scholarly journals From prior information to saccade selection: evolution of frontal eye field activity during natural scene search

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I. Glaser ◽  
Daniel K. Wood ◽  
Patrick N. Lawlor ◽  
Mark A. Segraves ◽  
Konrad P. Kording
Keyword(s):  
Prior Information ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Natural Scenes ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Influence Activity

AbstractPrior knowledge about our environment influences our actions. How does this knowledge evolve into a final action plan and how does the brain represent this? Here, we investigated this question in the monkey oculomotor system during self-guided search of natural scenes. In the frontal eye field (FEF), we found a subset of neurons, “early neurons,” that contain information about the upcoming saccade long before it is executed, often before the previous saccade had even ended. Crucially, much of this early information did not relate to the actual saccade that would eventually be selected. Rather, it related to prior information about the probabilities of possible upcoming saccades based on the pre-saccade fixation location. Nearer to the time of saccade onset, a greater proportion of these neurons’ activities related to the saccade selection, although prior information continued to influence activity throughout. A separate subset of FEF neurons, “late neurons”, only represented the final action plan near saccade onset and not prior information. Our results demonstrate how, across the population of FEF neurons, prior information evolves into definitive saccade plans.

scholarly journals From Prior Information to Saccade Selection: Evolution of Frontal Eye Field Activity during Natural Scene Search

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1957-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I Glaser ◽  
Daniel K Wood ◽  
Patrick N Lawlor ◽  
Mark A Segraves ◽  
Konrad P Kording
Keyword(s):  
Prior Information ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Natural Scenes ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Influence Activity

Abstract Prior knowledge about our environment influences our actions. How does this knowledge evolve into a final action plan and how does the brain represent this? Here, we investigated this question in the monkey oculomotor system during self-guided search of natural scenes. In the frontal eye field (FEF), we found a subset of neurons, “Early neurons,” that contain information about the upcoming saccade long before it is executed, often before the previous saccade had even ended. Crucially, much of this early information did not relate to the actual saccade that would eventually be selected. Rather, it related to prior information about the probabilities of possible upcoming saccades based on the presaccade fixation location. Nearer to the time of saccade onset, a greater proportion of these neurons’ activities related to the saccade selection, although prior information continued to influence activity throughout. A separate subset of FEF neurons, “Late neurons,” only represented the final action plan near saccade onset and not prior information. Our results demonstrate how, across the population of FEF neurons, prior information evolves into definitive saccade plans.

scholarly journals Neural correlates of goal-directed and non–goal-directed movements

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. e2006372118
Author(s):  
Naveen Sendhilnathan ◽  
Debaleena Basu ◽  
Michael E. Goldberg ◽  
Jeffrey D. Schall ◽  
Aditya Murthy
Keyword(s):  
Brain Area ◽  
Field Potential ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Voluntary Control ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Beta Band ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Saccade Direction ◽  
The Brain

What are the cortical neural correlates that distinguish goal-directed and non–goal-directed movements? We investigated this question in the monkey frontal eye field (FEF), which is implicated in voluntary control of saccades. Here, we compared FEF activity associated with goal-directed (G) saccades and non–goal-directed (nG) saccades made by the monkey. Although the FEF neurons discharged before these nG saccades, there were three major differences in the neural activity: First, the variability in spike rate across trials decreased only for G saccades. Second, the local field potential beta-band power decreased during G saccades but did not change during nG saccades. Third, the time from saccade direction selection to the saccade onset was significantly longer for G saccades compared with nG saccades. Overall, our results reveal unexpected differences in neural signatures for G versus nG saccades in a brain area that has been implicated selectively in voluntary control. Taken together, these data add critical constraints to the way we think about saccade generation in the brain.

