scholarly journals Neural correlates of goal-directed and non–goal-directed movements

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. e2006372118
Author(s):  
Naveen Sendhilnathan ◽  
Debaleena Basu ◽  
Michael E. Goldberg ◽  
Jeffrey D. Schall ◽  
Aditya Murthy
Keyword(s):  
Brain Area ◽  
Field Potential ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Voluntary Control ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Beta Band ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Saccade Direction ◽  
The Brain

What are the cortical neural correlates that distinguish goal-directed and non–goal-directed movements? We investigated this question in the monkey frontal eye field (FEF), which is implicated in voluntary control of saccades. Here, we compared FEF activity associated with goal-directed (G) saccades and non–goal-directed (nG) saccades made by the monkey. Although the FEF neurons discharged before these nG saccades, there were three major differences in the neural activity: First, the variability in spike rate across trials decreased only for G saccades. Second, the local field potential beta-band power decreased during G saccades but did not change during nG saccades. Third, the time from saccade direction selection to the saccade onset was significantly longer for G saccades compared with nG saccades. Overall, our results reveal unexpected differences in neural signatures for G versus nG saccades in a brain area that has been implicated selectively in voluntary control. Taken together, these data add critical constraints to the way we think about saccade generation in the brain.

scholarly journals Neural correlates of goal-directed and non-goal-directed movements

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen Sendhilnathan ◽  
Debaleena Basu ◽  
Michael E. Goldberg ◽  
Jeffrey D. Schall ◽  
Aditya Murthy
Keyword(s):  
Neural Activity ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Spike Rate ◽  
Voluntary Control ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Beta Band ◽  
Band Power ◽  
Eye Field

AbstractWhat are the neural correlates that distinguish goal-directed (G) from non-goal-directed movements (nG)? We investigated this question in the monkey frontal eye field, which is implicated in voluntary control of saccades. We found that only for G-saccades, the variability in spike rate across trials decreased, the regularity of spike timings within trials increased, the neural activity increased earlier from baseline and had a concurrent reduction of LFP beta band power.

scholarly journals From Prior Information to Saccade Selection: Evolution of Frontal Eye Field Activity during Natural Scene Search

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1957-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I Glaser ◽  
Daniel K Wood ◽  
Patrick N Lawlor ◽  
Mark A Segraves ◽  
Konrad P Kording
Keyword(s):  
Prior Information ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Natural Scenes ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Influence Activity

Abstract Prior knowledge about our environment influences our actions. How does this knowledge evolve into a final action plan and how does the brain represent this? Here, we investigated this question in the monkey oculomotor system during self-guided search of natural scenes. In the frontal eye field (FEF), we found a subset of neurons, “Early neurons,” that contain information about the upcoming saccade long before it is executed, often before the previous saccade had even ended. Crucially, much of this early information did not relate to the actual saccade that would eventually be selected. Rather, it related to prior information about the probabilities of possible upcoming saccades based on the presaccade fixation location. Nearer to the time of saccade onset, a greater proportion of these neurons’ activities related to the saccade selection, although prior information continued to influence activity throughout. A separate subset of FEF neurons, “Late neurons,” only represented the final action plan near saccade onset and not prior information. Our results demonstrate how, across the population of FEF neurons, prior information evolves into definitive saccade plans.

scholarly journals From prior information to saccade selection: evolution of frontal eye field activity during natural scene search

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I. Glaser ◽  
Daniel K. Wood ◽  
Patrick N. Lawlor ◽  
Mark A. Segraves ◽  
Konrad P. Kording
Keyword(s):  
Prior Information ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Natural Scenes ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Field Activity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Influence Activity

AbstractPrior knowledge about our environment influences our actions. How does this knowledge evolve into a final action plan and how does the brain represent this? Here, we investigated this question in the monkey oculomotor system during self-guided search of natural scenes. In the frontal eye field (FEF), we found a subset of neurons, “early neurons,” that contain information about the upcoming saccade long before it is executed, often before the previous saccade had even ended. Crucially, much of this early information did not relate to the actual saccade that would eventually be selected. Rather, it related to prior information about the probabilities of possible upcoming saccades based on the pre-saccade fixation location. Nearer to the time of saccade onset, a greater proportion of these neurons’ activities related to the saccade selection, although prior information continued to influence activity throughout. A separate subset of FEF neurons, “late neurons”, only represented the final action plan near saccade onset and not prior information. Our results demonstrate how, across the population of FEF neurons, prior information evolves into definitive saccade plans.

scholarly journals Two subdivisions of macaque LIP process visual-oculomotor information differently

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (41) ◽  
pp. E6263-E6270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mo Chen ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Jing Guang ◽  
Linyu Wei ◽  
Si Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Field Potential ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Express Saccades ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Lateral Intraparietal Cortex ◽  
Persistent Memory ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Saccade Task

