scholarly journals Multiple Linear Regression: Bayesian Inference for Distributed and Big Data in the Medical Informatics Platform of the Human Brain Project

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester Melie-Garcia ◽  
Bogdan Draganski ◽  
John Ashburner ◽  
Ferath Kherif

ABSTRACTWe propose a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) methodology for the analysis of distributed and Big Data in the framework of the Medical Informatics Platform (MIP) of the Human Brain Project (HBP). MLR is a very versatile model, and is considered one of the workhorses for estimating dependences between clinical, neuropsychological and neurophysiological variables in the field of neuroimaging. One of the main concepts behind MIP is to federate data, which is stored locally in geographically distributed sites (hospitals, customized databases, etc.) around the world. We restrain from using a unique federation node for two main reasons: first the maintenance of data privacy, and second the efficiency in management of big volumes of data in terms of latency and storage resources needed in the federation node. Considering these conditions and the distributed nature of data, MLR cannot be estimated in the classical way, which raises the necessity of modifications of the standard algorithms. We use the Bayesian formalism that provides the armamentarium necessary to implement the MLR methodology for distributed Big Data. It allows us to account for the heterogeneity of the possible mechanisms that explain data sets across sites expressed through different models of explanatory variables. This approach enables the integration of highly heterogeneous data coming from different subjects and hospitals across the globe. Additionally, it offers general and sophisticated ways, which are extendable to other statistical models, to suit high-dimensional and distributed multimodal data. This work forms part of a series of papers related to the methodological developments embedded in the MIP.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristia M. Pavlakos

Big Data1is a phenomenon that has been increasingly studied in the academy in recent years, especially in technological and scientific contexts. However, it is still a relatively new field of academic study; because it has been previously considered in mainly technological contexts, more attention needs to be drawn to the contributions made in Big Data scholarship in the social sciences by scholars like Omar Tene and Jules Polonetsky, Bart Custers, Kate Crawford, Nick Couldry, and Jose van Dijk. The purpose of this Major Research Paper is to gain insight into the issues surrounding privacy and user rights, roles, and commodification in relation to Big Data in a social sciences context. The term “Big Data” describes the collection, aggregation, and analysis of large data sets. While corporations are usually responsible for the analysis and dissemination of the data, most of this data is user generated, and there must be considerations regarding the user’s rights and roles. In this paper, I raise three main issues that shape the discussion: how users can be more active agents in data ownership, how consent measures can be made to actively reflect user interests instead of focusing on benefitting corporations, and how user agency can be preserved. Through an analysis of social sciences scholarly literature on Big Data, privacy, and user commodification, I wish to determine how these concepts are being discussed, where there have been advancements in privacy regulation and the prevention of user commodification, and where there is a need to improve these measures. In doing this, I hope to discover a way to better facilitate the relationship between data collectors and analysts, and user-generators. 1 While there is no definitive resolution as to whether or not to capitalize the term “Big Data”, in capitalizing it I chose to conform with such authors as boyd and Crawford (2012), Couldry and Turow (2014), and Dalton and Thatcher (2015), who do so in the scholarly literature.


Web Services ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 314-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sema A. Kalaian ◽  
Rafa M. Kasim ◽  
Nabeel R. Kasim

Data analytics and modeling are powerful analytical tools for knowledge discovery through examining and capturing the complex and hidden relationships and patterns among the quantitative variables in the existing massive structured Big Data in efforts to predict future enterprise performance. The main purpose of this chapter is to present a conceptual and practical overview of some of the basic and advanced analytical tools for analyzing structured Big Data. The chapter covers descriptive and predictive analytical methods. Descriptive analytical tools such as mean, median, mode, variance, standard deviation, and data visualization methods (e.g., histograms, line charts) are covered. Predictive analytical tools for analyzing Big Data such as correlation, simple- and multiple- linear regression are also covered in the chapter.