Frontal eye field activity preceding aurally guided saccades

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 1250-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Russo ◽  
C. J. Bruce
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Location ◽  
Auditory Target ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
Movement Vector ◽  
Initial Fixation ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Movement Field ◽  
Visual Targets

1. We studied neuronal activity in the monkey's frontal eye field (FEF) in conjunction with saccades directed to auditory targets. 2. All FEF neurons with movement activity preceding saccades to visual targets also were active preceding saccades to auditory targets, even when such saccades were made in the dark. Movement cells generally had comparable bursts for aurally and visually guided saccades; visuomovement cells often had weaker bursts in conjunction with aurally guided saccades. 3. When these cells were tested from different initial fixation directions, movement fields associated with aurally guided saccades, like fields mapped with visual targets, were a function of saccade dimensions, and not the speaker's spatial location. Thus, even though sound location cues are chiefly craniotopic, the crucial factor for a FEF discharge before aurally guided saccades was the location of auditory target relative to the current direction of gaze. 4. Intracortical microstimulation at the sites of these cells evoked constant-vector saccades, and not goal-directed saccades. The direction and size of electrically elicited saccades generally matched the cell's movement field for aurally guided saccades. 5. Thus FEF activity appears to have a role in aurally guided as well as visually guided saccades. Moreover, visual and auditory target representations, although initially obtained in different coordinate systems, appear to converge to a common movement vector representation at the FEF stage of saccadic processing that is appropriate for transmittal to saccade-related burst neurons in the superior colliculus and pons.

scholarly journals What the Brain Stem Tells the Frontal Cortex. I. Oculomotor Signals Sent From Superior Colliculus to Frontal Eye Field Via Mediodorsal Thalamus

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 1381-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Sommer ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Frontal Cortex ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Signal Transmission ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Mediodorsal Thalamus ◽  
Visual Activity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
The Brain

Neuronal processing in cerebral cortex and signal transmission from cortex to brain stem have been studied extensively, but little is known about the numerous feedback pathways that ascend from brain stem to cortex. In this study, we characterized the signals conveyed through an ascending pathway coursing from the superior colliculus (SC) to the frontal eye field (FEF) via mediodorsal thalamus (MD). Using antidromic and orthodromic stimulation, we identified SC source neurons, MD relay neurons, and FEF recipient neurons of the pathway in Macaca mulatta. The monkeys performed oculomotor tasks, including delayed-saccade tasks, that permitted analysis of signals such as visual activity, delay activity, and presaccadic activity. We found that the SC sends all of these signals into the pathway with no output selectivity, i.e., the signals leaving the SC resembled those found generally within the SC. Visual activity arrived in FEF too late to contribute to short-latency visual responses there, and delay activity was largely filtered out in MD. Presaccadic activity, however, seemed critical because it traveled essentially unchanged from SC to FEF. Signal transmission in the pathway was fast (∼2 ms from SC to FEF) and topographically organized (SC neurons drove MD and FEF neurons having similarly eccentric visual and movement fields). Our analysis of identified neurons in one pathway from brain stem to frontal cortex thus demonstrates that multiple signals are sent from SC to FEF with presaccadic activity being prominent. We hypothesize that a major signal conveyed by the pathway is corollary discharge information about the vector of impending saccades.

scholarly journals Compression and Suppression of Shifting Receptive Field Activity in Frontal Eye Field Neurons

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (46) ◽  
pp. 18259-18269 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. Joiner ◽  
J. Cavanaugh ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field

Suppression of Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Monkey Frontal Eye Field. II. Suppression of Bilateral Saccades

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 2261-2273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Izawa ◽  
Hisao Suzuki ◽  
Yoshikazu Shinoda
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Neural Mechanism ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Pontine Reticular Formation ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Stimulation Of