Although the cerebral cortex is thought to be composed of functionally distinct areas, the actual parcellation of area and assignment of function are still highly controversial. An example is the much-studied lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP). Despite the general agreement that LIP plays an important role in visual-oculomotor transformation, it remains unclear whether the area is primary sensory- or motor-related (the attention-intention debate). Although LIP has been considered as a functionally unitary area, its dorsal (LIPd) and ventral (LIPv) parts differ in local morphology and long-distance connectivity. In particular, LIPv has much stronger connections with two oculomotor centers, the frontal eye field and the deep layers of the superior colliculus, than does LIPd. Such anatomical distinctions imply that compared with LIPd, LIPv might be more involved in oculomotor processing. We tested this hypothesis physiologically with a memory saccade task and a gap saccade task. We found that LIP neurons with persistent memory activities in memory saccade are primarily provoked either by visual stimulation (vision-related) or by both visual and saccadic events (vision-saccade–related) in gap saccade. The distribution changes from predominantly vision-related to predominantly vision-saccade–related as the recording depth increases along the dorsal-ventral dimension. Consistently, the simultaneously recorded local field potential also changes from visual evoked to saccade evoked. Finally, local injection of muscimol (GABA agonist) in LIPv, but not in LIPd, dramatically decreases the proportion of express saccades. With these results, we conclude that LIPd and LIPv are more involved in visual and visual-saccadic processing, respectively.

scholarly journals What the Brain Stem Tells the Frontal Cortex. I. Oculomotor Signals Sent From Superior Colliculus to Frontal Eye Field Via Mediodorsal Thalamus

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 1381-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Sommer ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Frontal Cortex ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Signal Transmission ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Mediodorsal Thalamus ◽  
Visual Activity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
The Brain

Neuronal processing in cerebral cortex and signal transmission from cortex to brain stem have been studied extensively, but little is known about the numerous feedback pathways that ascend from brain stem to cortex. In this study, we characterized the signals conveyed through an ascending pathway coursing from the superior colliculus (SC) to the frontal eye field (FEF) via mediodorsal thalamus (MD). Using antidromic and orthodromic stimulation, we identified SC source neurons, MD relay neurons, and FEF recipient neurons of the pathway in Macaca mulatta. The monkeys performed oculomotor tasks, including delayed-saccade tasks, that permitted analysis of signals such as visual activity, delay activity, and presaccadic activity. We found that the SC sends all of these signals into the pathway with no output selectivity, i.e., the signals leaving the SC resembled those found generally within the SC. Visual activity arrived in FEF too late to contribute to short-latency visual responses there, and delay activity was largely filtered out in MD. Presaccadic activity, however, seemed critical because it traveled essentially unchanged from SC to FEF. Signal transmission in the pathway was fast (∼2 ms from SC to FEF) and topographically organized (SC neurons drove MD and FEF neurons having similarly eccentric visual and movement fields). Our analysis of identified neurons in one pathway from brain stem to frontal cortex thus demonstrates that multiple signals are sent from SC to FEF with presaccadic activity being prominent. We hypothesize that a major signal conveyed by the pathway is corollary discharge information about the vector of impending saccades.

scholarly journals Neural Correlates of Correct and Errant Attentional Selection Revealed Through N2pc and Frontal Eye Field Activity

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 2433-2441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Heitz ◽  
Jeremiah Y. Cohen ◽  
Geoffrey F. Woodman ◽  
Jeffrey D. Schall
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Covert Attention ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Eye Field

The goal of this study was to obtain a better understanding of the physiological basis of errors of visual search. Previous research has shown that search errors occur when visual neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) treat distractors as if they were targets. We replicated this finding during an inefficient form search and extended it by measuring simultaneously a macaque homologue of an event-related potential indexing the allocation of covert attention known as the m-N2pc. Based on recent work, we expected errors of selection in FEF to propagate to areas of extrastriate cortex responsible for allocating attention and implicated in the generation of the m-N2pc. Consistent with this prediction, we discovered that when FEF neurons selected a distractor instead of the search target, the m-N2pc shifted in the same, incorrect direction prior to the erroneous saccade. This suggests that such errors are due to a systematic misorienting of attention from the initial stages of visual processing. Our analyses also revealed distinct neural correlates of false alarms and guesses. These results demonstrate that errant gaze shifts during visual search arise from errant attentional processing.

scholarly journals Information theoretic evidence for predictive coding in the face processing system

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alla Brodski-Guerniero ◽  
Georg-Friedrich Paasch ◽  
Patricia Wollstadt ◽  
Ipek Özdemir ◽  
Joseph T. Lizier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prior Knowledge ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Brain Area ◽  
Predictive Coding ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Processing System ◽  
Information Storage ◽  
Beta Band ◽  
The Brain

