Two New Sampling Plans for European Red Mite 1 Surveys on Apple Utilizing the Negative Binomial Distribution 2

1980 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Mowery ◽  
Larry A. Hull ◽  
Dean Asquith
Keyword(s):  
Negative Binomial Distribution ◽  
Binomial Distribution ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Sampling Plans ◽  
European Red Mite

scholarly journals Sampling Hazelnuts for Aflatoxin: Effect of Sample Size and Accept/Reject Limit on Reducing the Risk of Misclassifying Lots

2007 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 1028-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guner Ozay ◽  
Ferda Seyhan ◽  
Aysun Yilmaz ◽  
Thomas B Whitaker ◽  
Andrew B Slate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Negative Binomial Distribution ◽  
Binomial Distribution ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Food Additives ◽  
Sampling Plan ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sampling Plans ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Sample Test

Abstract About 100 countries have established regulatory limits for aflatoxin in food and feeds. Because these limits vary widely among regulating countries, the Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants began work in 2004 to harmonize aflatoxin limits and sampling plans for aflatoxin in almonds, pistachios, hazelnuts, and Brazil nuts. Studies were developed to measure the uncertainty and distribution among replicated sample aflatoxin test results taken from aflatoxin-contaminated treenut lots. The uncertainty and distribution information is used to develop a model that can evaluate the performance (risk of misclassifying lots) of aflatoxin sampling plan designs for treenuts. Once the performance of aflatoxin sampling plans can be predicted, they can be designed to reduce the risks of misclassifying lots traded in either the domestic or export markets. A method was developed to evaluate the performance of sampling plans designed to detect aflatoxin in hazelnuts lots. Twenty hazelnut lots with varying levels of contamination were sampled according to an experimental protocol where 16 test samples were taken from each lot. The observed aflatoxin distribution among the 16 aflatoxin sample test results was compared to lognormal, compound gamma, and negative binomial distributions. The negative binomial distribution was selected to model aflatoxin distribution among sample test results because it gave acceptable fits to observed distributions among sample test results taken from a wide range of lot concentrations. Using the negative binomial distribution, computer models were developed to calculate operating characteristic curves for specific aflatoxin sampling plan designs. The effect of sample size and accept/reject limits on the chances of rejecting good lots (sellers' risk) and accepting bad lots (buyers' risk) was demonstrated for various sampling plan designs.

Sampling dried figs for aflatoxin - Part II: effect of sampling plan design on reducing the risk of misclassifying lots

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ozer ◽  
H.I. Oktay Basegmez ◽  
T.B. Whitaker ◽  
A.B. Slate ◽  
F.G. Giesbrecht
Keyword(s):  
Negative Binomial Distribution ◽  
Binomial Distribution ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Sampling Plan ◽  
Export Market ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sampling Plans ◽  
Binomial Distributions ◽  
Sample Test ◽  
Codex Standard

Because aflatoxin limits vary widely among regulating countries, the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods (CCCF) began work in 2006 to harmonise maximum levels (MLs) and sampling plans for aflatoxin in dried figs. Studies were developed to measure the variability and distribution among replicated sample aflatoxin test results taken from the same aflatoxin contaminated lot of dried figs so that a model could be developed to evaluate the risk of misclassifying lots of dried figs by aflatoxin sampling plan designs. The model was then be used by the CCCF electronic working group (eWG) to recommend MLs and aflatoxin sampling plan designs to the full CCCF membership for lots traded in the export market. Sixteen 10 kg samples were taken from each of 20 dried fig lots with varying levels of contamination. The observed aflatoxin distribution among the 16-aflatoxin sample test results was compared to the normal, lognormal, compound gamma, and negative binomial distributions. The negative binomial distribution was selected to model aflatoxin distribution among sample test results because it gave acceptable fits to observed aflatoxin distributions among sample test results taken from the same contaminated lot. Using the negative binomial distribution, a computer model was developed to show the effect of the number and size of samples and the accept/reject limits on the chances of rejecting good lots (seller's risk) and accepting bad lots (buyer's risk). The information was shared with the CCCF eWG and in March 2012, the 6th session of CCCF adopted at step 5/8 an aflatoxin sampling plan where three 10 kg samples must all test less than an ML of 10 µg/kg total aflatoxins to accept a dried fig lot. The 35th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission met in July 2012 and adopted the CCCF recommendations for the ML and the sampling plan as an official Codex standard.