To understand the neural mechanism of fixation, we investigated effects of electrical stimulation of the frontal eye field (FEF) and its vicinity on visually guided (Vsacs) and memory-guided saccades (Msacs) in trained monkeys and found that there were two types of suppression induced by the electrical stimulation: suppression of ipsilateral saccades and suppression of bilateral saccades. In this report, we characterized the properties of the suppression of bilateral Vsacs and Msacs. Stimulation of the bilateral suppression sites suppressed the initiation of both Vsacs and Msacs in all directions during and ∼50 ms after stimulation but did not affect the vector of these saccades. The suppression was stronger for ipsiversive larger saccades and contraversive smaller saccades, and saccades with initial eye positions shifted more in the saccadic direction. The most effective stimulation timing for the suppression of ipsilateral and contralateral Vsacs was ∼40–50 ms before saccade onset, indicating that the suppression occurred most likely in the superior colliculus and/or the paramedian pontine reticular formation. Suppression sites of bilateral saccades were located in the prearcuate gyrus facing the inferior arcuate sulcus where stimulation induced suppression at ≤40 μA but usually did not evoke any saccades at 80 μA and were different from those of ipsilateral saccades where stimulation evoked saccades at ≤50 μA. The bilateral suppression sites contained fixation neurons. The results suggest that fixation neurons in the bilateral suppression area of the FEF may play roles in maintaining fixation by suppressing saccades in all directions.

scholarly journals Integration of Eye-Centered and Landmark-Centered Codes in Frontal Eye Field Gaze Responses

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 4995-5013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Bharmauria ◽  
Amirsaman Sajad ◽  
Jirui Li ◽  
Xiaogang Yan ◽  
Hongying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Cortex ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Target Position ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Behavioral Experiments ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field

Abstract The visual system is thought to separate egocentric and allocentric representations, but behavioral experiments show that these codes are optimally integrated to influence goal-directed movements. To test if frontal cortex participates in this integration, we recorded primate frontal eye field activity during a cue-conflict memory delay saccade task. To dissociate egocentric and allocentric coordinates, we surreptitiously shifted a visual landmark during the delay period, causing saccades to deviate by 37% in the same direction. To assess the cellular mechanisms, we fit neural response fields against an egocentric (eye-centered target-to-gaze) continuum, and an allocentric shift (eye-to-landmark-centered) continuum. Initial visual responses best-fit target position. Motor responses (after the landmark shift) predicted future gaze position but embedded within the motor code was a 29% shift toward allocentric coordinates. This shift appeared transiently in memory-related visuomotor activity, and then reappeared in motor activity before saccades. Notably, fits along the egocentric and allocentric shift continua were initially independent, but became correlated across neurons just before the motor burst. Overall, these results implicate frontal cortex in the integration of egocentric and allocentric visual information for goal-directed action, and demonstrate the cell-specific, temporal progression of signal multiplexing for this process in the gaze system.

scholarly journals Difficulty of Visual Search Modulates Neuronal Interactions and Response Variability in the Frontal Eye Field

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 2580-2587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah Y. Cohen ◽  
Pierre Pouget ◽  
Geoffrey F. Woodman ◽  
Chenchal R. Subraveti ◽  
Jeffrey D. Schall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Visual Search ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Response Variability ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Neuronal Interactions ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Spiking Activity

The frontal eye field (FEF) is involved in selecting visual targets for eye movements. To understand how populations of FEF neurons interact during target selection, we recorded activity from multiple neurons simultaneously while macaques performed two versions of a visual search task. We used a multivariate analysis in a point process statistical framework to estimate the instantaneous firing rate and compare interactions among neurons between tasks. We found that FEF neurons were engaged in more interactions during easier visual search tasks compared with harder search tasks. In particular, eye movement–related neurons were involved in more interactions than visual-related neurons. In addition, our analysis revealed a decrease in the variability of spiking activity in the FEF beginning ∼100 ms before saccade onset. The minimum in response variability occurred ∼20 ms earlier for the easier search task compared with the harder one. This difference is positively correlated with the difference in saccade reaction times for the two tasks. These findings show that a multivariate analysis can provide a measure of neuronal interactions and characterize the spiking activity of FEF neurons in the context of a population of neurons.

scholarly journals Disrupting frontal eye-field activity impairs memory recall

Neuroreport ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 374-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Wantz ◽  
Corinna S. Martarelli ◽  
Dario Cazzoli ◽  
Roger Kalla ◽  
René Müri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Memory Recall ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document