β-Blockers, Tachycardia, and Survival Following Sepsis: An Observational Cohort Study

Author(s):  
Dmitri Guz ◽  
Shira Buchritz ◽  
Alina Guz ◽  
Alon Ikan ◽  
Tania Babich ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sepsis is associated with excessive release of catecholamines, which causes tachycardia and is correlated with poor clinical outcome. β-Blockers (BBs) may blunt this effect on heart rate (HR). The objective of this study is to assess whether long-term BB therapy is associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis admitted to internal medicine wards. Methods We performed a single-center, observational cohort study. We included adult patients who were hospitalized in medicine departments due to sepsis. A propensity score model for BB therapy was used to match patients. The primary outcome was the 30-day all-cause mortality rate. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for an adverse outcome. Patients were stratified according to absolute tachycardia (HR ≥100/min) or relative tachycardia at presentation (tachycardia index above the third quartile, with tachycardia index defined as the ratio of HR to temperature). Results A total of 1186 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the propensity-matched cohort patients given BB treatment were younger (median age [interquartile range], 74 [62–82] vs 81 [68–87] years; P ≤ .001). BB treatment was associated with reduction in 30-day mortality rates for patients with absolute tachycardia (odds ratio, 0.406; 95% confidence interval, .177–.932). Final model with interaction variable of BB treatment with HR was associated with short-term survival (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, .148–.976). Selective BB therapy had a stronger protective effect than nonselective BB therapy. Conclusions Long-term BB therapy was associated with decreased mortality rate in patients hospitalized with sepsis in internal medicine wards exhibiting absolute and relative tachycardia.

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 424-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse R Fann ◽  
Anette Riisgaard Ribe ◽  
Henrik Schou Pedersen ◽  
Morten Fenger-Grøn ◽  
Jakob Christensen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 4358-4365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamdoh Al-Ameri ◽  
Michael Persson ◽  
Per Bergman ◽  
Anders Franco-Cereceda ◽  
Ulrik Sartipy

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Kamikawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Hayashi

Abstract Background Although the shock index is known to predict mortality and other severe outcomes, deriving it requires complex calculations. Subtracting the systolic blood pressure from the heart rate may produce a simple shock index that would be a clinically useful substitute for the shock index. In this study, we investigated whether the simple shock index was equivalent to the shock index. Methods This observational cohort study was conducted at 2 tertiary care hospitals. Patients who were transported by ambulance were recruited for this study and were excluded if they were aged < 15 years, had experienced prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, or had undergone inter-hospital transfer. Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient and regression equation were calculated, and two one-sided tests were performed to examine their equivalency. Results Among 5429 eligible patients, the correlation coefficient between the shock index and simple shock index was extremely high (0.917, 95% confidence interval 0.912 to 0.921, P < .001). The regression equation was estimated as sSI = 258.55 log SI. The two one-sided tests revealed a very strong equivalency between the shock index and the index estimated by the above equation using the simple shock index (mean difference was 0.004, 90% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.005). Conclusion The simple shock index strongly correlated with the shock index.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document