scholarly journals Hypermethylation of human DNA: Fine-tuning transcription associated with development

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Baribault ◽  
Kenneth C. Ehrlich ◽  
V. K. Chaithanya Ponnaluri ◽  
Sriharsa Pradhan ◽  
Michelle Lacey ◽  
...  

AbstractTissue-specific gene transcription can be affected by DNA methylation in ways that are difficult to discern from studies focused on genome-wide analyses of differentially methylated regions (DMRs). We studied 95 genes in detail using available epigenetic and transcription databases to detect and elucidate less obvious associations between development-linked hypermethylated DMRs in myoblasts (Mb) and cell-and tissue-specific expression. Many of these genes encode developmental transcription factors and display DNA hypermethylation also in skeletal muscle (SkM) and a few heterologous samples (e.g., aorta, mammary epithelial cells, or brain) among the 38 types of human cell cultures or tissues examined. Most of the DMRs overlapped transcription regulatory elements, including canonical, alternative, or cryptic promoters; enhancers; CTCF binding sites; and long-noncoding RNA (lncRNA) gene regions. Among the prominent relationships between DMRs and expression was promoter-region hypermethylation accompanying repression in Mb but not in many other repressed samples (26 genes). Another surprising relationship was down-modulated (but not silenced) expression in Mb associated with DNA hypermethylation at cryptic enhancers in Mb although such methylation was absent in both non-expressing samples and highly expressing samples (24 genes). The tissue-specificity of DNA hypermethylation can be explained for many of the genes by their roles in prenatal development or by the tissue-specific expression of neighboring genes. Besides elucidating developmental epigenetics, our study provides insights into the roles of abnormal DNA methylation in disease, e.g., cancer, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and congenital heart malformations.

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 3316-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Müller ◽  
Carol Readhead ◽  
Sven Diederichs ◽  
Gregory Idos ◽  
Rong Yang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Gene expression in mammalian organisms is regulated at multiple levels, including DNA accessibility for transcription factors and chromatin structure. Methylation of CpG dinucleotides is thought to be involved in imprinting and in the pathogenesis of cancer. However, the relevance of methylation for directing tissue-specific gene expression is highly controversial. The cyclin A1 gene is expressed in very few tissues, with high levels restricted to spermatogenesis and leukemic blasts. Here, we show that methylation of the CpG island of the human cyclin A1 promoter was correlated with nonexpression in cell lines, and the methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP2 suppressed transcription from the methylated cyclin A1 promoter. Repression could be relieved by trichostatin A. Silencing of a cyclin A1 promoter-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgene in stable transfected MG63 osteosarcoma cells was also closely associated with de novo promoter methylation. Cyclin A1 could be strongly induced in nonexpressing cell lines by trichostatin A but not by 5-aza-cytidine. The cyclin A1 promoter-EGFP construct directed tissue-specific expression in male germ cells of transgenic mice. Expression in the testes of these mice was independent of promoter methylation, and even strong promoter methylation did not suppress promoter activity. MeCP2 expression was notably absent in EGFP-expressing cells. Transcription from the transgenic cyclin A1 promoter was repressed in most organs outside the testis, even when the promoter was not methylated. These data show the association of methylation with silencing of the cyclin A1 gene in cancer cell lines. However, appropriate tissue-specific repression of the cyclin A1 promoter occurs independently of CpG methylation.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e67925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erling A. Hoivik ◽  
Solveig L. Witsoe ◽  
Inger R. Bergheim ◽  
Yunjian Xu ◽  
Ida Jakobsson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahashweta Basu ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Eytan Ruppin ◽  
Sridhar Hannenhalli

