to recent experimental approaches that use LexA and GAL4 derivatives to detect and study protein-protein interactions.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase II transcription factors H4TF-1 and H4TF-2 require metal to bind specific DNA sequences.

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 4582-4584 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Dailey ◽  
S B Roberts ◽  
N Heintz
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Chelating Agents ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription

Specific DNA-binding and in vitro transcription activities of H4TF-1 and H4TF-2 are inactivated by chelating agents. Binding activity is restored by addition of Zn2+, and H4TF-2 is also reactivated by Fe2+. In contrast, preformed factor-DNA complexes are resistant to chelators. Therefore, metal ions are a required component of the H4TF-1 and H4TF-2 DNA-binding domains.

scholarly journals The PAX3-FKHR fusion protein created by the t(2;13) translocation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas is a more potent transcriptional activator than PAX3.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1522-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
W J Fredericks ◽  
N Galili ◽  
S Mukhopadhyay ◽  
G Rovera ◽  
J Bennicelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Polypeptide

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas are pediatric solid tumors with a hallmark cytogenetic abnormality: translocation of chromosomes 2 and 13 [t(2;13) (q35;q14)]. The genes on each chromosome involved in this translocation have been identified as the transcription factor-encoding genes PAX3 and FKHR. The NH2-terminal paired box and homeodomain DNA-binding domains of PAX3 are fused in frame to COOH-terminal regions of the chromosome 13-derived FKHR gene, a novel member of the forkhead DNA-binding domain family. To determine the role of the fusion protein in transcriptional regulation and oncogenesis, we identified the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein and characterized its function(s) as a transcription factor relative to wild-type PAX3. Antisera specific to PAX3 and FKHR were developed and used to examine PAX3 and PAX3-FKHR expression in tumor cell lines. Sequential immunoprecipitations with anti-PAX3 and anti-FKHR sera demonstrated expression of a 97-kDa PAX3-FKHR fusion protein in the t(2;13)-positive rhabdomyosarcoma Rh30 cell line and verified that a single polypeptide contains epitopes derived from each protein. The PAX3-FKHR protein was localized to the nucleus in Rh30 cells, as was wild-type PAX3, in t(2;13)-negative A673 cells. In gel shift assays using a canonical PAX binding site (e5 sequence), we found that DNA binding of PAX3-FKHR was significantly impaired relative to that of PAX3 despite the two proteins having identical PAX DNA-binding domains. However, the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein was a much more potent transcriptional activator than PAX3 as determined by transient cotransfection assays using e5-CAT reporter plasmids. The PAX3-FKHR protein may function as an oncogenic transcription factor by enhanced activation of normal PAX3 target genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document