Due Process and Civil Procedure, or How to Do Codes with Theories

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-810
Author(s):  
Carlos Petit
Keyword(s):  
Due Process ◽  
Civil Procedure

scholarly journals Conversão da ação individual em ação coletiva: análise do conteúdo do artigo 333 do CPC/2015, das razões do veto da presidente da república e do aproveitamento do instituto no atual sistema processual/ Conversion from individual in collective action: analysis of the content from the article 333 in CPC/2015, the reasons of the veto of the President of the Republic and the use of the institute on current procedural system

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
Eduardo Cambi ◽  
Marcos Vargas Fogaça
Keyword(s):  
Collective Action ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Action Analysis ◽  
Collective Process ◽  
The Republic

O presente trabalho busca difundir o processo coletivo como instrumento para a melhoria da prestação jurisdicional. Também pretende a concretização das garantias constitucionais do direito processual brasileiro, corolários do devido processo legal coletivo, a partir de uma análise da conversão da ação individual em ação coletiva. Tal sugestão estava presente originalmente no artigo 333 do Código de Processo Civil de 2015 (NCPC), cuja inovação foi vetada pela Presidência da República. Para tanto, utiliza-se do método analítico de decomposição do instituto para analisar melhor cada especificidade. A conversão da demanda individual em demanda coletiva, prevista no texto vetado do NCPC, traria grandes conquistas a efetivação da justiça qualitativa, prestada de forma célere e efetiva. Assim, verifica-se a inconsistência do veto, uma vez que o instituto não estava mal disciplinado e permitia a convivência harmônica das técnicas de tutela coletiva de direitos com repercussão individual com as técnicas individuais de repercussão coletiva na sistemática processual civil brasileira. A partir da análise do incidente de coletivização, procura-se verificar em que medida tal instituto ainda pode ser aproveitado no atual sistema processual brasileiro.Palavras chave: Processo coletivo. Conversão da ação individual em ação coletiva. Veto ao Código de Processo Civil de 2015.AbstractThis study aims to spread the collective process as an instrument to the improvement of jurisdictional assistance and implementation of the constitutional principles of the Brazilian procedural law, corollaries of collective due process, on the basis of the analysis of conversion from individual in collective action, presents originally on article 333 of Civil Procedure Code of 2015, which was vetoed by the Presidency of the republic. Therefore, the analytical method of decomposition institute is used to better analyze each specificity. As the institute was regulated, the conversion from individual in collective action would bring great achievements to qualitative justice enforcement. Accordingly, there is inconsistency in Presidency’s veto, considering the institute wasn’t weak disciplined and there was the need for harmonious coexistence of rights collective protection techniques with individual techniques of collective repercussion on Brazilian civil procedure system.KeywordsCollective process. Conversion from individual in collective action. Veto on the Civil Procedure Code of 2015.

scholarly journals Rights of Due Process in Civil Procedurs of Some Countries in the World an in Vietnam

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Van Quan ◽  
Nguyen Bich Thao
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Due Process ◽  
The United States ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
United States Constitution ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The World ◽  
Fact Finding ◽  
The Right ◽  
Procedural Rights

Currently, civil procedure legal science in the world begins to study the application of fair procedural rights. Meanwhile, Vietnamese civil procedure legal science seems to pay attention to the proceedings instead of the procedural rights. In this context, the paper examines the application of rights of due process around the world and in Vietnam. From there, the author suggests a number of appropriate orientations in this area that Vietnam should apply in the near future in order to match the trend in the world and the reality of Vietnam. Keywords: Civil procedure, due process, rights of due process, human rights. References: [1] Rhonda Wasserman, Procedural Due Process: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004.[2] E. Thomas Sullivan and Toni M. Massaro, The Arc of Due Process in American Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, 2013.[3] Khoa Luật Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, Giáo trình Luật tố tụng dân sự Việt Nam, NXB. Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.[4] European Court of Human Rights (2013), Guide to Article 6: The Right to a Fair Trial (Civil Limb), http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_ENG.pdf.[5] C.H. Van Rhee & Alan Uzelac (eds.), Truth and Efficiency in Civil Litigation: Fundamental Aspects of Fact-Finding and Evidence-Taking in a Comparative Context, Intersentia, 2012, pp. 5-6.    

ESTOPPEL IN THE CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: ASPECTS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-250
Author(s):  
A.V. YAKHIMOVICH
Keyword(s):  
Due Process ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Principle ◽  
Legal Texts ◽  
Substantive Due Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Procedural Rights ◽  
Formal Requirements

Substantive due process is commonly recognized as fundamental guarantee of a person’s access to justice. One of the main conditions guaranteeing observance of the due process is litigants’ comprehensive sets of procedural rights. Ways in which they can assert their rights should be exhaustively defined as well. The extent of thoroughness of regulation may be different but it may not be absent. In that respect estoppel as a legal principle, which lacks formal requirements in the law, is problematic. The sustainability of judgements which are reasoned by way of employing a broad undefined concept of estoppel is questioned. One of the biggest doubts discussed is the viability of an idea where promissory estoppel is used as a source of a general estoppel concept. It is argued that promissory estoppel being a specific English obligation law instrument cannot be used as a source of limiting procedural rights of litigants. As for estoppel by representation, it can be safely adopted because of its nature as a source of identifying principal issues of fact. It has nothing to do with establishing or banning any personal or procedural rights. But in order to safely implement this type of estoppel it has to be thoroughly considered as to how exactly this instrument of procedure will be married with the current court’s legal duties. It has to decide cases upon all and truly established issues of fact in question. The problem is not a trivial one as even in leading English legal texts it is recognized the contradiction between court’s inquisitorial duties and using of these types of estoppel.

Preamble

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
European Law
Keyword(s):  
Due Process ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
International Institute ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
Due Process Of Law ◽  
American Law ◽  
Universal Procedure ◽  
The Impact

1. In 2004, the American Law Institute (ALI) and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) adopted the ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure.1 They were intended to help reduce the impact of differences between legal systems in lawsuits involving transnational commercial transactions. Their purpose was to propose a model of universal procedure that followed the essential elements of due process of law. They were accompanied by a set of “Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure”, which were not formally adopted by either UNIDROIT or the ALI but constituted a model implementation of the Principles, providing greater detail and illustrating how the Principles could be implemented in procedural rules. The Rules were to be considered either for adoption “or for further adaptation in various legal systems”, and along with the Principles could be considered as “a model for reform in domestic legislation”....

Due Process: No-Win System

ASHA Leader ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
pp. 18-20
Author(s):  
Susan Boswell
Keyword(s):  
Due Process

Dysphagia Services in Schools: Applying Special Education Requirements to a Health Service

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lissa Power-deFur
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Due Process Hearings ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Eligibility Determination ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Provision Of Services ◽  
Related Service ◽  
Specially Designed Instruction

Abstract School speech-language pathologists and districts frequently need guidance regarding how the legal provisions of special education affect the needs of children with dysphagia. This article reviews key principles of special education that guide eligibility determination and provision of services to all children. In the eligibility process, the school team would determine if the child's disability has an adverse effect on his/her education program and if the child needed special education (specially designed instruction) and related services. Dysphagia services would be considered a related service, a health service needed for the child to benefit from specially designed instruction. The article concludes with recommendations for practice that stem from a review of due process hearings and court cases for children with disabilities that include swallowing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document