scholarly journals Stabilities of intrastrand pyrimidine motif DNA and RNA triple helices

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 770-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Hoyne
Keyword(s):  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Triple Helices

scholarly journals Stability of an RNA•DNA–DNA triple helix depends on base triplet composition and length of the RNA third strand

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 7213-7222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte N Kunkler ◽  
Jacob P Hulewicz ◽  
Sarah C Hickman ◽  
Matthew C Wang ◽  
Phillip J McCown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Stability ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Helix Formation ◽  
Canonical Base ◽  
Triple Helix Formation ◽  
Triple Helices ◽  
Dna Triple Helix ◽  
The Stability

AbstractRecent studies suggest noncoding RNAs interact with genomic DNA, forming an RNA•DNA–DNA triple helix that regulates gene expression. However, base triplet composition of pyrimidine motif RNA•DNA–DNA triple helices is not well understood beyond the canonical U•A–T and C•G–C base triplets. Using native gel-shift assays, the relative stability of 16 different base triplets at a single position, Z•X–Y (where Z = C, U, A, G and X–Y = A–T, G–C, T–A, C–G), in an RNA•DNA–DNA triple helix was determined. The canonical U•A–T and C•G–C base triplets were the most stable, while three non-canonical base triplets completely disrupted triple-helix formation. We further show that our RNA•DNA–DNA triple helix can tolerate up to two consecutive non-canonical A•G–C base triplets. Additionally, the RNA third strand must be at least 19 nucleotides to form an RNA•DNA–DNA triple helix but increasing the length to 27 nucleotides does not increase stability. The relative stability of 16 different base triplets in DNA•DNA–DNA and RNA•RNA–RNA triple helices was distinctly different from those in RNA•DNA–DNA triple helices, showing that base triplet stability depends on strand composition being DNA and/or RNA. Multiple factors influence the stability of triple helices, emphasizing the importance of experimentally validating formation of computationally predicted triple helices.

Aminoglycoside−Nucleic Acid Interactions:  Remarkable Stabilization of DNA and RNA Triple Helices by Neomycin

2001 ◽  
Vol 123 (23) ◽  
pp. 5385-5395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dev P. Arya ◽  
R. Lane Coffee ◽  
Bert Willis ◽  
Anna I. Abramovitch
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Triple Helices ◽  
Nucleic Acid Interactions

ChemInform Abstract: Aminoglycoside-Nucleic Acid Interactions: Remarkable Stabilization of DNA and RNA Triple Helices by Neomycin.

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (38) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
Dev P. Arya ◽  
R. Lane Coffee Jr. ◽  
Bert Willis ◽  
Anna I. Abramovitch
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Triple Helices ◽  
Nucleic Acid Interactions

scholarly journals Molecular structure of a U•A-U-rich RNA triple helix with 11 consecutive base triples

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 3304-3314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Ruszkowska ◽  
Milosz Ruszkowski ◽  
Jacob P Hulewicz ◽  
Zbigniew Dauter ◽  
Jessica A Brown
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Double Helix ◽  
Structural Parameters ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Double Helices ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Triple Helices ◽  
Rna Triple Helix

Abstract Three-dimensional structures have been solved for several naturally occurring RNA triple helices, although all are limited to six or fewer consecutive base triples, hindering accurate estimation of global and local structural parameters. We present an X-ray crystal structure of a right-handed, U•A-U-rich RNA triple helix with 11 continuous base triples. Due to helical unwinding, the RNA triple helix spans an average of 12 base triples per turn. The double helix portion of the RNA triple helix is more similar to both the helical and base step structural parameters of A′-RNA rather than A-RNA. Its most striking features are its wide and deep major groove, a smaller inclination angle and all three strands favoring a C3′-endo sugar pucker. Despite the presence of a third strand, the diameter of an RNA triple helix remains nearly identical to those of DNA and RNA double helices. Contrary to our previous modeling predictions, this structure demonstrates that an RNA triple helix is not limited in length to six consecutive base triples and that longer RNA triple helices may exist in nature. Our structure provides a starting point to establish structural parameters of the so-called ‘ideal’ RNA triple helix, analogous to A-RNA and B-DNA double helices.

High-resolution nucleic acid sequence mapping via in situ hybridization at the Electron Microscope level

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 752-753
Author(s):  
B.A. Hamkalo ◽  
S. Narayanswami ◽  
A.P. Kausch
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Interphase Nucleus ◽  
Genome Mapping ◽  
Precise Location ◽  
Electron Microscope Level ◽  
Rna Sequences ◽  
Fundamental Interest ◽  
Whole Cells ◽  
Dna And Rna

The availability of nonradioactive methods to label nucleic acids an the resultant rapid and greater sensitivity of detection has catapulted the technique of in situ hybridization to become the method of choice to locate of specific DNA and RNA sequences on chromosomes and in whole cells in cytological preparations in many areas of biology. It is being applied to problems of fundamental interest to basic cell and molecular biologists such as the organization of the interphase nucleus in the context of putative functional domains; it is making major contributions to genome mapping efforts; and it is being applied to the analysis of clinical specimens. Although fluorescence detection of nucleic acid hybrids is routinely used, certain questions require greater resolution. For example, very closely linked sequences may not be separable using fluorescence; the precise location of sequences with respect to chromosome structures may be below the resolution of light microscopy(LM); and the relative positions of sequences on very small chromosomes may not be feasible.

Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) of DNA and RNA

1989 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Patricia G. Arscott ◽  
Gil Lee ◽  
Victor A. Bloomfield ◽  
D. Fennell Evans
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Structures ◽  
Inorganic Materials ◽  
Resolving Power ◽  
Scanning Tunneling ◽  
Tunneling Microscopy ◽  
Form And Function ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Calf Thymus ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Relationship

STM is one of the most promising techniques available for visualizing the fine details of biomolecular structure. It has been used to map the surface topography of inorganic materials in atomic dimensions, and thus has the resolving power not only to determine the conformation of small molecules but to distinguish site-specific features within a molecule. That level of detail is of critical importance in understanding the relationship between form and function in biological systems. The size, shape, and accessibility of molecular structures can be determined much more accurately by STM than by electron microscopy since no staining, shadowing or labeling with heavy metals is required, and there is no exposure to damaging radiation by electrons. Crystallography and most other physical techniques do not give information about individual molecules.We have obtained striking images of DNA and RNA, using calf thymus DNA and two synthetic polynucleotides, poly(dG-me5dC)·poly(dG-me5dC) and poly(rA)·poly(rU).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document