scholarly journals Real-life implementation of guidelines on the hospital-to-home transition for older patients: a cohort study in general practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Aline Hurtaud ◽  
François Lallier ◽  
Matthieu Heidet ◽  
Charline Arnoult ◽  
Moustapha Dramé ◽  
...  

Abstract Background hospital discharge is a critical event for older patients. The French guidelines recommended the swift transmission of a discharge summary to the general practitioner (GP) and a primary care consultation within 7 days. The relevance and feasibility of these guidelines have not previously been assessed. Objective to perform a real-life assessment of compliance with French guidelines on the transmission of discharge summaries and post-discharge medical reviews and to examine these factors’ association with 30-day readmissions. Design a prospective multicentre cohort study. Setting primary care (general practice) in France. Subjects a sample of GPs and the same number of patients aged 75 or over having consulted within 30 days of hospital discharge. Methods the main endpoints were the proportion of discharge summaries available and the proportion of patients consulting their GP within 7 days. The 30-day readmission rate was also measured. Factors associated with these endpoints were assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results seventy-one GPs (mean ± standard deviation age: 49 ± 11; males: 62%) and 71 patients (mean age: 84 ± 5; males: 52%; living at home: 94%; cognitive disorders: 22%) were included. Forty-six patients (65%, [95% confidence interval [CI]]: 53–76) consulted their GP within 7 days of hospital discharge. At the time of the consultation, 27 GPs (38% [95% CI]: 27–50) had not received the corresponding hospital discharge summary. Discharge summary availability was associated with a lower risk of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.25 [0.07–0.91]). Conclusions compliance with the French guidelines on hospital-to-home transitions is insufficient.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rune Aakvik Pedersen ◽  
Halfdan Petursson ◽  
Irene Hetlevik ◽  
Henriette Thune

Abstract Background The acute treatment for stroke takes place in hospitals and in Norway follow-up of stroke survivors residing in the communities largely takes place in general practice. In order to provide continuous post stroke care, these two levels of care must collaborate, and information and knowledge must be transferred between them. The discharge summary, a written report from the hospital, is central to this communication. Norwegian national guidelines for treatment of stroke, issued in 2010, therefore give recommendations on the content of the discharge summaries. One ambition is to achieve collaboration and knowledge transfer, contributing to integration of the health care services. However, studies suggest that adherence to guidelines in general practice is weak, that collaboration within the health care services does not work the way the authorities intend, and that health care services are fragmented. This study aims to assess to what degree the discharge summaries adhere to the guideline recommendations on content and to what degree they are used as tools for knowledge transfer and collaboration between secondary and primary care. Methods The study was an analysis of 54 discharge summaries for home-dwelling stroke patients. The patients had been discharged from two Norwegian local hospitals in 2011 and 2012 and followed up in primary care. We examined whether content was according to guidelines’ recommendations and performed a descriptive and interpretative discourse analysis, using tools adapted from an established integrated approach to discourse analysis.  Results We found a varying degree of adherence to the different advice for the contents of the discharge summaries. One tendency was clear: topics relevant here and now, i.e. at the hospital, were included, while topics most relevant for the later follow-up in primary care were to a larger degree omitted. In most discharge summaries, we did not find anything indicating that the doctors at the hospital made themselves available for collaboration with primary care after dischargeof the patient. Conclusions The discharge summaries did not fulfill their potential to serve as tools for collaboration, knowledge transfer, and guideline implementation. Instead, they may contribute to sustain the gap between hospital medicine and general practice.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Coll ◽  
Mary E Walsh ◽  
Tom Fahey ◽  
Frank Moriarty

Objective: To examine factors associated with continuation of hospital-initiated benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) among adults aged ≥65 years, specifically instructions on hospital discharge summaries. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved anonymised electronic record data on prescribing and hospitalisations for 38,229 patients aged ≥65 from forty-four GP practices in Ireland 2011-2016. BZRA initiations were identified among patients with no BZRA prescription in the previous 12 months. Multivariate regression examined whether instructions on discharge messages for hospital-initiated BZRA prescriptions was associated with continuation after discharge in primary care and time to discontinuation. Results: Most BZRA initiations occurred in primary care, however the rate of hospital-initiated BZRAs was higher. Almost 60% of 418 hospital initiations had some BZRA instructions (e.g. duration) on the discharge summary. Approximately 40% (n=166) were continued in primary care. Lower age, being prescribed a Z-drug or great number of medicines were associated with higher risk of continuation. Of those continued in primary care, in 98 cases (59.6%) the BZRA was discontinued during follow-up (after a mean 184 days). Presence of instructions was associated with higher likelihood of discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.67, 95%CI 1.09-2.55). Conclusions: Improved communication to GPs after hospital discharge may be important in avoiding long-term BZRA use.


