scholarly journals eConsultations to Infectious Disease Specialists: Questions Asked and Impact on Primary Care Providers’ Behavior

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruchi Murthy ◽  
Gregory Rose ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Amir Afkham ◽  
Erin Keely

Abstract Background Since 2010, the Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialist Advice through eConsultation) has allowed primary care providers (PCPs) to submit clinical questions to specialists through a secure web service. The study objectives are to describe questions asked to Infectious Diseases specialists through eConsultation and assess impact on physician behaviors. Methods eConsults completed through the Champlain BASE service from April 15, 2013 to January 29, 2015 were characterized by the type of question asked and infectious disease content. Usage data and PCP responses to a closeout survey were analyzed to determine eConsult response time, change in referral plans, and change in planned course of action. Results Of the 224 infectious diseases eConsults, the most common question types were as follows: interpretation of a clinical test 18.0% (41), general management 16.5 % (37), and indications/goals of treating a particular condition 16.5% (37). The most frequently consulted infectious diseases were as follows: tuberculosis 14.3% (32), Lyme disease 14.3% (32), and parasitology 12.9% (29). Within 24 hours, 63% of cases responded to the questions, and 82% of cases took under 15 minutes to complete. In 32% of cases, a face-to-face referral was originally planned by the PCP but was no longer needed. In 8% of cases, the PCP referred the patient despite originally not planning to make a referral. In 55% of cases, the PCP either received new information or changed their course of action. Conclusions An eConsult service provides PCPs with timely access to infectious disease specialists’ advice that often results in a change in plans for a face-to-face referral.

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. Bradi ◽  
Lucian Sitwell ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Amir Afkham ◽  
Erin Keely

BackgroundAccess to neurology consultation is limited by high demand and urgency of the presentation. Champlain BASETM (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) (eConsult service) aims to increase access through direct communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists. Rapid responses to PCP questions can guide management and sometimes relieve the need for a formal consultation. We reviewed which topics were frequently addressed, the types of questions asked, and the effect on primary care for the patient.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 387 consecutive questions submitted to the Champlain BASETM service between May 2011 and January 2015 and the data generated from routine use and PCP exit surveys. Questions were categorized by topic and type and analyzed quantitatively. This included time required to answer each question and effect on plans for traditional referral and clinical course of action.ResultsThe top 5 topics were headache (17%), incidental imaging findings (11%), numbness/tingling (11%), seizure (9%), and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) (9%). Fifty-one percent were related to diagnosis (choice of test, imaging interpretation, symptom interpretation), 23% to drug treatment (choice, adverse effects, prescribing instructions), and 17% to management (general, need for referral). Eighty-eight percent of questions took less than 10 minutes of specialist time to answer, and 80% were answered within 1 day. eConsults decreased face-to-face referrals by 50%. In 54% of cases, the PCP received information for a new course of action.ConclusionsWe found that an eConsult service provides timely access to neurologists and can divert half of intended face-to-face consultations. The most common questions posed by PCPs regarded diagnosis and drug therapy for headaches, seizures, altered sensation, and CVD. eConsult services could provide guidance for continuing medical education planning in neurology.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 42-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karima Khamisa ◽  
Adam Fogel ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Erin Keely ◽  
Amir Afkham