Author(s):  
Saranya N. ◽  
Saravana Selvam

After an era of managing data collection difficulties, these days the issue has turned into the problem of how to process these vast amounts of information. Scientists, as well as researchers, think that today, probably the most essential topic in computing science is Big Data. Big Data is used to clarify the huge volume of data that could exist in any structure. This makes it difficult for standard controlling approaches for mining the best possible data through such large data sets. Classification in Big Data is a procedure of summing up data sets dependent on various examples. There are distinctive classification frameworks which help us to classify data collections. A few methods that discussed in the chapter are Multi-Layer Perception Linear Regression, C4.5, CART, J48, SVM, ID3, Random Forest, and KNN. The target of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of classification methods that are in effect commonly utilized.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Silvi Qemo ◽  
Eahab Elsaid

The purpose of this study is to derive a multiple linear regression model of the CAPM. More specifically, to test for other potential explanatory variables that can be added to the basic linear regression model for the expected returns on Apple Inc. The following explanatory variables were examined: share volume, outstanding shares, closing bid/ask spread, high/low spread and average spread. Using daily returns of Apple Inc. stock from 2007 till 2014 we were able to create a multiple linear regression model of CAPM that increase the R2 value from the basic linear regression model and enhances the amount of variability in the returns on an asset. This is an important modification that can help better forecast returns on assets.Keywords: CAPM; multiple linear regression model; average spread; variability in the returns


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristia M. Pavlakos

Big Data1is a phenomenon that has been increasingly studied in the academy in recent years, especially in technological and scientific contexts. However, it is still a relatively new field of academic study; because it has been previously considered in mainly technological contexts, more attention needs to be drawn to the contributions made in Big Data scholarship in the social sciences by scholars like Omar Tene and Jules Polonetsky, Bart Custers, Kate Crawford, Nick Couldry, and Jose van Dijk. The purpose of this Major Research Paper is to gain insight into the issues surrounding privacy and user rights, roles, and commodification in relation to Big Data in a social sciences context. The term “Big Data” describes the collection, aggregation, and analysis of large data sets. While corporations are usually responsible for the analysis and dissemination of the data, most of this data is user generated, and there must be considerations regarding the user’s rights and roles. In this paper, I raise three main issues that shape the discussion: how users can be more active agents in data ownership, how consent measures can be made to actively reflect user interests instead of focusing on benefitting corporations, and how user agency can be preserved. Through an analysis of social sciences scholarly literature on Big Data, privacy, and user commodification, I wish to determine how these concepts are being discussed, where there have been advancements in privacy regulation and the prevention of user commodification, and where there is a need to improve these measures. In doing this, I hope to discover a way to better facilitate the relationship between data collectors and analysts, and user-generators. 1 While there is no definitive resolution as to whether or not to capitalize the term “Big Data”, in capitalizing it I chose to conform with such authors as boyd and Crawford (2012), Couldry and Turow (2014), and Dalton and Thatcher (2015), who do so in the scholarly literature.


2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 439 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Manning ◽  
R. Manning ◽  
J. Boland ◽  
J. Boland

The aim of this preliminary experiment was to evaluate the effect of distance from the apiary on pod yield in canola. Beehives were used at a density of 1.28 hives/ha. The results showed that the number of pods/plant decreased as distance from the apiary increased, when plant height and branch number were used as explanatory variables. Multiple linear regression indicated a predicted pod loss of 15.3 pods/plant over a distance of 1000 m from an apiary. This was equivalent to a 16% loss based on an average of 59 plants/m2 and average pod production of 5666 pods/m2 from this experiment. For a 2 t/ha crop this would be equivalent to about 320 kg/ha. The results are only indicative because of the variation in the crop studied and lack of replication, but may, in fact, be a conservative estimate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arseny A. Sokolov ◽  
Thierry Phenix ◽  
Jérôme Chaptinel ◽  
Melanie Leroy ◽  
Ferath Kherif ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document