scholarly journals Individual Variation in Brain Network Topology Predicts Emotional Intelligence

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling George ◽  
Lee Ivy ◽  
Guimond Synthia ◽  
Lutz Olivia ◽  
Tandon Neeraj ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundSocial cognitive ability is a significant determinant of functional outcome and deficits in social cognition are a disabling symptom of psychotic disorders. The neurobiological underpinnings of social cognition are not well understood, hampering our ability to ameliorate these deficits.ObjectiveUsing ‘resting-state’ fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) and a trans-diagnostic, data-driven analytic strategy, we sought to identify the brain network basis of emotional intelligence, a key domain of social cognition.MethodsStudy participants included 60 participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 46 healthy comparison participants. All participants underwent a resting-state fMRI scan. Emotional Intelligence was measured using the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). A connectome-wide analysis of brain connectivity examined how each individual brain voxel’s connectivity correlated with emotional intelligence using multivariate distance matrix regression (MDMR).ResultsWe identified a region in the left superior parietal lobule (SPL) where individual network topology predicted emotional intelligence. Specifically, the association of this region with the Default Mode Network predicted higher emotional intelligence and association with the Dorsal Attention Network predicted lower emotional intelligence. This correlation was observed in both schizophrenia and healthy comparison participants.ConclusionPrevious studies have demonstrated individual variance in brain network topology but the cognitive or behavioral relevance of these differences was undetermined. We observe that the left SPL, a region of high individual variance at the cytoarchitectonic level, also demonstrates individual variance in its association with large scale brain networks and that network topology predicts emotional intelligence.

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 3677-3686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueling Suo ◽  
Du Lei ◽  
Kaiming Li ◽  
Fuqin Chen ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 862-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lubin Wang ◽  
Qiang Liu ◽  
Hui Shen ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Dewen Hu

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 102333
Author(s):  
Tomas P. Labbe ◽  
Mariana Zurita ◽  
Cristian Montalba ◽  
Ethel L. Ciampi ◽  
Juan P. Cruz ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mite Mijalkov ◽  
Ehsan Kakaei ◽  
Joana B. Pereira ◽  
Eric Westman ◽  
Giovanni Volpe ◽  
...  

AbstractThe brain is a large-scale complex network whose workings rely on the interaction between its various regions. In the past few years, the organization of the human brain network has been studied extensively using concepts from graph theory, where the brain is represented as a set of nodes connected by edges. This representation of the brain as a connectome can be used to assess important measures that reflect its topological architecture. We have developed a freeware MatLab-based software (BRAPH – BRain Analysis using graPH theory) for connectivity analysis of brain networks derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and electroencephalogram (EEG) data. BRAPH allows building connectivity matrices, calculating global and local network measures, performing non-parametric permutations for group comparisons, assessing the modules in the network, and comparing the results to random networks. By contrast to other toolboxes, it allows performing longitudinal comparisons of the same patients across different points in time. Furthermore, even though a user-friendly interface is provided, the architecture of the program is modular (object-oriented) so that it can be easily expanded and customized. To demonstrate the abilities of BRAPH, we performed structural and functional graph theory analyses in two separate studies. In the first study, using MRI data, we assessed the differences in global and nodal network topology in healthy controls, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. In the second study, using resting-state fMRI data, we compared healthy controls and Parkinson’s patients with mild cognitive impairment.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moumita Das ◽  
Vanshika Singh ◽  
Lucina Q Uddin ◽  
Arpan Banerjee ◽  
Dipanjan Roy

Abstract A complete picture of how subcortical nodes, such as the thalamus, exert directional influence on large-scale brain network interactions across age remains elusive. Using directed functional connectivity and weighted net causal outflow on resting-state fMRI data, we provide evidence of a comprehensive reorganization within and between neurocognitive networks (default mode: DMN, salience: SN, and central executive: CEN) associated with age and thalamocortical interactions. We hypothesize that thalamus subserves both modality-specific and integrative hub role in organizing causal weighted outflow among large-scale neurocognitive networks. To this end, we observe that within-network directed functional connectivity is driven by thalamus and progressively weakens with age. Secondly, we find that age-associated increase in between CEN- and DMN-directed functional connectivity is driven by both the SN and the thalamus. Furthermore, left and right thalami act as a causal integrative hub exhibiting substantial interactions with neurocognitive networks with aging and play a crucial role in reconfiguring network outflow. Notably, these results were largely replicated on an independent dataset of matched young and old individuals. Our findings strengthen the hypothesis that the thalamus is a key causal hub balancing both within- and between-network connectivity associated with age and maintenance of cognitive functioning with aging.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhonglin Li ◽  
Rui Chen ◽  
Min Guan ◽  
Enfeng Wang ◽  
Tianyi Qian ◽  
...  

Neuroscience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 425 ◽  
pp. 169-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuewei Wang ◽  
Ru Wang ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Qiang Lin ◽  
Xiaohu Zhao ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ann Hadley ◽  
Nina Vanessa Kraguljac ◽  
David Matthew White ◽  
Lawrence Ver Hoef ◽  
Janell Tabora ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document