Abstract Background Limited access to specialist care remains a major barrier to health care in Canada. The Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service is a secure web-based tool that gives primary care providers (PCPs) expedited access to specialist advice for their patients in Ontario, Canada. Hematology is the third most commonly consulted specialty in the eConsult service, accounting for 8% of all cases. The purpose of this study is to perform an in-depth analysis to describe the types of questions, content, utilization, and impact of hematology eConsults submitted by PCPs. Additionally, the results will inform future continuing medical education activities for PCPs. Methods All Hematology eConsults completed between April 1, 2011 and January 31, 2015 were included. We analyzed and categorized each consultation by: (1) clinical content (up to two per case) using a modification of the International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC-2); and (2) type of questions asked by the PCP based on a validated taxonomy. Other data including PCP designation, time for specialist to complete the eConsult, specialist response time, perceived value of the eConsult by the PCP, and the need for a face-to-face referral following the eConsult was collected in real time via the eConsult service and a survey completed by the initiating PCP at the closure of each eConsult. Results There were a total of 436 Hematology eConsults submitted, 87% from physicians and 13% from Nurse Practitioners. Most cases were answered within 3 days. The most common types of questions being asked pertained to management of hematologic disorders (25%), interpretation of a laboratory test (22%) and appropriate further investigative tests (18%). Common clinical content categories were anemia (22%), neutropenia (13%), high ferritin (11%), monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or an abnormal protein electrophoresis (10%) and thrombocytopenia (10%). Two clinical content categories were included in 19% of cases. Self-reported response time by hematologists was under 10 minutes in >75% of cases. Over 66% of cases did not require a face-to-face visit with the specialist following an eConsult; in fact, in 46% of cases an unnecessary referral was avoided. In 4% of cases, a face-to-face consultation was initiated where one was not originally contemplated. PCPs gained new or additional advice for a course of action in 58% of eConsults, and were able to confirm their original course of action in 39% of cases. PCPs rated the value of the eConsult service as ≥4/5 for both themselves and patients in >90% of cases. Impact The hematology eConsult service has significantly increased access to specialist care in a timely manner compared to traditional face-to-face consultations. The service allowed a significant proportion of patients to avoid traditional consultations leading to the potential of cost savings and increased patient safety. Identifying the most common questions and content being asked via the eConsult service will allow for more informed continuing medical education programs for PCPs so that patients can be better served in the primary care setting. Disclosures Khamisa: Amgen: Speakers Bureau.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-395
Author(s):  
Nathan P. Young ◽  
David B. Burkholder ◽  
Lindsey M. Philpot ◽  
Paul M. McKie ◽  
Jon O. Ebbert

BackgroundSynchronous collaboration as defined by a simultaneous encounter between primary care providers (PCPs), patients, and neurologists may improve access to neurologic expertise, care value, and satisfaction of PCPs and patients. We examined a series of synchronous collaborations and report outcomes, PCP satisfaction, downstream utilization, and illustrative case examples.MethodsWithin an outpatient collaborative primary care–neurology care model, we implemented synchronous video consultations from a central hub to satellite clinics while increasing availability of synchronous telephone and face-to-face collaboration. PCP experience was assessed by a postcollaboration survey. Individual cases were summarized. Clinical and utilization outcomes were assessed by a neurologist immediately after and by follow-up chart review.ResultsA total of 58 total synchronous collaborations were performed: 30 by telephone (52%), 18 face to face (31%), and 10 by video (17%) over 27 clinic half-days. The most frequent outcomes as assessed by the neurologist were reassurance of the PCP (23/58; 40%) and patient (22/59; 38%), and the neurologist changed the treatment plan (23/58; 40%). A subsequent face-to-face consultation was completed in 15% (6/58) of patients initially assessed by telephone or video. Test utilization was avoided in 40% (23/58). Unintended utilization occurred 9% (5/58). Most PCPs were very satisfied with the ease of access, quality of care, and reported high likelihood of subsequent use. PCPs perceived similar or less time spent during synchronous vs asynchronous collaboration and neurologist usually altered the testing (87.8%) and treatment plan (95.2%).ConclusionsSynchronous collaboration between neurologists and PCPs may improve timely access to neurologic expertise, downstream utilization, and PCP satisfaction.


