scholarly journals High carnivore population density highlights the conservation value of industrialised sites

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daan J. E. Loock ◽  
Samual T. Williams ◽  
Kevin W. Emslie ◽  
Wayne S. Matthews ◽  
Lourens H. Swanepoel
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Population Density ◽  
Human Development ◽  
Camera Trap ◽  
High Abundance ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Conservation Value ◽  
Industrial Sites ◽  
Capture Recapture ◽  
Disturbed Habitats

AbstractAs the environment becomes increasingly altered by human development, the importance of understanding the ways in which wildlife interact with modified landscapes is becoming clear. Areas such as industrial sites are sometimes presumed to have little conservation value, but many of these sites have areas of less disturbed habitats around their core infrastructure, which could provide ideal conditions to support some species, such as mesocarnivores. We conducted the first assessments of the density of serval (Leptailurus serval) at the Secunda Synfuels Operations plant, South Africa. We ran three camera trap surveys to estimate serval density using a spatially explicit capture recapture framework. Servals occurred at densities of 76.20-101.21 animals per 100 km2, which are the highest recorded densities for this species, presumably due to high abundance of prey and the absence of persecution and/or competitor species. Our findings highlight the significant conservation potential of industrialised sites, and we suggest that such sites could help contribute towards meeting conservation goals.

scholarly journals Estimating leopard density across the highly modified human-dominated landscape of the Western Cape, South Africa

Oryx ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn H. Devens ◽  
Matt W. Hayward ◽  
Thulani Tshabalala ◽  
Amy Dickman ◽  
Jeannine S. McManus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Habitat Degradation ◽  
Land Use Changes ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Camera Trap ◽  
Anthropogenic Factors ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Western Cape ◽  
Apex Predators ◽  
Capture Recapture

Abstract Apex predators play a critical role in maintaining the health of ecosystems but are highly susceptible to habitat degradation and loss caused by land-use changes, and to anthropogenic mortality. The leopard Panthera pardus is the last free-roaming large carnivore in the Western Cape province, South Africa. During 2011–2015, we carried out a camera-trap survey across three regions covering c. 30,000 km2 of the Western Cape. Our survey comprised 151 camera sites sampling nearly 14,000 camera-trap nights, resulting in the identification of 71 individuals. We used two spatially explicit capture–recapture methods (R programmes secr and SPACECAP) to provide a comprehensive density analysis capable of incorporating environmental and anthropogenic factors. Leopard density was estimated to be 0.35 and 1.18 leopards/100 km2, using secr and SPACECAP, respectively. Leopard population size was predicted to be 102–345 individuals for our three study regions. With these estimates and the predicted available leopard habitat for the province, we extrapolated that the Western Cape supports an estimated 175–588 individuals. Providing a comprehensive baseline population density estimate is critical to understanding population dynamics across a mixed landscape and helping to determine the most appropriate conservation actions. Spatially explicit capture–recapture methods are unbiased by edge effects and superior to traditional capture–mark–recapture methods when estimating animal densities. We therefore recommend further utilization of robust spatial methods as they continue to be advanced.

scholarly journals Do conservation strategies that increase tiger populations have consequences for other wild carnivores like leopards?

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujjwal Kumar ◽  
Neha Awasthi ◽  
Qamar Qureshi ◽  
Yadvendradev Jhala
Keyword(s):  
Species Conservation ◽  
Camera Trap ◽  
Conservation Strategies ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Large Carnivores ◽  
Catchment Scale ◽  
Large Carnivore ◽  
Positive Growth ◽  
Capture Recapture ◽  
Very High

Abstract Most large carnivore populations are declining across their global range except in some well managed protected areas (PA’s). Investments for conserving charismatic apex carnivores are often justified due to their umbrella effect on biodiversity. We evaluate population trends of two large sympatric carnivores, the tiger and leopard through spatially-explicit-capture-recapture models from camera trap data in Kanha PA, India, from 2011 to 2016. Our results show that the overall density (100 km−2) of tigers ranged between 4.82 ± 0.33 to 5.21 ± 0.55SE and of leopards between 6.63 ± 0.71 to 8.64 ± 0.75SE, with no detectable trends at the PA scale. When evaluated at the catchment scale, Banjar catchment that had higher prey density and higher conservation investments, recorded significant growth of both carnivores. While Halon catchment, that had lower prey and conservation investments, populations of both carnivores remained stable. Sex ratio of both carnivores was female biased. As is typical with large carnivores, movement parameter sigma (an index for range size), was larger for males than for females. However, sigma was surprisingly similar for the same genders in both carnivores. At home-range scale, leopards achieved high densities and positive growth rates in areas that had low, medium or declining tiger density. Our results suggest that umbrella-species conservation value of tigers is likely to be compromised at very high densities and therefore should not be artificially inflated through targeted management.

scholarly journals Assumptions about fence permeability influence density estimates for brown hyaenas across South Africa

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn S. Williams ◽  
Samual T. Williams ◽  
Rebecca J. Welch ◽  
Courtney J. Marneweck ◽  
Gareth K. H. Mann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Population Density ◽  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Management Decisions ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Dominant Feature ◽  
Capture Recapture ◽  
Number Of Individuals ◽  
Density Results

AbstractWildlife population density estimates provide information on the number of individuals in an area and influence conservation management decisions. Thus, accuracy is vital. A dominant feature in many landscapes globally is fencing, yet the implications of fence permeability on density estimation using spatial capture-recapture modelling are seldom considered. We used camera trap data from 15 fenced reserves across South Africa to examine the density of brown hyaenas (Parahyaena brunnea). We estimated density and modelled its relationship with a suite of covariates when fenced reserve boundaries were assumed to be permeable or impermeable to hyaena movements. The best performing models were those that included only the influence of study site on both hyaena density and detection probability, regardless of assumptions of fence permeability. When fences were considered impermeable, densities ranged from 2.55 to 15.06 animals per 100 km2, but when fences were considered permeable, density estimates were on average 9.52 times lower (from 0.17 to 1.59 animals per 100 km2). Fence permeability should therefore be an essential consideration when estimating density, especially since density results can considerably influence wildlife management decisions. In the absence of strong evidence to the contrary, future studies in fenced areas should assume some degree of permeability in order to avoid overestimating population density.

scholarly journals A spatially explicit approach for estimating space use and density of common genets

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33
Author(s):  
P. Sarmento ◽  
◽  
J. Cruz ◽  
C. Eira ◽  
C. Fonseca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Model ◽  
Environmental Variables ◽  
Camera Trap ◽  
Grid Size ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Closed Population ◽  
Abundance Estimates ◽  
Capture Recapture

Many species that occur at low densities are not accurately estimated using capture–recapture methods as such techniques assume that populations are well–defined in space. To solve this bias, spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) models have recently been developed. These models incorporate movement and can identify areas where it is more likely for individuals to concentrate their activity. In this study, we used data from camera–trap surveys of common genets (Genetta genetta) in Serra da Malcata (Portugal), designed to compare abundance estimates produced by SECR models with traditional closed–capture models. Using the SECR models, we observed spatial heterogeneity in genet distribution and density estimates were approximately two times lower than those obtained from the closed population models. The non–spatial model estimates were constrained to sampling grid size and likely underestimated movements, thereby overestimating density. Future research should consider the incorporation of cost–weighed models that can include explicit hypothesis on how environmental variables influence the distance metric.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document