BJGP Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen18X101625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A Spencer ◽  
Sarah Rodgers ◽  
Ndeshi Salema ◽  
Stephen M Campbell ◽  
Anthony J Avery

BackgroundDischarge summaries are essential for communicating patient information from secondary care to general practice on hospital discharge. Although there has been extensive research into their design and completion in secondary care, very little is known about primary care processing of these documents.AimTo explore what general practice staff think are the factors associated with failure to respond to actions requested in discharge summaries and what practices do to mitigate this.Design & settingSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with primary care staff in three geographical regions of England.MethodInterviews with 10 practice managers and 10 GPs (one of each at each of the 10 practices) were undertaken to explore management of discharge summaries.ResultsFive themes emerged from the interviews. The 'secondary care factors' theme describes participants’ perspectives on the design of summaries, which are inconsistent and often require improvement. The 'safety features of processing systems' theme focuses on document handling in primary care. A theme devoted to 'medicines reconciliation' followed. 'Error and harm as a result of faulty processing' is a theme describing ‘human error’ and other factors that participants believed contributed to failure to respond to requested actions. Finally, the 'strategies for safety improvement' theme describes initiatives to prevent failures of safer transitions of care.ConclusionCorrect processing of discharge summaries is essential to ensure patients experience a safe transition of care and not just a hospital discharge. Based on the interview findings, strategies to mitigate against faults in the processing of discharge summaries have been suggested to enhance safer transitions of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Ruths ◽  
Inger Haukenes ◽  
Øystein Hetlevik ◽  
Tone Smith-Sivertsen ◽  
Stefan Hjørleifsson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Depression is highly prevalent, but knowledge is scarce as to whether increased public awareness and strengthened government focus on mental health have changed how general practitioners (GPs) help their depressed patients. This study aimed to examine national time trends in GP depression care and whether trends varied regarding patient gender, age, and comorbidity. Methods Nationwide registry-based cohort study, Norway. The study population comprised all residents aged 20 years or older with new depression diagnoses recorded in general practice, 2009–2015. We linked reimbursement claims data from all consultations in general practice for depression with information on demographics and antidepressant medication. The outcome was type(s) of GP depression care during 12 months from the date of diagnosis: (long) consultation, talking therapy, antidepressant drug treatment, sickness absence certification, and referral to secondary mental health care. Covariates were patient gender, age, and comorbidity. The data are presented as frequencies and tested with generalized linear models. Results We included 365,947 new depression diagnoses. Mean patient age was 44 years (SD = 16), 61.9 % were women, 41.2 % had comorbidity. From 2009 to 2015, proportions of patients receiving talking therapy (42.3–63.4 %), long consultations (56.4–71.8 %), and referral to secondary care (16.6–21.6 %) increased, while those receiving drug treatment (31.3–25.9 %) and sick-listing (58.1–50 %) decreased. The trends were different for gender (women had a greater increase in talking therapy and a smaller decrease in sick-listing, compared to men), age (working-aged patients had a smaller increase in talking therapy, a greater increase in long consultations, and a smaller decrease in antidepressant drug use, compared to older patients) and comorbidity (patients with mental comorbidity had a smaller increase in talking therapy and a greater increase in long consultations, compared to those with no comorbidity and somatic comorbidity). Conclusions The observed time trends in GP depression care towards increased provision of psychological treatment and less drug treatment and sick-listing were in the desired direction according to Norwegian health care policy. However, the large and persistent differences in treatment rates between working-aged and older patients needs further investigation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Biggs ◽  
Timothy C. Biggs

Purpose: Independent prescribing pharmacists are able to independently prescribe medications following additional postgraduate training. This study examined their use in completing medical discharge summaries, normally completed by junior doctors, in order to assess their impact on expedited hospital discharge times. Methods: In total, 163 patients were studied through a 2-stage audit. The first cycle evaluated junior doctors completing medical discharge summaries (as is normal practice). Three independent prescribing pharmacists were then trained to complete discharge summaries, and a second cycle was completed. Results: Following implementation of independent prescribing pharmacists to complete medical discharge summaries, the time from medical decision to discharge to summary completion dropped significantly (mean of 2:42 hours to 1:35 hours, P < .001). The time from medical decision to discharge to actual hospital discharge also dropped significantly (mean of 5:21 hours to 3:58 hours, P < .01). The number of discharge summary medication errors dropped significantly ( P < .05) between audit cycles. Conclusion: The introduction of independent prescribing pharmacists to complete medical discharge summaries has significantly reduced the time to summary completion, discharge time, and the number of medication errors. In a time of limited medical resources and bed shortages, the use of allied health professionals to improve service delivery is of paramount importance. This project is the first of its kind within the literature.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lone Flarup ◽  
Grete Moth ◽  
Morten Bondo Christensen ◽  
Mogens Vestergaard ◽  
Frede Olesen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaideep S. Talwalkar ◽  
Jason R. Ouellette ◽  
Shawnette Alston ◽  
Gregory K. Buller ◽  
Daniel Cottrell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Poor communication at hospital discharge can increase the risk of adverse events. The hospital discharge summary is the most common tool for detailing events related to hospitalization in preparation for postdischarge follow-up, yet deficiencies in discharge summaries have been widely reported. Resident physicians are expected to dictate discharge summaries but receive little formal training in this arena. We hypothesized that implementation of an educational program on chart documentation skills would result in improvements in the quality of hospital discharge summaries in a community hospital internal medicine residency program. Methods A monthly, 1-hour workshop was launched in August 2007 to provide consistent and ongoing instruction on chart documentation. Guided by a faculty moderator, residents reviewed 2 randomly selected peer chart notes per session using instruments developed for that purpose. After the workshop had been in place for 2 years, 4 faculty members reviewed 63 randomly selected discharge summaries from spring 2007, spring 2008, and spring 2009 using a 14-item evaluation tool. Results Mean scores for 10 of the 14 individual items improved in a stepwise manner during the 3 years of the study. Items related to overall quality of the discharge summary showed statistically significant improvement, as did the portion of the summaries “carbon copied” to the responsible outpatient physician. Conclusions The quality of hospital discharge summaries improved following the implementation of a novel, structured program to teach chart documentation skills. Ongoing improvement was seen 1 and 2 years into the program, suggesting that continuing instruction in those skills was beneficial.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e024747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Redmond ◽  
Ronald McDowell ◽  
Tamasine C Grimes ◽  
Fiona Boland ◽  
Ronan McDonnell ◽  
...  