Author(s):  
Jean-Grégoire Leduc ◽  
Erin Keely ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Amir Afkham ◽  
Misha Marovac ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients and primary care providers (PCP) can experience frustration about poor access to specialist care. The Champlain Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation (BASETM) is a secure online platform that allows PCPs to ask a clinical question to 142 different specialty groups. The specialist is expected to respond within 7 days. Methods: This is a retrospective review of the Champlain BASETM respirology eConsults from January 2017 to December 2018. The eConsults were categorized by types of question asked by the referring provider, and by the clinical content of the referral. Specialists’ response time and time spent answering the clinical question was analyzed. Referring providers close out surveys were reviewed to assess the impact of the respirology eConsult service on traditional referral rates and clinical course of action. Results: Of the 26,679 cases submitted to the Champlain BASE TM eConsult service 268 were respirology cases (1%). 91% were sent by family physicians, 9% by nurse practitioners. The median time to respond by specialists was 0.8 days, and the median time billed by specialists was 20 minutes. The most common topics were pulmonary nodules and masses (16.4%), cough (10.4%), infective problems (8.6%), COPD (8.6%) and dyspnea NYD (7.8%). The most common types of question asked by PCP were related to investigations warranted (43.1% of cases), general management (17.5%), monitoring (12.6%), need for a respirology referral (12.3%), and drug of choice (6.3%). In 23% of cases the PCP indicated they were planning to refer the patient and no longer need to (avoided referrals) and in 13% of cases the PCP was not going to refer but did after receiving the eConsult advice (prompted referrals). The eConsult led to a new or additional clinical course of action by the PCP in 49% of cases. In 51% of cases the PCP suggested the clinical topic would be well suited to a CME event. Conclusions: Participation in eConsult services can improve timely access to respirologists while potentially avoiding clinic visit and significantly impacting referring PCPs clinical course of action. Using the most common clinical topics and types of question for CME planning should be considered. Future research may include a cost analysis, and provider perspectives on the role of eConsult in respirology care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra J. Rolston ◽  
Tamlin S. Conner ◽  
Lisa K. Stamp ◽  
Tia Neha ◽  
Suzanne Pitama ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Gout is a common form of arthritis that is typically managed in primary care. Gout management guidelines emphasise patient education for successful treatment outcomes, but there is limited literature about the educational experiences of people living with gout in New Zealand, particularly for Māori, who have higher gout prevalence and worse gout outcomes than Pākehā. AIM To explore gout patient education in primary care from the perspectives of Māori and Pākehā people with gout. METHODS In total, 69 people with gout were recruited through primary care providers in three locations across New Zealand. Nine semi-structured focus groups were run with Māori and Pākehā participants in separate groups. RESULTS Thematic analysis yielded two themes in relation to gout education: (i) ‘Multiple sources of gout education’; and (ii) ‘Gaps in gout knowledge’. Participants received education from general practitioners, educational resources, family and friends, and their own experiences. Māori participants preferred information to be kanohi-ki-te-kanohi (face-to-face) and with significant others present where necessary. Participants disclosed gaps in gout’s epidemiology and management. Pākehā and Māori participants reported limited understanding of the genetic basis of gout or the biological underpinnings of the condition and its treatments, but learned treatment adherence through experience. DISCUSSION Despite improved gout patient education, knowledge gaps remain and may contribute to poor medication adherence. Gout patient education interventions need to be tailored to culture and incorporate suitable methods of disseminating information about gout management.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 506-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Ladd ◽  
Mirna Becevic ◽  
Hope Misterovich ◽  
Karen Edison

