scholarly journals Antisense inhibition of gene expression in cells by oligonucleotides incorporating locked nucleic acids: effect of mRNA target sequence and chimera design

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (23) ◽  
pp. 5160-5167 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Braasch
Biochemistry ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald F. Doyle ◽  
Dwaine A. Braasch ◽  
Bethany A. Janowski ◽  
David R. Corey

Biochemistry ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (25) ◽  
pp. 7572-7580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall L. Beane ◽  
Rosalyn Ram ◽  
Sylvie Gabillet ◽  
Khalil Arar ◽  
Brett P. Monia ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (40) ◽  
pp. 14221-14228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Østergaard ◽  
Pallavi Cheguru ◽  
Madhusudhan R. Papasani ◽  
Rodney A. Hill ◽  
Patrick J. Hrdlicka

Author(s):  
J. R. Hully ◽  
K. R. Luehrsen ◽  
K. Aoyagi ◽  
C. Shoemaker ◽  
R. Abramson

The development of PCR technology has greatly accelerated medical research at the genetic and molecular levels. Until recently, the inherent sensitivity of this technique has been limited to isolated preparations of nucleic acids which lack or at best have limited morphological information. With the obvious exception of cell lines, traditional PCR or reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) cannot identify the cellular source of the amplified product. In contrast, in situ hybridization (ISH) by definition, defines the anatomical location of a gene and/or it’s product. However, this technique lacks the sensitivity of PCR and cannot routinely detect less than 10 to 20 copies per cell. Consequently, the localization of rare transcripts, latent viral infections, foreign or altered genes cannot be identified by this technique. In situ PCR or in situ RT-PCR is a combination of the two techniques, exploiting the sensitivity of PCR and the anatomical definition provided by ISH. Since it’s initial description considerable advances have been made in the application of in situ PCR, improvements in protocols, and the development of hardware dedicated to in situ PCR using conventional microscope slides. Our understanding of the importance of viral latency or viral burden in regards to HIV, HPV, and KSHV infections has benefited from this technique, enabling detection of single viral copies in cells or tissue otherwise thought to be normal. Clearly, this technique will be useful tool in pathobiology especially carcinogenesis, gene therapy and manipulations, the study of rare gene transcripts, and forensics.


2017 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 2594-2602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Olson ◽  
Shohei Kotani ◽  
Bernard Yurke ◽  
Elton Graugnard ◽  
William L. Hughes

1988 ◽  
Vol 263 (31) ◽  
pp. 16334-16340
Author(s):  
H C Schröder ◽  
Y Kuchino ◽  
M Gramzow ◽  
B Kurelec ◽  
U Friese ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 23.2-24
Author(s):  
Y. P. Tsao ◽  
F. Y. Tseng ◽  
C. W. Chao ◽  
M. H. Chen ◽  
S. T. Chen