ObjectivesWhether unintended discontinuation of common, evidence-based, long-term medication occurs after hospitalisation; what factors are associated with unintended discontinuation; and whether the presence of documentation of medication at hospital discharge is associated with continuity of medication in general practice.DesignRetrospective cohort study between 2012 and 2015.SettingElectronic records and hospital supplied discharge notifications in 44 Irish general practices.Participants20 488 patients aged 65 years or more prescribed long-term medication for chronic conditions.Primary and secondary outcomesDiscontinuity of four evidence-based medication drug classes: antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, thyroid replacement drugs and respiratory inhalers in hospitalised versus non-hospitalised patients; patient and health system factors associated with discontinuity; impact of the presence of medication in the hospital discharge summary on continuity of medication in a patient’s general practitioner (GP) prescribing record at 6 months follow-up.ResultsIn patients admitted to hospital, medication discontinuity ranged from 6%–11% in the 6 months posthospitalisation. Discontinuity of medication is significantly lower for hospitalised patients taking respiratory inhalers (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.63, 95% CI (0.49 to 0.80), p<0.001) and thyroid medications (AOR 0.62, 95% CI (0.40 to 0.96), p=0.03). There is no association between discontinuity of medication and hospitalisation for antithrombotics (AOR 0.95, 95% CI (0.81 to 1.11), p=0.49) or lipid lowering medications (AOR 0.92, 95% CI (0.78 to 1.08), p=0.29). Older patients and those who paid to see their GP were more likely to experience increased odds of discontinuity in all four medicine groups. Less than half (39% to 47.4%) of patients had medication listed on their hospital discharge summary. Presence of medication on hospital discharge summary is significantly associated with continuity of medication in the GP prescribing record for lipid lowering medications (AOR 1.64, 95% CI (1.15 to 2.36), p=0.01) and respiratory inhalers (AOR 2.97, 95% CI (1.68 to 5.25), p<0.01).ConclusionDiscontinuity of evidence-based long-term medication is common. Increasing age and private medical care are independently associated with a higher risk of medication discontinuity. Hospitalisation is not associated with discontinuity but less than half of hospitalised patients have medication recorded on their hospital discharge summary.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Rose Mourra ◽  
Jason S Fish ◽  
Michael Adam Pfeffer

Objective: Deficits in communication between inpatient and outpatient physicians in the post-hospital discharge period are common and potentially detrimental to person-centered doctor-patient relationships and to patient health. This study assesses the impact of a hospital discharge improvement project implemented at an urban academic hospital, aimed at improving the timeliness and quality of discharge summaries using a standardized discharge template, education and a small monetary incentive. Methods: A random sample of 624 charts from an academic, urban hospitalist medicine service was analyzed from the pre- and post-project implementation time periods: 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. The sampling was evenly distributed throughout the months of the year. Ordinary linear regression modeling was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on time to completion; logistic regression modeling was used to assess the impact on the quality of the discharge summaries. Both models control for patient characteristics, hospitalization acuity and in-hospital continuity of care.Results: Unadjusted time to discharge summary completion rates decreased by 2.4 days (p<0.001) between the pre- and post-implementation times. Controlling for patient demographics, acuity of hospitalization and hand-offs between physicians, time to completion of discharge summaries was decreased by 2.17 days (p< 0.001). The odds of including at least 50% of the recommended information into a discharge summary post-intervention was 6.44 (p<0.001) compared to the odds before the intervention, controlling for patient demographics, acuity of hospitalization and hand-offs between physicians. Conclusion: The use of education, a simple formatted recommended discharge template and a small monetary incentive improved both the timeliness and quality of the information exchanged between inpatient and outpatient providers and contributes significantly to a person-centered healthcare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document