scholarly journals Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 456-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd A Blackledge ◽  
Chad M Eliason

Evolutionary conflict in trait performance under different ecological contexts is common, but may also arise from functional coupling between traits operating within the same context. Orb webs first intercept and then retain insects long enough to be attacked by spiders. Improving either function increases prey capture and they are largely determined by different aspects of web architecture. We manipulated the mesh width of orbs to investigate its effect, along with web size, on prey capture by spiders and found that they functioned independently. Probability of prey capture increased with web size but was not affected by mesh width. Conversely, spiders on narrow-meshed webs were almost three times more likely to capture energetically profitable large insects, which demand greater prey retention. Yet, the two functions are still constrained during web spinning because increasing mesh width maximizes web size and hence interception, while retention is improved by decreasing mesh width because more silk adheres to insects. The architectural coupling between prey interception and retention has probably played a key role in both the macroevolution of orb web shape and the expression of plasticity in the spinning behaviours of spiders.

2000 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 217 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Herberstein

Orb web spiders in the genus Argiope attach highly visible silk bands called decorations or stabilimenta to their webs. Two different hypotheses regarding the function of these structures were investigated in the field using Argiope keyserlingi: prey attraction and anti-predatory device. The first hypothesis suggests that web decorations attract prey to the web, and webs carrying decorations will capture more prey than those without. A field census of prey capture showed that webs adorned with more decorative bands indeed captured more but similarly sized prey per hour compared with webs carrying fewer decorations. Web height or web size, however, were not related to the rate of prey capture. This pattern was confirmed by a paired comparison of prey-capture rates within individuals that increased or decreased the number of decorative bands on consecutive days. Individuals that used more decorations also captured more prey compared with days when they spun fewer decorations. The second hypothesis suggests that these structures function as anti-predatory devices and, consequently, spiders on decorated webs benefit from a lower rate of mortality than spiders on undecorated webs. A census of the mortality rates of spiders over 19 days revealed that spiders did not disappear from undecorated webs more frequently than from decorated webs. Consequently, the idea that web decorations act as anti-predatory devices in A. keyserlingi was not supported.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan G. E. Gomes ◽  
Thomas Hesselberg ◽  
Jesse R. Barber

Author(s):  
Fernanda Carolina da Silva ◽  
Mateus Moleta ◽  
Camila Alves Dos Anjos ◽  
Gabriel Marra Schade ◽  
Gabriel Staichak ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline C. F. Grannemann ◽  
Marco Meyer ◽  
Marian Reinhardt ◽  
Martín J. Ramírez ◽  
Marie E. Herberstein ◽  
...  

AbstractSpiders are known for producing specialized fibers. The radial orb-web, for example, contains tough silk used for the web frame and the capture spiral consists of elastic silk, able to stretch when prey impacts the web. In concert, silk proteins and web geometry affects the spider’s ability to capture prey. Both factors have received considerable research attention, but next to no attention has been paid to the influence of fiber processing on web performance. Cribellate spiders produce a complex fiber alignment as their capture threads. With a temporally controlled spinneret movement, they connect different fibers at specific points to each other. One of the most complex capture threads is produced by the southern house spider, Kukulcania hibernalis (Filistatidae). In contrast to the so far characterized linear threads of other cribellate spiders, K. hibernalis spins capture threads in a zigzag pattern due to a slightly altered spinneret movement. The resulting more complex fiber alignment increased the thread’s overall ability to restrain prey, probably by increasing the adhesion area as well as its extensibility. Kukulcania hibernalis' cribellate silk perfectly illustrates the impact of small behavioral differences on the thread assembly and, thus, of silk functionality.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Penney ◽  
Vicente M Ortuño

The aerial orb web woven by spiders of the family Araneidae typifies these organisms to laypersons and scientists alike. Here we describe the oldest fossil species of this family, which is preserved in amber from Álava, Spain and represents the first record of Araneidae from the Lower Cretaceous. The fossils provide direct evidence that all three major orb web weaving families: Araneidae, Tetragnathidae and Uloboridae had evolved by this time, confirming the antiquity of the use of this remarkable structure as a prey capture strategy by spiders. Given the complex and stereotyped movements that all orb weavers use to construct their webs, there is little question regarding their common origin, which must have occurred in the Jurassic or earlier. Thus, various forms of this formidable prey capture mechanism were already in place by the time of the explosive Cretaceous co-radiation of angiosperms and their flying insect pollinators. This permitted a similar co-radiation of spider predators with their flying insect prey, presumably without the need for a ‘catch-up lag phase’ for the spiders.


1988 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Fowler ◽  
N. Gobbi

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (77) ◽  
pp. 3240-3248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Tarakanova ◽  
Markus J. Buehler

Among a myriad of spider web geometries, the orb web presents a fascinating, exquisite example in architecture and evolution. Orb webs can be divided into two categories according to the capture silk used in construction: cribellate orb webs (composed of pseudoflagelliform silk) coated with dry cribellate threads and ecribellate orb webs (composed of flagelliform silk fibres) coated by adhesive glue droplets. Cribellate capture silk is generally stronger but less-extensible than viscid capture silk, and a body of phylogenic evidence suggests that cribellate capture silk is more closely related to the ancestral form of capture spiral silk. Here, we use a coarse-grained web model to investigate how the mechanical properties of spiral capture silk affect the behaviour of the whole web, illustrating that more elastic capture spiral silk yields a decrease in web system energy absorption, suggesting that the function of the capture spiral shifted from prey capture to other structural roles. Additionally, we observe that in webs with more extensible capture silk, the effect of thread strength on web performance is reduced, indicating that thread elasticity is a dominant driving factor in web diversification.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzana Diniz ◽  
João Vasconcellos-Neto ◽  
Vanessa Stefani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document