Complete description of the pair indicator-lower indicator of an entire function

1992 ◽  
pp. 75-106
Author(s):  
L. Podoshev
Keyword(s):  
Entire Function ◽  
Lower Indicator

Functions in the Schwartz algebra that are invertible in the sense of Ehrenpreis

2019 ◽  
Vol 484 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
N. F. Abuzyarova
Keyword(s):  
Entire Function ◽  
Exponential Type ◽  
Zero Set ◽  
Schwartz Algebra

We consider the problem of obtaining the restrictions on the zero set of an entire function of exponential type under which this function belongs to the Schwartz algebra and invertible in the sense of Ehrenpreis.

scholarly journals Uniqueness on entire functions and their nth order exact differences with two shared values

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-215
Author(s):  
Shengjiang Chen ◽  
Aizhu Xu
Keyword(s):  
Entire Function ◽  
Entire Functions ◽  
Shared Values ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Exact Difference ◽  
Hyper Order

Abstract Let f(z) be an entire function of hyper order strictly less than 1. We prove that if f(z) and its nth exact difference {\Delta }_{c}^{n}f(z) share 0 CM and 1 IM, then {\Delta }_{c}^{n}f(z)\equiv f(z) . Our result improves the related results of Zhang and Liao [Sci. China A, 2014] and Gao et al. [Anal. Math., 2019] by using a simple method.

Translation uniqueness of phase retrieval and magnitude retrieval of band-limited signals

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lung-Hui Chen
Keyword(s):  
Fourier Transform ◽  
Entire Function ◽  
Convex Hull ◽  
Scattering Theory ◽  
Phase Retrieval ◽  
Indicator Function ◽  
Band Limited ◽  
The Fourier Transform ◽  
Complex Valued ◽  
Spectral Invariant

Abstract In this paper, we discuss how to partially determine the Fourier transform F ⁢ ( z ) = ∫ - 1 1 f ⁢ ( t ) ⁢ e i ⁢ z ⁢ t ⁢ 𝑑 t , z ∈ ℂ , F(z)=\int_{-1}^{1}f(t)e^{izt}\,dt,\quad z\in\mathbb{C}, given the data | F ⁢ ( z ) | {\lvert F(z)\rvert} or arg ⁡ F ⁢ ( z ) {\arg F(z)} for z ∈ ℝ {z\in\mathbb{R}} . Initially, we assume [ - 1 , 1 ] {[-1,1]} to be the convex hull of the support of the signal f. We start with reviewing the computation of the indicator function and indicator diagram of a finite-typed complex-valued entire function, and then connect to the spectral invariant of F ⁢ ( z ) {F(z)} . Then we focus to derive the unimodular part of the entire function up to certain non-uniqueness. We elaborate on the translation of the signal including the non-uniqueness associates of the Fourier transform. We show that the phase retrieval and magnitude retrieval are conjugate problems in the scattering theory of waves.

scholarly journals Mocking the u-plane integral

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Korpas ◽  
Jan Manschot ◽  
Gregory W. Moore ◽  
Iurii Nidaiev
Keyword(s):  
Asymptotic Behavior ◽  
Gauge Theory ◽  
Entire Function ◽  
Gauge Group ◽  
Strong Coupling ◽  
Modular Forms ◽  
Correlation Functions ◽  
Coulomb Branch ◽  
Mock Modular Forms ◽  
Donaldson Invariants

AbstractThe u-plane integral is the contribution of the Coulomb branch to correlation functions of $${\mathcal {N}}=2$$ N = 2 gauge theory on a compact four-manifold. We consider the u-plane integral for correlators of point and surface observables of topologically twisted theories with gauge group $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ SU ( 2 ) , for an arbitrary four-manifold with $$(b_1,b_2^+)=(0,1)$$ ( b 1 , b 2 + ) = ( 0 , 1 ) . The u-plane contribution equals the full correlator in the absence of Seiberg–Witten contributions at strong coupling, and coincides with the mathematically defined Donaldson invariants in such cases. We demonstrate that the u-plane correlators are efficiently determined using mock modular forms for point observables, and Appell–Lerch sums for surface observables. We use these results to discuss the asymptotic behavior of correlators as function of the number of observables. Our findings suggest that the vev of exponentiated point and surface observables is an entire function of the fugacities.

scholarly journals Primeable entire functions

1973 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 123-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Gross ◽  
Chung-Chun Yang ◽  
Charles Osgood
Keyword(s):  
Entire Function ◽  
Periodic Function ◽  
Rational Function ◽  
Entire Functions ◽  
Left And Right

An entire function F(z) = f(g(z)) is said to have f(z) and g(z) as left and right factors respe2tively, provided that f(z) is meromorphic and g(z) is entire (g may be meromorphic when f is rational). F(z) is said to be prime (pseudo-prime) if every factorization of the above form implies that one of the functions f and g is bilinear (a rational function). F is said to be E-prime (E-pseudo prime) if every factorization of the above form into entire factors implies that one of the functions f and g is linear (a polynomial). We recall here that an entire non-periodic function f is prime if and only if it is E-prime [5]. This fact will be useful in the sequel.

On uniformly perfect boundary of stable domains in iteration of meromorphic functions II

2002 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHENG JIAN-HUA
Keyword(s):  
Entire Function ◽  
Meromorphic Function ◽  
Meromorphic Functions ◽  
Julia Set ◽  
Fatou Set ◽  
Deficient Value ◽  
Uniformly Perfect ◽  
Simply Connected ◽  
Stable Domains ◽  
Uniform Perfectness

We investigate uniform perfectness of the Julia set of a transcendental meromorphic function with finitely many poles and prove that the Julia set of such a meromorphic function is not uniformly perfect if it has only bounded components. The Julia set of an entire function is uniformly perfect if and only if the Julia set including infinity is connected and every component of the Fatou set is simply connected. Furthermore if an entire function has a finite deficient value in the sense of Nevanlinna, then it has no multiply connected stable domains. Finally, we give some examples of meromorphic functions with uniformly perfect Julia sets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document