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common dermatologic disorder that is estimated to affect 15–20% of the general population. Because of its prevalence, it may be expected that ACD should be easily recognized. However, it can present with many clinical variations that may complicate diagnosis. Although ACD is a treatable condition, patients from rural and underserved areas suffer if timely access to specialty care is limited. Dermatology Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Dermatology ECHO) telemedicine sessions were created to mentor rural primary care providers (PCPs). To illustrate their benefit, we present the case of a 19-year-old female patient who suffered from worsening undiagnosed ACD for over nine months following a laparoscopic appendectomy. During that time, the surgeon and multiple PCPs treated her with antibiotics, antivirals, and Scabicide without improvement in her condition. The de-identified patient case was presented by her PCP during the Dermatology ECHO session. The Dermatology ECHO specialty team mentored and educated the PCP in the diagnosis and treatment of ACD. After making the diagnosis, the patient received new treatment and her condition improved significantly. Dermatology ECHO provides a knowledge-sharing network for participating PCPs that may improve patient outcomes and reduce patient suffering.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatinderpreet Singh ◽  
Allison Lou ◽  
Michael Green ◽  
Erin Keely ◽  
Mary Greenaway ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Access to transgender care in Canada is poor. Although primary care providers are ideally positioned to initiate care, many feel uncomfortable providing transgender care. This study aimed to explore the impact of an electronic consultation (eConsult) service between primary care providers and transgender care specialists on access to care and to explore the content of clinical questions that were asked. Methods This was a retrospective mixed methods analysis of 62 eConsults submitted between January 2017 and December 2018 by primary care providers to specialists in transgender care in a health region in eastern Ontario, Canada. A descriptive analysis was conducted to assess the average response time and the total time spent by the specialist for the eConsults. An inductive and deductive content analysis was carried out to identify common themes of clinical questions being asked to transgender specialists. A post-eConsult survey completed by primary care providers was assessed to gain insight into avoided face-to-face referrals and overall provider satisfaction. Results The median specialist response time was 1.2 days (range: 1 h to 5 days) and the average time spent by specialists per eConsult was 18 min (range: 10 to 40 min). The qualitative analysis identified six major themes: 1) interpretation/management of abnormal bloodwork, 2) change in management due to lack of desired effect/hormone levels not a target, 3) initiation of hormone therapy/initial work up, 4) management of adverse effects of hormone therapy, 5) transition related surgery counseling and post-op complications, and 6) management of patients with comorbidities. Approximately one-third of eConsults resulted in an avoided face-to-face referral and 95% of primary care providers rated the value of their eConsult as a 5 (excellent value) or 4. Conclusions This study demonstrated that a transgender eConsult service has potential to significantly improve access to care for transgender patients. Given the importance that timely access has on improving mental health and reducing suicide attempts, eConsult has the potential to make a substantial clinical impact on this population. Identified themes of eConsult questions provides insight into potential gaps in knowledge amongst primary care providers that could help inform future continuing education events.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S460-S461
Author(s):  
Kristen Nocka ◽  
Julia Raifman ◽  
Christina Crowley ◽  
Omar Galárraga ◽  
Ira Wilson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the form of daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF/FTC) is a potentially transformative tool to prevent HIV infection. However, PrEP scale-up in the United States has been slow and difficult to evaluate comprehensively. All payer claims databases (APCDs) are large datasets that contain information on medical and pharmaceutical claims from most public and private payers in each state, and provide an unusual opportunity to evaluate statewide PrEP implementation efforts. Methods We used 2012–2017 data from Rhode Island’s APCD and developed an algorithm to identify individuals prescribed TDF/FTC for PrEP. We compared APCD PrEP data to electronic medical record (EMR) data at the largest dedicated PrEP program in the state, and to other comprehensive pharmaceutical claims data (AIDSVu.org). We calculated the PrEP-to-Need ratio (PnR) based on annual HIV incidence, and used multivariable logistic regression to predict ZIP code-level PrEP use, and specialty of prescribing provider (primary care vs. infectious disease). Results The Rhode Island APCD included insurance claims for 917,633 individuals (87% of the Rhode Island population). PrEP use increased substantially in Rhode Island over the 5-year period, from 13 to 331 prescriptions between 2012 and 