Niche Sharing in Intertidal Mollusks and Decapods in Rocky Shore of Easter Island

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-422
Author(s):  
P. De los Ríos ◽  
E. Ibáñez Arancibia
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Negative Binomial Distribution ◽  
Binomial Distribution ◽  
Rocky Shore ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Null Model ◽  
Easter Island ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Distribution Analysis ◽  
Field Works

Abstract The coastal marine ecosystems in Easter Island have been poorly studied, and the main studies were isolated species records based on scientific expeditions. The aim of the present study is to apply a spatial distribution analysis and niche sharing null model in published data on intertidal marine gastropods and decapods in rocky shore in Easter Island based in field works in 2010, and published information from CIMAR cruiser in 2004. The field data revealed the presence of decapods Planes minutus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius, 1793), whereas it was observed the gastropods Nodilittorina pyramidalis pascua Rosewater, 1970 and Nerita morio (G. B. Sowerby I., 1833). The available information revealed the presence of more species in data collected in 2004 in comparison to data collected in 2010, with one species markedly dominant in comparison to the other species. The spatial distribution of species reported in field works revealed that P. minutus and N. morio have aggregated pattern and negative binomial distribution, L. variegatus had uniform pattern with binomial distribution, and finally N. pyramidalis pascua, in spite of aggregated distribution pattern, had not negative binomial distribution. Finally, the results of null model revealed that the species reported did not share ecological niche due to competition absence. The results would agree with other similar information about littoral and sub-littoral fauna for Easter Island.

ANALISIS RISIKO OPERASIONAL MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN DISTRIBUSI KERUGIAN DENGAN METODE AGREGAT

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Y. ARBI ◽  
R. BUDIARTI ◽  
I G. P. PURNABA
Keyword(s):  
Negative Binomial Distribution ◽  
Binomial Distribution ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Financial Institution ◽  
Expected Value ◽  
Insurance Companies ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Loss Distribution Approach ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Impact

Operational risk is defined as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or external problems. Insurance companies as financial institution that also faced at risk. Recording of operating losses in insurance companies, were not properly conducted so that the impact on the limited data for operational losses. In this work, the data of operational loss observed from the payment of the claim. In general, the number of insurance claims can be modelled using the Poisson distribution, where the expected value of the claims is similar with variance, while the negative binomial distribution, the expected value was bound to be less than the variance.Analysis tools are used in the measurement of the potential loss is the loss distribution approach with the aggregate method. In the aggregate method, loss data grouped in a frequency distribution and severity distribution. After doing 10.000 times simulation are resulted total loss of claim value, which is total from individual claim every simulation. Then from the result was set the value of potential loss (OpVar) at a certain level confidence.

scholarly journals On the Accuracy of the Generalized Gamma Approximation to Generalized Negative Binomial Random Sums

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 1571
Author(s):  
Irina Shevtsova ◽  
Mikhail Tselishchev
Keyword(s):  
Negative Binomial Distribution ◽  
Binomial Distribution ◽  
Law Of Large Numbers ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Infinite Divisibility ◽  
Random Sums ◽  
Generalized Gamma ◽  
Second Moments ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Generalized Negative Binomial Distribution

We investigate the proximity in terms of zeta-structured metrics of generalized negative binomial random sums to generalized gamma distribution with the corresponding parameters, extending thus the zeta-structured estimates of the rate of convergence in the Rényi theorem. In particular, we derive upper bounds for the Kantorovich and the Kolmogorov metrics in the law of large numbers for negative binomial random sums of i.i.d. random variables with nonzero first moments and finite second moments. Our method is based on the representation of the generalized negative binomial distribution with the shape and exponent power parameters no greater than one as a mixed geometric law and the infinite divisibility of the negative binomial distribution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document