AbstractComplex diseases are systemic, largely mediated via transcriptional dysregulation in multiple tissues. Thus, knowledge of tissue-specific transcriptome in an individual can provide important information about an individual’s health. Unfortunately, with a few exceptions such as blood, skin, and muscle, an individual’s tissue-specific transcriptome is not accessible through non-invasive means. However, due to shared genetics and regulatory programs between tissues, the transcriptome in blood may be predictive of those in other tissues, at least to some extent. Here, based on GTEx data, we address this question in a rigorous, systematic manner, for the first time. We find that an individual’s whole blood gene expression and splicing profile can predict tissue-specific expression levels in a significant manner (beyond demographic variables) for many genes. On average, across 32 tissues, the expression of about 60% of the genes is predictable from blood expression in a significant manner, with a maximum of 81% of the genes for the musculoskeletal tissue. Remarkably, the tissue-specific expression inferred from the blood transcriptome is almost as good as the actual measured tissue expression in predicting disease state for six different complex disorders, including Hypertension and Type 2 diabetes, substantially surpassing predictors built directly from the blood transcriptome. The code for our pipeline for tissue-specific gene expression prediction – TEEBoT, is provided, enabling others to study its potential translational value in other indications.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 6296-6305
Author(s):  
I M Santoro ◽  
K Walsh

DNA elements with the CC(A/T)6GG, or CArG, motif occur in promoters that are under different regulatory controls. CArG elements from the skeletal actin, c-fos, and myogenin genes were tested for their abilities to confer tissue-specific expression on reporter genes when the individual elements were situated immediately upstream from a TATA element. The c-fos CArG element, also referred to as the serum response element (SRE), conferred basal, constitutive expression on the test promoter. The CArG motif from the myogenin gene was inactive. The skeletal actin CArG motif functioned as a muscle regulatory element (MRE) in that basal expression was detected only in muscle cultures. Muscle-specific expression from the 28-bp MRE and the 2.3-kb skeletal actin promoter was trans repressed by the Fos and Jun proteins. The expression and factor-binding properties of a series of synthetic CArG elements were analyzed. Muscle-specific expression was conferred by perfect 28-bp palindromes on the left and right halves of the skeletal actin MRE. Chimeric elements of the skeletal actin MRE and the c-fos SRE differed in their expression properties. Muscle-specific expression was observed when the left half of the MRE was fused to the right half of the SRE. Constitutive expression was conferred by a chimera with the right half of the MRE fused to the left half of the SRE and by chimeras which exchanged the central CC(A/T)6GG sequences. At least three distinct proteins specifically bound to these CArG elements. The natural and synthetic CArG elements differed in their affinities for these proteins; however, muscle-specific expression could not be attributed to differences in the binding of a single protein. Furthermore, the MRE did not bind MyoD or the myogenin-E12 heterodimer, indicating that muscle-specific expression from this element does not involve a direct interaction with these helix-loop-helix proteins. These data demonstrate that the conserved CArG motifs form the core of a family of functionally different DNA regulatory elements that may contribute to the tissue-specific expression properties of their cognate promoters.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 336-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Hayakawa ◽  
Momo O. Nakanishi ◽  
Jun Ohgane ◽  
Satoshi Tanaka ◽  
Mitsuko Hirosawa ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 202 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elika Missaghian ◽  
Petra Kempná ◽  
Bernhard Dick ◽  
Andrea Hirsch ◽  
Rasoul Alikhani-Koupaei ◽  
...  

The CYP17A1 gene is the qualitative regulator of steroidogenesis. Depending on the presence or absence of CYP17 activities mineralocorticoids, glucocorticoids or adrenal androgens are produced. The expression of the CYP17A1 gene is tissue as well as species-specific. In contrast to humans, adrenals of rodents do not express the CYP17A1 gene and have therefore no P450c17 enzyme for cortisol production, but produce corticosterone. DNA methylation is involved in the tissue-specific silencing of the CYP17A1 gene in human placental JEG-3 cells. We investigated the role of DNA methylation for the tissue-specific expression of the CYP17A1 gene in rodents. Rats treated with the methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-deoxycytidine excreted the cortisol metabolite tetrahydrocortisol in their urine suggesting that treatment induced CYP17 expression and 17α-hydroxylase activity through demethylation. Accordingly, bisulfite modification experiments identified a methylated CpG island in the CYP17 promoter in DNA extracted from rat adrenals but not from testes. Both methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors induced the expression of the CYP17A1 gene in mouse adrenocortical Y1 cells which normally do not express CYP17, indicating that the expression of the mouse CYP17A1 gene is epigenetically controlled. The role of DNA methylation for CYP17 expression was further underlined by the finding that a reporter construct driven by the mouse −1041 bp CYP17 promoter was active in Y1 cells, thus excluding the lack of essential transcription factors for CYP17 expression in these adrenal cells.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document