AbstractPredictive coding suggests that the brain infers the causes of its sensations by combining sensory evidence with internal predictions based on available prior knowledge. However, the neurophysiological correlates of (pre-)activated prior knowledge serving these predictions are still unknown. Based on the idea that such pre-activated prior knowledge must be maintained until needed we measured the amount of maintained information in neural signals via the active information storage (AIS) measure. AIS was calculated on whole-brain beamformer-reconstructed source time-courses from magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings of 52 human subjects during the baseline of a Mooney face/house detection task. Pre-activation of prior knowledge for faces showed as alpha- and beta-band related AIS increases in content specific areas; these AIS increases were behaviourally relevant in brain area FFA. Further, AIS allowed decoding of the cued category on a trial-by-trial basis. Moreover, top-down transfer of predictions estimated by transfer entropy was associated with beta frequencies. Our results support accounts that activated prior knowledge and the corresponding predictions are signalled in low-frequency activity (<30 Hz).Significance statementOur perception is not only determined by the information our eyes/retina and other sensory organs receive from the outside world, but strongly depends also on information already present in our brains like prior knowledge about specific situations or objects. A currently popular theory in neuroscience, predictive coding theory, suggests that this prior knowledge is used by the brain to form internal predictions about upcoming sensory information. However, neurophysiological evidence for this hypothesis is rare – mostly because this kind of evidence requires making strong a-priori assumptions about the specific predictions the brain makes and the brain areas involved. Using a novel, assumption-free approach we find that face-related prior knowledge and the derived predictions are represented and transferred in low-frequency brain activity.

Suppression of Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Monkey Frontal Eye Field. II. Suppression of Bilateral Saccades

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 2261-2273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Izawa ◽  
Hisao Suzuki ◽  
Yoshikazu Shinoda
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Neural Mechanism ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Pontine Reticular Formation ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Stimulation Of

To understand the neural mechanism of fixation, we investigated effects of electrical stimulation of the frontal eye field (FEF) and its vicinity on visually guided (Vsacs) and memory-guided saccades (Msacs) in trained monkeys and found that there were two types of suppression induced by the electrical stimulation: suppression of ipsilateral saccades and suppression of bilateral saccades. In this report, we characterized the properties of the suppression of bilateral Vsacs and Msacs. Stimulation of the bilateral suppression sites suppressed the initiation of both Vsacs and Msacs in all directions during and ∼50 ms after stimulation but did not affect the vector of these saccades. The suppression was stronger for ipsiversive larger saccades and contraversive smaller saccades, and saccades with initial eye positions shifted more in the saccadic direction. The most effective stimulation timing for the suppression of ipsilateral and contralateral Vsacs was ∼40–50 ms before saccade onset, indicating that the suppression occurred most likely in the superior colliculus and/or the paramedian pontine reticular formation. Suppression sites of bilateral saccades were located in the prearcuate gyrus facing the inferior arcuate sulcus where stimulation induced suppression at ≤40 μA but usually did not evoke any saccades at 80 μA and were different from those of ipsilateral saccades where stimulation evoked saccades at ≤50 μA. The bilateral suppression sites contained fixation neurons. The results suggest that fixation neurons in the bilateral suppression area of the FEF may play roles in maintaining fixation by suppressing saccades in all directions.

scholarly journals Difficulty of Visual Search Modulates Neuronal Interactions and Response Variability in the Frontal Eye Field

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 2580-2587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah Y. Cohen ◽  
Pierre Pouget ◽  
Geoffrey F. Woodman ◽  
Chenchal R. Subraveti ◽  
Jeffrey D. Schall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Visual Search ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Response Variability ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Neuronal Interactions ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Spiking Activity

The frontal eye field (FEF) is involved in selecting visual targets for eye movements. To understand how populations of FEF neurons interact during target selection, we recorded activity from multiple neurons simultaneously while macaques performed two versions of a visual search task. We used a multivariate analysis in a point process statistical framework to estimate the instantaneous firing rate and compare interactions among neurons between tasks. We found that FEF neurons were engaged in more interactions during easier visual search tasks compared with harder search tasks. In particular, eye movement–related neurons were involved in more interactions than visual-related neurons. In addition, our analysis revealed a decrease in the variability of spiking activity in the FEF beginning ∼100 ms before saccade onset. The minimum in response variability occurred ∼20 ms earlier for the easier search task compared with the harder one. This difference is positively correlated with the difference in saccade reaction times for the two tasks. These findings show that a multivariate analysis can provide a measure of neuronal interactions and characterize the spiking activity of FEF neurons in the context of a population of neurons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document