2017, with 546 total users during this time period. Users were predominantly male (89%) and privately insured (69.1%), and concentrated in Providence County (71.5%). The PnR ratio increased from 0.2 to 4.0 from 2012–2017. Compared with AIDSVu and EMR Data, the APCD underestimated the number of PrEP users in Rhode Island, but improved over time in documenting users. Infectious diseases specialists had 8.4 times the odds (95% CI: 5.4 to 12.9) of being a PrEP prescriber compared with primary care providers. A total of 2.6% of infectious disease specialists were PrEP prescribers compared with 0.33% of PCPs. The proportion of Black or Hispanic individuals in a ZIP-code was not a significant predictor of PrEP use. Conclusion APCDs offer an innovative approach to evaluate statewide PrEP implementation comprehensively. Engaging PCPs in PrEP implementation is critical to improve overall uptake among populations most at-risk. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Gorriz ◽  
Rosa De Ramon ◽  
Isidro Torregrosa Maicas ◽  
Francesc Moncho ◽  
Sergio Garcia-Vicente ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is recognized as a health problem in the general population; as a result, there is a growing demand for specialist services. This is especially relevant in the Spanish health system which covers the entire population free of charge. We describe our experience with new e-consultation software that allows specialists to provide clinical recommendations to primary care providers about non-subsidiary patients referred to our Nephrology Department. This system respects current protocols and is based on patient chart review without face-to-face visits, thus avoiding unnecessary time wastage in the healthcare system. Method Our Nephrology department covers the metropolitan area of Valencia with 341,972 citizens attended by 16 primary care centers. The Community IT software system allows all doctors (hospitals and primary care) to access the patient's medical records including laboratory, radiology, anthropometric data and treatments. A mailbox, developed as part of the Hospital General’s IT system, receives all proposed referrals from primary care doctors to our department. A nephrologist then decides if the e-consultation requires an in-person visit or can be answered as a non face-to-face visit. Thus, patient’s appointments are scheduled in less than one week (mean 3.8±4.5 days) and the outpatient visit in less than 14 days. The main referral criteria were: albumin/creatinine ratio> 300 mg/g, eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 (<45 in <70 years), renal progression, resistant hypertension in CKD patients, electrolyte abnormalities and renal anemia. Patients with conditions that do not meet referral criteria are attended and given the appropriate recommendations via e-consultation. The patient is not required to present at the hospital. We describe the results of e-consultations from 1St September 2017 to 31st December 2019. Results A total of 2641 consultations were submitted between September, 2017 to December, 2019 (807 in 2017, 861 in 2018 and 903 in 2019). Of these, 285 (12%) were answered as non face-to-face visit (6% of the 2017 e-consultations, 11% from 2018 and 24% from 2019). The characteristics of the 285 non face-to-face e-consultations: mean age: 68.9 ±19.5 years, female: 61.4%, diabetics: 31.2%. The main reasons for referral were: mild/low eGFR (35%), mild albuminuria (10%), administrative questions related to treatments (10%), mild hypertension (4%), mild electrolyte disturbances (2%), subacute renal dysfunction resolved (10%) (mostly NSAIDs), non-nephrology causes (mainly urological) (8%), non-renal pathology (simple renal cysts, other) (10%) and other causes (11%). The re-consult rate was 2% within the first year. Regarding patients referred with low eGFR, the mean age was 76 ± 14 years (range: 19-98), female sex: 73.9%, eGFR: 39±11 ml/min/1.73m2, serum creatinine 1.4 ± 0.4 mg/dL. Urine alb/creat ratio: 49±127 mg/g. Thirty five percent of them were between 70-79 years and 48% were> 80 years old. For those patients referred with mild albuminuria: mean age was: 57±21 years, male sex: 61%, diabetics: 31%, eGFR: 77±18 ml/min/1.73m2, serum creatinine 0.87±0.27 mg/dL. Urine alb/creat ratio: 83 ± 54 mg/g (range 33-128). There was a 17 day waiting list to attend an outpatient nephrology clinic in 2016 (previous to the initiation of the e-consultation period). On the contrary, during the study period it was 14 days in 2017 and 4 days each in both 2018 and 2019. Conclusion Our experience shows that non-face-to-face e-consultation for patients with mild renal pathology promotes the effective management of patients who do not meet remission criteria according to established protocols. It also prevents the remission of a significant percentage of patients, reduces the waiting list and optimizes the healthcare system’s resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document