Background:Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with diverse etiological factors. It was recognized that interferon (IFN) signature involved in the progress of SLE. NLRP12 (NOD-like receptor family (NLR) pyrin domain containing 12) is a pyrin containing NLR protein that we had linked its new biological function to the cross-regulation of Toll like receptor (TLRs) and Rig-I like receptor (RIG-I) pathways. NLPR12 acts as an innate immune check-point in regulating type I IFNs expression during TLRs and RIG-I activation. The importance of NLRP12 in lupus disease activity remained to be elucidated.Objectives:To clarify the role of NLRP12 in regulating the interferon signature.Methods:Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from SLE patients and healthy donors for analysis of NLRP12 and IFN-α gene expression by RT-QPCR. PBMCs were applied for Chromatin immuneprecipitation (ChIP) assay and electrical mobility shift assay (EMSA) to determine the putative transcription factor that regulates NLRP12 expression. An involvement of epigenetic regulation of NLRP12 expression in SLE patients was also analyzed. Bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were collected from wild type mouse and Nlrp12 knocked-out mice. Another CD14+ monocytes were isolated from 10 cases of lupus patients and 8 cases of healthy control, following by stimulating different type of nucleic acids, and IFN-α and IL-6 were measured with ELISA assay. CD14+ monocytes in lupus patients were also pre-treated with IFNAR2 antibody for further nucleic acid stimulation. Two mice models were applied for evaluation the role of Nlrp12: intraperitoneal injection of TMPD (2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane, or pristane) in C57BL/6 mice and Faslpr mice. Both models were conducted with and without Nlrp12 knockout.Results:NLRP12 expression was significantly lower in PBMC isolated from SLE patients compared to healthy donors. The inverse correlation was observed in NLRP12 and IFNA gene expression as well as NLRP12 expression and amount of double-stranded DNA autoantibody in SLE patients. NLRP12 expression showed negative correlations with IFN-α treatment, as well as herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection. Results from ChIP and EMSA analysis indicated a potential transcription factor 1 (TF-1) regulating NLRP12 promoter activity. TF-1 lead to transcriptional suppression of NLRP12 in SLE PBMC, and it was gradually induced after IFN treatment. Recruitment of TF-1 to NLRP12 promoter in SLE PBMC compared to the healthy PBMC was detected, and increased when treating with IFN. Human CD14+ monocytes collected from lupus and healthy control stimulating with different type of nucleic acids revealing significant increasing level of IFN-α and IL-6 in lupus patients. Among animal models, both pristine induced mice and Faslpr mice revealed increasing autoantibodies production and severity of glomerulonephritis in Nlrp12-/- group in comparison with Nlrp12+/+ ones, indicating the role of NLRP12 in maintaining positive interferon signature as well as disease activity.Conclusion:Expression level of NLRP1.2 has been demonstrated to be a biomarker of disease activity in SLE patients. The NLRP12 was involved in the interferon signature, which was also negatively regulated by TF-1. Both clinical samples and animal models revealed NLRP12 in maintaining the positive interferon signature, indicating the possible role of exacerbating factor for lupus disease activity.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Mannarino ◽  
Hosni Cherif ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Kai Sheng ◽  
Oded Rabau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is an increased level of senescent cells and toll-like teceptor-1, -2, -4, and -6 (TLR) expression in degenerating intervertebral discs (IVDs) from back pain patients. However, it is currently not known if the increase in expression of TLRs is related to the senescent cells or if it is a more general increase on all cells. It is also not known if TLR activation in IVD cells will induce cell senescence. Methods Cells from non-degenerate human IVD were obtained from spine donors and cells from degenerate IVDs came from patients undergoing surgery for low back pain. Gene expression of TLR-1,2,4,6, senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) markers was evaluated by RT-qPCR in isolated cells. Matrix synthesis was verified with safranin-O staining and Dimethyl-Methylene Blue Assay (DMMB) confirmed proteoglycan content. Protein expression of p16INK4a, SASP factors, and TLR-2 was evaluated by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and/or by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results An increase in senescent cells was found following 48-h induction with a TLR-2/6 agonist in cells from both non-degenerate and degenerating human IVDs. Higher levels of SASP factors, TLR-2 gene expression, and protein expression were found following 48-h induction with TLR-2/6 agonist. Treatment with o-vanillin reduced the number of senescent cells, and increased matrix synthesis in IVD cells from back pain patients. Treatment with o-vanillin after induction with TLR-2/6 agonist reduced gene and protein expression of SASP factors and TLR-2. Co-localized staining of p16INK4a and TLR-2 demonstrated that senescent cells have a high TLR-2 expression. Conclusions Taken together our data demonstrate that activation of TLR-2/6 induce senescence and increase TLR-2 and SASP expression in cells from non-degenerate IVDs of organ donors without degeneration and back pain and in cells from degenerating human IVD of patients with disc degeneration and back pain. The senescent cells showed high TLR-2 expression suggesting a link between TLR activation and cell senescence in human IVD cells. The reduction in senescence, SASP, and TLR-2 expression suggest o-vanillin as a potential disease-modifying drug for patients with disc degeneration and back pain.


Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 416
Author(s):  
Saumya Jani ◽  
Maria Soledad Ramirez ◽  
Marcelo E. Tolmasky

Antisense technologies consist of the utilization of oligonucleotides or oligonucleotide analogs to interfere with undesirable biological processes, commonly through inhibition of expression of selected genes. This field holds a lot of promise for the treatment of a very diverse group of diseases including viral and bacterial infections, genetic disorders, and cancer. To date, drugs approved for utilization in clinics or in clinical trials target diseases other than bacterial infections. Although several groups and companies are working on different strategies, the application of antisense technologies to prokaryotes still lags with respect to those that target other human diseases. In those cases where the focus is on bacterial pathogens, a subset of the research is dedicated to produce antisense compounds that silence or reduce expression of antibiotic resistance genes. Therefore, these compounds will be adjuvants administered with the antibiotic to which they reduce resistance levels. A varied group of oligonucleotide analogs like phosphorothioate or phosphorodiamidate morpholino residues, as well as peptide nucleic acids, locked nucleic acids and bridge nucleic acids, the latter two in gapmer configuration, have been utilized to reduce resistance levels. The major mechanisms of inhibition include eliciting cleavage of the target mRNA by the host’s RNase H or RNase P, and steric hindrance. The different approaches targeting resistance to β-lactams include carbapenems, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. The purpose of this short review is to summarize the attempts to develop antisense compounds that inhibit expression of resistance to antibiotics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document